Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
amenity open space as used in the IDP and amenity green space as used in the Open<br />
Space Survey refer to the same types of spaces. As such, the conclusions in the Open<br />
Space Study can be relied upon in this report).<br />
10.60 Generally, the amenity open space within the <strong>Borough</strong> was found in the Open Space<br />
Survey (2010) to be of medium quality. Poor accessibility was identified for amenity<br />
open space for residents of the Virginia Water area although it has been identified that<br />
there is a comparatively low population. It was also found that in the Chertsey area<br />
there is a smaller provision of amenity open space per 1000 population than was noted<br />
in the other areas considered (the green space available is of medium quality).<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong><br />
10.61 There are policies in the Local <strong>Plan</strong> which relate to the location of development (LP01<br />
to LP08) and the design of development (SP05). Details may come forward in the<br />
future which contain thresholds for new development where amenity open space is<br />
required to be provided.<br />
Future Provision<br />
10.62 Amenity open space will be provided as part of the development at the former DERA<br />
site. This will form part of the overall package of green infrastructure which is expected<br />
as part of the overall scheme.<br />
Costs and funding sources<br />
10.63 Any amenity open space provided as part of the development at the former DERA site<br />
would be funded by the developer. There are no known plans to provide any other<br />
amenity green spaces within the <strong>Borough</strong> over the plan period at the current time.<br />
Funding<br />
ID<br />
IDPF084<br />
Risk Assessment<br />
Description<br />
Amenity space to be provided at the<br />
former DERA site<br />
Estimated<br />
Cost<br />
Unknown<br />
Key<br />
Provider(s)<br />
Developer<br />
funded<br />
10.64 The biggest risks to this type of infrastructure relate to total loss or reduction in quality.<br />
This would have a knock on effect for the general public and the character of the<br />
<strong>Borough</strong>. A number of the existing amenity open spaces within the <strong>Borough</strong> are<br />
however privately owned by public bodies (i.e. a number of the amenity open spaces in<br />
the <strong>Borough</strong> are <strong>Council</strong> owned). As responsible landowners, the risk of the spaces<br />
being lost or degraded is considered to be low (unless their total or partial loss can be<br />
justified on the basis that they are surplus to requirements). Amenity open spaces in<br />
housing developments are normally subject to private management agreements, and<br />
again therefore, it is considered that there is a low risk of these spaces being lost or<br />
degraded.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Risk ID Description Probability Severity<br />
IDPR032 Total loss Low Low<br />
IDPR033 Reduction in quality Low Low<br />
10.65 Overall, it is considered that there is a sufficient provision of amenity open spaces<br />
within the <strong>Borough</strong> at the current time. Amenity open space will be provided at the<br />
former DERA site to support this large new development. Other, smaller developments<br />
in the <strong>Borough</strong>’s Urban Areas could utilise existing amenity open spaces which exist.<br />
Capacity of these existing amenity green spaces will need to be assessed during the<br />
plan period to ensure that growth will not exceed capacity.<br />
Page | 113<br />
<strong>Runnymede</strong> IDP DRAFT – <strong>Feb</strong>ruary <strong>2013</strong>