Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 15 - Summary of flood risks in Runnymede Source of flooding Fluvial Fluvial Pathway Area at Risk/Receptor Risk Out of bank flow from the Thames, Wey, Addlestone Bourne and Chertsey Bourne Backing up of water in the Chertsey Bourne and other tributaries from high levels in the Thames Out of bank flow from Chertsey Bourne Backing up of water in the Chertsey Bourne from Egham, Egham Hythe, Chertsey and Addlestone within the floodplain of the Lower Thames and Chertsey Bourne Thorpe and Thorpe Green in the floodplain of the Chertsey Bourne high levels in the Thames Groundwater Rising groundwater levels Low lying areas in the Thames floodplain and in areas of alluvial sands and gravels Surface Water Local Plan Sewer capacity Impounded waters Surcharging of drains or culverted watercourses Surcharging of sewers Breach of raised canal or cascade on reservoir Areas of Egham and Woodham that have experienced previous surface runoff flooding Areas within low lying floodplain with naturally wet soils Potential for sewer capacity problems in Egham and Chertsey Residual risk downstream of Virginia Water lake in Virginia Water and Chertsey Residual risk in Woodham from the Basingstoke Canal Very high High Medium Low Low Negligible Tidal None None in Runnymede None Source: Runnymede Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), May 2009 13.53 The location policies in the Local Plan; LP01-LP08, are considered to be most relevant in this case. These policies confirm where new development is expected in the Borough over the plan period. The Council’s preferred approach is that in the Borough’s Urban Areas, development would be focussed in areas with the lowest risk of flooding. Development will also take place at the former DERA site in Longcross which is in the Green Belt but in flood zone 1. 13.54 Strategic policy 10 (SP10) is also considered to be materially relevant as it is concerned with development and flood risk. This policy recognises the severity of the flooding risk and lack of formal flood defences within the Borough. Future provision 13.55 The Lower Thames Flood Risk Management Strategy (LTFRMS) which went out to public consultation in 2009, has the key objective of identifying sustainable solutions to reduce flood risk to people and property. This strategy presents a long term programme Page | 139 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
of works within the context of a 100 year strategic plan. The LTFRMS will reduce the risk of river flooding to 15,000 properties with a one per cent annual (1 in 100 year) chance of flooding from Datchet to Teddington. Measures proposed in the strategy include: • building three flood diversion channels (Channel 1 would run from Datchet to Wraysbury; Channel 2 from Egham to Chertsey and Channel 3 from Chertsey to Shepperton) • widening or deepening of the DesBorough Cut • capacity increases to Sunbury, Molesey, and Teddington weirs • Individual property protection measures for improving resistance against flooding for smaller groups of properties • improving mapping information for emergency evacuation plans 13.56 Specifically, within Chertsey, both local and combined flood impacts from the Chertsey Bourne and the River Thames are known to be significant. There are numerous tributaries and minor drainage channels in the area and many would receive some reduction in flood risk due to the proposed diversion channels, which would reduce flood levels generally. The Chertsey Bourne system, incorporating the Mead Lake Ditch and Moat, has been assessed as receiving significant benefits from diversion Channel 2. A previous study into the flooding impacts of the Chertsey Bourne was included into the wider Lower Thames Strategy. 13.57 In regard to the community based measures for improving resistance against flooding for smaller groups of properties, within the Borough, the Environment Agency have assessed a number of properties in Timsway, Coopers Close and Staines Lane (all in Staines). Work was carried out to identified properties in 2012 following survey reports carried out by the Environment Agency for the residents. 13.58 Given the difficulties with securing the funding for the project however (for more information on this please see the ‘costs and funding sources’ section below), works will be delivered through separate projects. According to the Environment Agency, works are unlikely to start in 2017 as originally stated. During the Local Plan period, it is only the individual property protection works proposed under the LTFRMS which will be carried out in Runnymede. The civil works and cut works are planned to take place after 2026. 13.59 The River Wey Flood Risk Management Strategy which was previously proposed has now largely been abandoned although the Environment Agency advise that they are continuing their work on the refurbishment of the weirs along the route. Costs and funding sources 13.60 The Whole Life Cost (excluding inflation) of the LTFRMS is £538m including a contingency of £101m. As a consequence of the Government’s 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review however, Defra has instructed the Environment Agency to reduce their capital expenditure by 27% by 2014. This has implications on the size of their capital programme and their proposed schemes. In June 2011, Defra introduced a new policy of Partnership Funding. This scheme enables a greater number of schemes to receive at least some capital funding, with the remaining amount being made up from external contributions. Fewer schemes will however receive 100% Defra Grant in Aid (GiA) funding. 13.61 When the Environment Agency undertook the public consultation for the LTFRMS in 2009, the scheme was eligible for 100% Defra funding, based on the strength of the business case. The change in policy means that the delivery of the LTS will now Page | 140 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26:
o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28:
LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30:
Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34:
Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36:
Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38:
Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42:
• The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44:
5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48:
eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50:
IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54:
5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56:
5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58:
Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64:
Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66:
Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70:
• Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72:
IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74:
6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76:
6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78:
Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80:
6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82:
Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84:
6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86:
IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88:
6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92:
above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94:
Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96:
Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98:
Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104: Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106: Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110: in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114: Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116: predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118: • Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 121 and 122: Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128: Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130: IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132: 11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136: Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138: 12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140: Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142: expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144: Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146: percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148: 13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149: Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 153 and 154: Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156: with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158: 14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160: 14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162: • Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164: 14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166: 14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168: • reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170: following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172: 14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174: 14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178: consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180: 16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182: Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 201 and 202:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?