Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Conclusion medium risk of further land not coming forward over the plan period to support expansion of existing cemeteries or provision of new facilities, the severity of such a risk is considered to be low as the Borough contains cemeteries which still have capacity to meet demand over the plan period. Risk ID Description Probability Severity IDPR055 IDPR056 Lack of available land for extension of existing cemeteries or provision of new cemeteries Supply of space for burials failing to meet demand Medium 14.135 Overall, over the plan period, it seems likely that the capacity of cemeteries in the Borough will continue to decrease given the increase in the population which is predicted. Whilst Addlestone and Thorpe cemeteries have limited capacity to meet demand over the plan period, their extension is being considered by the Council. Even if these facilities are not extended, Chertsey and Englefield Green cemeteries have sufficient capacity to meet demand over the plan period. As such, the existing provision is considered adequate. Low Low Low Page | 163 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arrangements 15.1 The Council is committed to helping ensure that the necessary infrastructure is delivered over the plan period to support the development forecasted to come forward, and to deliver the Council’s spatial strategy. Governance arrangements to ensure that this happens will be considered in detail and put in place prior to the adoption of the Council’s Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) charging regime in April 2014. 15.2 It should be noted that the Council has substantial experience in this area, putting in place and successfully operating systems to monitor and collect S106 money generated through the Council’s tariff based system, as well as monies collected in line with the Council’s Avoidance Strategy for the TBHSPA. Collected monies are distributed to the relevant agencies to ensure that it is able to co-ordinate the delivery of infrastructure with development as it comes forward. 15.3 Whatever governance arrangements are decided upon, the Council will ensure that there are resources in place to ensure (amongst other things) that: • Systems are put in place to collect and monitor CIL payments; • Arrangements are put in place to ensure that collected CIL monies are passed to relevant departments and organisations, to ensure that infrastructure is delivered in a timely manner, as well as local communities and neighbourhood forums; • There is regular liaison with stakeholders to keep abreast of new infrastructure projects which are proposed to come forward and to ensure that the status of existing schemes identified in the IDP are known. Such information will be used to keep the IDP a relevant and up to date document; • The enforcement functions associated with non payment of CIL monies are carried out; and, • An annual progress report is prepared for consideration by the Planning Committee and for inclusion in the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR). This will detail how much CIL money has been collected annually, how the money has been spent, the amount for admin expenses that has been collected etc (as required under section 62 of the CIL regulations). It will be published on the Council’s website. Forging links with partners 15.4 The preparation of the IDP has helped strengthen relationships between the Council and various agencies. It is considered that these relationships will help develop structures to facilitate a different, more collaborative way of working with partners in the future. As such, work on the IDP is considered to offer a platform for developing a spatial planning approach and integrating the capital investment programmes of various services with planning for new development. The relationships with partners therefore need to be maintained and strengthened over the plan period so that such an approach can be achieved. 15.5 In particular, it will be important to forge strong links with Surrey County Council and the Enterprise M3 Local Enterprise Partnership to ensure a joined up approach is taken in delivering essential infrastructure across the Borough. 15.6 Enterprise M3 Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP): The Enterprise M3 Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) is a public/private partnership set up to support and sustain economic growth at a local level. The LEP operates within a network of existing business support, provided by the private sector, the public sector, and a range of membership and third sector bodies. The LEP works in partnership with these bodies. It also works within a network of existing public sector funding and decision making, on Page | 164 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26:
o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28:
LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30:
Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34:
Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36:
Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38:
Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42:
• The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44:
5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48:
eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50:
IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54:
5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56:
5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58:
Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64:
Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66:
Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70:
• Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72:
IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74:
6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76:
6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78:
Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80:
6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82:
Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84:
6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86:
IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88:
6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92:
above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94:
Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96:
Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98:
Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100:
Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104:
Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106:
Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110:
in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116:
predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118:
• Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 119 and 120:
Costs and funding sources 10.38 The
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 123 and 124: Costs and funding sources 10.54 The
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128: Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130: IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132: 11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136: Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138: 12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140: Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142: expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144: Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146: percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148: 13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150: Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152: of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154: Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156: with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158: 14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160: 14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162: • Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164: 14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166: 14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168: • reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170: following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172: 14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173: 14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 177 and 178: consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180: 16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182: Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 211 and 212: Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214: Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216: Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218: TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220: Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222: Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224: Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?