Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Funding<br />
ID<br />
IDPF028<br />
Risk Assessment<br />
Description<br />
Rail improvements at Longcross<br />
Station to support the development<br />
at the former DERA site<br />
Estimated<br />
Cost<br />
unknown<br />
Key<br />
Provider(s)<br />
South West<br />
Trains,<br />
Developer<br />
6.74 The main risk to the capacity [IDPR010] of this infrastructure is considered to be<br />
congestion caused by a surge in users over the plan period (without necessary<br />
measures in place to deal with increased users being put in place). This would lead to<br />
severe overcrowding, particularly on the already congested commuter trains. This could<br />
impact on the economy if commuters are discouraged from accessing trains to bring<br />
them into, or take them out of the <strong>Borough</strong>. The probability of this risk being realised is<br />
considered to be high. This is due, in part, to the considerable time lag in bringing<br />
measures to increase capacity forward. The severity is also considered to be high as<br />
this scenario would have a knock on effect, and cumulative impact on both the SRN<br />
and non-SNR. This is because the implication of IDPR010 is people resorting to using<br />
their cars to travel, increasing congestion on the roads within the <strong>Borough</strong>. It is<br />
considered however that improvements to rail services and enhancements to rail<br />
facilities (such as the proposals at London Waterloo) would reduce the likelihood of<br />
such an event occurring.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Risk ID Description Probability Severity<br />
IDPR010<br />
Congestion caused by a surge in<br />
demand with no mitigation in place<br />
6.75 Development proposals over the plan period are likely to place some additional<br />
pressure on the rail infrastructure within the <strong>Borough</strong>. An assessment of the cumulative<br />
effects of proposed development in Surrey over the coming years on the rail network is<br />
currently being undertaken by SCC. This will identify where enhancements to services<br />
and facilities are required. Preparing for an increase in demand for rail services is<br />
ultimately however considered to fall outside the remit of the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
Bus Network<br />
Existing provision<br />
6.76 In terms of transport modal choice, it is evident from the data reported elsewhere in the<br />
IDP that car use is the preferred mode within the <strong>Borough</strong> (see: Table 7 and Figure 13).<br />
According to the National Travel Survey 2010, between 1995/97 and 2010 there was a<br />
14% drop in number of trips per person per year by bus outside London. This figure<br />
corresponds with a general rise in traffic over a similar period 26 .<br />
6.77 There are a number of commercial bus service providers operating services which run<br />
within or through the <strong>Borough</strong> of <strong>Runnymede</strong>. People aged 60 or over and the disabled<br />
are eligible for free bus passes for off-peak travel in <strong>Runnymede</strong> (as they are in Surrey<br />
as a whole). There are 319 bus stops in the <strong>Borough</strong>, although the greatest<br />
concentrations of bus stops are located in the <strong>Borough</strong>’s Urban Areas. Specifically, 13<br />
commercial bus services run within or through the <strong>Borough</strong>, 8 of which are defined as<br />
frequent (defined by Surrey <strong>Council</strong> as services which operate at least once an hour, 5<br />
days a week, all year round).<br />
6.78 Services operate to most towns and villages within the <strong>Borough</strong> although service<br />
provision varies for different areas. Bus timetable information for different parts of the<br />
High<br />
High<br />
26<br />
See DfT Road Transport Forecasts 2011<br />
Page | 65<br />
<strong>Runnymede</strong> IDP DRAFT – <strong>Feb</strong>ruary <strong>2013</strong>