Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Risk Assessment 14.120 The main risk to places of worship is their loss to other uses. Given the increase in diversity in Surrey and across the UK more generally however, it is considered that the risk of this occurring is relatively low in this instance. Risk ID Description Probability Severity IDPR054 Loss of places of worship to other uses Low Low Conclusion 14.121 Overall the number of places of worship in the Borough is considered adequate at the current time. Should additional provision be required over the plan period, it is considered that this would be justified on a needs basis. Any forthcoming planning applications for new or extended places of worship would be considered on their individual merits. Cemeteries & Crematoriums Existing conditions 14.122 There is increasing concern about the availability of burial sites across the country and this is an emerging issue in Runnymede. There is generally a good distribution of cemeteries and churchyards across the Borough, but there is a shortage of grave space in some. Specifically, there are four Council owned cemeteries and a number of churches with graveyards in the following locations: Cemeteries Englefield Green cemetery off St Judes Road, Englefield Green Thorpe Cemetery off Ten Acre Lane, Thorpe Chertsey Cemetery off St Johns Way, Chertsey Addlestone Cemetery off Green Lane, Addlestone Churches with graveyards St Judes United Church, St Judes Road, Englefield Green St John the Baptist Church, High Street, Egham Christ Church, Christchurch Road, Virginia Water Christ Church, Guildford Road, Ottershaw Holy Trinity Church, Lyne 14.123 The largest of the Borough’s cemeteries is the Englefield Green Cemetery with an approximate area of 5 hectares. A Muslim Burial Service is provided at Englefield Green Cemetery. 14.124 There is a Children's Memorial Garden in Addlestone cemetery, which caters for stillbirths, NVF (non viable foetus) and cremated remains, working in conjunction with St Peter's and Ashford Hospital NHS Trust 14.125 In terms of capacity, it is not known whether any of the churches with graveyards in the Borough are still accepting burials. In relation to Council owned cemeteries, Englefield Green and Chertsey cemeteries have sufficient capacity to accommodate internments for many years (and beyond 2026). All of the available space at Addlestone cemetery will be used by early 2013 and the cemetery at Thorpe is nearing capacity. As such, options for extending both these cemeteries are being explored by the Council at the current time. Page | 161 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alternative to burial (current figures suggest that around 70% of all funerals are cremations (Runnymede Borough Council website), there are no crematoriums in the Borough. The nearest crematoriums are located at Hanworth, Guildford and Leatherhead. The capacity of these existing crematoriums is unknown. Local Plan 14.127 It is considered reasonable to assume that new development proposed under Local Plan Policy LP02 (housing provision and distribution) over the plan period will impact on the existing cemeteries in the Borough and crematoriums in the area surrounding the Borough. Future provision 14.128 It is considered reasonable to assume that an increase in the population in the Borough over the plan period is likely to increase demand for cemeteries in the Borough and reduce their capacity. It would be up to the Council to decide whether to extend current/provide new cemeteries. 14.129 Within the Council, there is an aspiration to extend Addlestone Cemetery. Whilst the Council’s capital spending programme 2011/12 to 2015/16 budgeted £199,000 for this project in 2013/14 (this money was for the laying out of a new cemetery on Council owned land), at the current time all capital spending has been frozen. It is therefore unclear whether this proposal will be realised during the plan period. There is also an aspiration to extend Thorpe Cemetery or provide a new cemetery in Thorpe if additional land becomes available. 14.130 If funding becomes available, the dilapidated/dangerous memorials at Egham Churchyard will also be refurbished. 14.131 There are however no known plans to erect a crematorium within the Borough during the plan period. Costs and funding sources 14.132 The extension to Addlestone Cemetery would be funded by Runnymede Borough Council. It is estimated that this would cost in the region of £200,000. 14.133 It is estimated that an extension to Thorpe Cemetery or the provision of a new cemetery in Thorpe would cost in the region in £50,000 although no funds have been allocated for these works at the current time by RBC. Funding ID Description Estimated Cost Key Provider(s) IDPF158 Extension to Addlestone Cemetery £200,000 RBC IDPF159 IDPF160 Risk Assessment Extension of Thorpe Cemetery/provision of new cemetery in Thorpe Refurbishment of dilapidated/dangerous memorials at Egham Churchyard £50,000 RBC £4,000 RBC 14.134 The main risks to this type of infrastructure are considered to be threat from development reducing the amount of available land to allow for the expansion of existing cemeteries/provision of new cemeteries in the Borough, and capacity failing to meet future requirements (whether existing cemeteries are extended, or new cemeteries are provided, or not). Whilst Addlestone and Thorpe cemeteries have limited capacity for burials over the plan period, Chertsey and Englefield Green cemeteries have capacity until beyond 2026. As such, whilst there is considered to be a Page | 162 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26:
o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28:
LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30:
Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34:
Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36:
Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38:
Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42:
• The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44:
5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48:
eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50:
IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54:
5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56:
5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58:
Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64:
Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66:
Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70:
• Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72:
IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74:
6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76:
6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78:
Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80:
6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82:
Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84:
6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86:
IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88:
6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92:
above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94:
Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96:
Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98:
Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100:
Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104:
Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106:
Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110:
in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116:
predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118:
• Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 119 and 120:
Costs and funding sources 10.38 The
Page 121 and 122: Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 123 and 124: Costs and funding sources 10.54 The
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128: Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130: IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132: 11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136: Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138: 12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140: Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142: expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144: Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146: percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148: 13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150: Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152: of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154: Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156: with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158: 14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160: 14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162: • Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164: 14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166: 14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168: • reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170: following centres and as part of th
Page 171: 14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178: consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180: 16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182: Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 211 and 212: Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214: Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216: Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218: TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220: Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222: Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?