Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

car over the plan period. Reducing the reliance on the private car could in turn reduce pressure on the SRN (it is however acknowledged that the SRN provides a transport route for many people outside the Borough, as well as Borough residents and businesses). 6.9 The effects development will have on the Strategic and Non-Strategic Road Networks were assessed in the Transport Impact Assessment (TIA) carried out by Surrey County Council for RBC in 2010 to accompany the core strategy. This modelling was based on 2500 dwellings coming forward on the former DERA site and 65,000sqm of commercial floor space. Since the 2010 TIA was published however the predicted amount of development on the former DERA site has changed and now some 1500 dwellings are proposed and 80,000sqm of commercial floor space. As such, the modelling is currently being updated by SCC to reflect these amended figures and other adjustments to the forecasted level of development in the Borough over the plan period. The TIA 2012 is expected to be completed by SCC officers at the end of November 2012. Surrey County Council has however in the meantime produced a Technical Note: Transport measures to support growth identified in the Runnymede Borough Core Strategy’ (June 2012) which identifies weaknesses and threats to the existing transport network in the Borough and lists the schemes which are proposed by SCC to support growth in the Borough over the plan period. Future provision 6.10 There are no known schemes planned to the SRN within the Borough over the plan period. 6.11 There are however a number of schemes planned on the SRN in close proximity to the Borough which may come forward over the plan period. These schemes may have implications for Runnymede’s businesses and residents. As such, these schemes are considered worthy of mention. These schemes are: • Scheme of improvements to the A3 junctions through Guildford estimated to cost between £8 and £10 million. This scheme has been recommended by Enterprise M3 to the Highways Agency. Whilst the scheme has failed to secure government funding to date, there will be a third tranche of funding announced in early 2013 and it is hoped that Government will approve funding for improvements on this road at this time 17 . • M25 Junction 10 Wisley Junction: Several schemes are under consideration to address congestion on the northbound A3 on-slip and northbound M25 offslip. SCC gave support to the proposals in the Enterprise M3 consultation on Highways Agency schemes in April 2012. • M3 Corridor Junction 3 and 4a: Study proposed to build on conclusions of Transport Evaluation for M3 Corridor Cross Authority Study. The study would look to assess the cumulative impacts of future development on the M3 corridor specifically between M3 Junction 3 (Lightwater) and M3 Junction 4a (FarnBorough). Depending on the conclusions of the study, additional infrastructure provision or further investigation to identify deliverable mitigation or demand management measures may then be required. Costs and funding sources 6.12 As no works to the SRN within the Borough are forecasted over the plan period, the costs and funding sources do not need to be considered in this section. 17 See: http://www.enterprisem3.org.uk/news/5-9m-road-boost-for-the-enterprise-m3-area/ Page | 51 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Risk Assessment 6.13 The production of an effective and robust sustainable transport strategy for the Borough [Risk ID IDPR004] might not be achieved over the plan period. As a result, congestion on the SRN could increase to an unacceptable level. This could have a knock on effect for congestion on the non strategic road network and could reduce the desirability of the Borough for residents and businesses to live in and operate from. This could have implications for economic growth within the Borough. The likelihood of Risk IDRT71 being realised is considered high, given the fact that to date, and in spite of numerous transport strategies and transport plans being in place, the effects of congestion continue to increase. The severity is considered to be medium, as the effects if realised will act more frequently above the capacity of the network. 6.14 Risk ID IDPR005 relates to the affects of accelerated climate change. It considers the ability of the network to function to capacity as a result of adaptation inaction on the part of the network provider/users. This is a recognised and credible universal risk to this infrastructure and one that the Council has no control over. The probability is considered low given the fact that events such as snow generally presents more problems on the non-strategic road network than the SRN, and thus corresponds with a reduction in the load capacity requirement on the strategic network. The severity however is considered to be high. 6.15 The impact Runnymede's Local Plan will have on the SRN [Risk IDPR006] is being assessed in the SCC TIA 2012 (expected end of November 2012). It is considered likely however that the TIA 2012 will confirm that any increase in traffic on the SRN as a result of the forecasted development in the Local Plan coming forward will not significantly impact on the SRN. 6.16 In summary three risks are identified which are summarised in the table below. Conclusion Risk ID Description Probability Severity IDPR004 IDPR005 Failure to achieve sustainable transport strategy Effect of climate change on network capacity High Low Medium High IDPR006 Impact of RBC Local Plan on SRN Medium Medium 6.17 Development proposals over the plan period are likely to place some additional pressure on the SRN routes which run through Runnymede. It is considered reasonable to assume that pressure on the SRN will come from the increase in development across Surrey and the London Fringe sub region generally however rather than the development proposed in Runnymede in isolation. This is however a tentative conclusion at this stage and can only be verified once the TIA 2012 has been completed. 6.18 Of the three identified risks, IDPR004 is likely to be the only one that RBC could reasonably influence. The other identified risks lie outside the Council’s control. Non-Strategic Road Network Existing conditions 6.19 The non-strategic road network comprises A roads (non trunk), B, C and D roads which connect the various settlements within the Borough as well as areas outside the Borough boundaries. Significant routes within the Borough which lead into the SRN are identified as follows (and are shown in Figure 11 above): Page | 52 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12: Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14: provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16: CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18: Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20: Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22: Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26: o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28: LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30: Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34: Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36: Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38: Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40: Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42: • The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44: 5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46: Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48: eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50: IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52: Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54: 5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56: 5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58: Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61: Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 65 and 66: Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68: Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70: • Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72: IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74: 6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76: 6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78: Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80: 6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82: Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84: 6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86: IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88: 6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92: above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94: Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96: Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98: Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104: Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106: Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110: in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116:
predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118:
• Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 119 and 120:
Costs and funding sources 10.38 The
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 123 and 124:
Costs and funding sources 10.54 The
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128:
Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130:
IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132:
11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138:
12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142:
expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144:
Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146:
percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148:
13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150:
Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152:
of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154:
Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156:
with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158:
14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160:
14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162:
• Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164:
14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166:
14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168:
• reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170:
following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172:
14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174:
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178:
consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180:
16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?