Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Local Plan The exception to this was Timber Hill where a slight decrease in visitor numbers was found since it was surveyed since 2006. The majority of visitors to the site were found to either arrive on foot or by car. 10.31 The Local Plan confirms in Location Policy 2 (LP02) that the Local Plan will aim to deliver on average 161 units per annum between the years of 2011 and 2026, including 1500 units at the former DERA site. A number of these new dwellings will be within 5km of the TBHSPA. 10.32 Local Plan Core Strategy policy SP07 is concerned with the Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area. The policy replicates DF advice approved by Natural England and currently being followed by the Council that permits the approval of new residential development between 400m and 5km of the Thames Basin Heath SPA. Development at the former DERA site is however singled out by the policy as ‘exceptional’, in that it requires a bespoke solution. The Local Plan's SA/SEA also triggered the requirement for a HRA assessment in relation to policy LP01, LP02 and LP08. Future Provision 10.33 The Council will continue to require, as part of an agreement for the development of new dwellings within the 5 km zone, contributions to enable enhancements to be Borough’s SANGS over the plan period to be funded. In addition, it will be necessary to ensure that existing SANGS are maintained and, as such, a contribution to maintenance will be required. Finally, in recognition of the ability to develop sites, previously constrained by the SPA designation, the Council will require a financial contribution to recognise the value unlocked by allowing development to proceed. At the current time, a flat rate tariff of £1000 per unit in this regard. 10.34 As noted elsewhere in this report, it is forecasted that over the plan period, a maximum of 4512 units could be delivered in the Borough. 3009 of these units would be in the 400m-5km zone of influence for the TBHSPA (zone B). Of these 3009 units, DERA (1500 units) and Franklands Drive (350 units) will provide their own on site SANGS and hence 1850 units need to be deducted. This leaves a possible 1159 units which could potentially be delivered in zone B. A number of these units have already been granted planning permission (although they may not have been erected), and have already paid the necessary financial contributions to safeguard the integrity of the TBHSPA. When these units are also deducted from the total, it is estimated that 699 units could come forward in zone B over the plan period. 10.35 RBC has produced a capital works programme and maintenance schedule for the Borough’s SANGS for the next 5 years. These works will principally involve improving the overall quality of the sites via habitat creation and improvement, and management works. The works planned are detailed in Appendix 4. 10.36 Generally, the quality and amount of the SANGS within the Borough will need to be assessed at regular intervals over the course of the Local Plan to identify whether additional capacity is required to be provided to support increases in the number of residential units within zone B (over and above that amount of development forecasted above), or whether further works are required to ensure the quality of the SANGS is maintained. 10.37 In addition, any development at the former DERA site will provide its own SANG. This is to meet with Natural England’s requirements. Page | 107 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Costs and funding sources 10.38 The cost of providing a new SANG as part of the development at the former DERA site will be met by the developer. The cost of the remainder of the works required to the Borough’s SANGS Funding ID IDPF066 IDPF067 IDPF068 Description Provision of a new SANG as part of the development at the former DERA site Capital works at Timber Hill and Chaworth Copse Capital works at St Ann’s Hill Estimated Cost Unknown Key Provider(s) Crest Nicholson £19,500 over next 5 years RBC £140,000 over next 5 years RBC IDPF069 Capital works at Ottershaw Chase £20,000 over next 5 years RBC IDPF070 Capital works at Ether Hill and Queenwood £51,000 over next 5 years RBC IDPF071 Capital works at Hare Hill £46,000 over 5 years RBC IDPF072 Capital works at Homewood Park £88,500 over 5 years RBC IDPF073 IDPF074 IDPF075 IDPF076 Promotional leaflets at Homewood Park Cost of monitoring/visitor surveys, photo monitoring before and after works and updating/development of site management plans Habitat maintenance management works Reactive maintenance works across all sites £1,250 RBC £64,000 over next 5 years RBC £102,500 over next 5 years RBC £40,000 over 5 years RBC IDPF077 Cost of endowment over plan period £699,000 over plan period Developers TOTAL COSTS £1271,750 (although this total cost is made up of a capital programme of works to the Borough’s SANGS which spans a 5 year period only) 10.39 It should be noted that when forecasting what the cost of providing and maintaining the Borough’s SANGS will be over the entire plan period, clearly, there is an element of uncertainty as to what works will be required as one looks further into the future. If however, the capital works and maintenance works forecasted over the next 5 years (up to 2017) are used to estimate future costs, it is estimated that the cost of the capital works would be in the region of £1,032,600 over the plan period and the planned maintenance works £246,000. The cost of the endowment over the plan period is estimated to be in the region of £699,000. This would make a total of £1,977,600. Clearly however, this figure must be used with caution at this stage, and the cost of the capital and maintenance works will need to be regularly reviewed over the plan period. It should be noted that the cost of the reactive maintenance works have not been factored into this estimation as the Council’s Leisure department has confirmed that it is likely that these works would be required at the sites whether they were designated as SANGs or not. Page | 108 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26:
o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28:
LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30:
Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34:
Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36:
Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38:
Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42:
• The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44:
5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48:
eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50:
IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54:
5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56:
5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58:
Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64:
Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66:
Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68: Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70: • Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72: IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74: 6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76: 6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78: Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80: 6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82: Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84: 6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86: IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88: 6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92: above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94: Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96: Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98: Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104: Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106: Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110: in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114: Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116: predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117: • Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 121 and 122: Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 123 and 124: Costs and funding sources 10.54 The
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128: Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130: IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132: 11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136: Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138: 12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140: Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142: expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144: Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146: percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148: 13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150: Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152: of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154: Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156: with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158: 14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160: 14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162: • Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164: 14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166: 14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168: • reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170:
following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172:
14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174:
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178:
consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180:
16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?