13.01.2015 Views

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Runnymede</strong> and its surrounding areas result in an overall increase in additional traffic<br />

and associated congestion on the non strategic road network. It is likely however that<br />

the TIA will conclude that any potential increase will not cause a material increase in<br />

traffic flow on the network or at M25 Junctions 11 and 12. As such, the Local <strong>Plan</strong> will<br />

not result in an unacceptable level of congestion at these junctions. The risk of<br />

IDPR009 is therefore considered to be low, and the severity is considered to be<br />

medium.<br />

6.50 Three risks were identified which are summarised in the table below.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Risk ID Description Probability Severity<br />

IDPR007<br />

IDPR008<br />

IDPR009<br />

Failure to achieve sustainable<br />

transport strategy<br />

Effect of climate change on network<br />

capacity<br />

Cumulative impact on SRN M25<br />

J11 and 12<br />

High<br />

Medium<br />

Low<br />

High<br />

High<br />

Medium<br />

6.51 Development proposals over the course of the Local <strong>Plan</strong> are likely to place additional<br />

pressure on the non-strategic road network that serves the <strong>Borough</strong>. With the<br />

exception of some localised issues (in this regard, the County <strong>Council</strong> has indicated<br />

that it would be desirable to have some improvements to the network that will address<br />

safety and localised congestion over the plan period), it is highly likely that the TIA<br />

2012 will conclude that the overall increase in traffic growth over the plan period within<br />

<strong>Runnymede</strong>, in combination with other similar developments will not significantly affect<br />

this infrastructures capacity. Therefore, although congestion is likely to increase at<br />

peak hours, the distribution of new development across the <strong>Borough</strong> over the plan<br />

period (including that being proposed for the DERA site) is unlikely to affect this<br />

conclusion. The preliminary conclusions which have been drawn in this chapter will<br />

however need to be confirmed by the TIA.<br />

6.52 Of the three identified risks identified above, IDPR007 is likely to be the only one that<br />

the <strong>Borough</strong> could reasonably influence as the other risks are outside the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

control.<br />

Rail infrastructure<br />

Existing conditions<br />

6.53 The majority of rail infrastructure is the responsibility of Network Rail, with services<br />

being provided by Train Operating Companies (TOC’s) under franchise agreements<br />

with the Department for Transport (DfT). <strong>Runnymede</strong> has 6 railway stations:<br />

Addlestone, Chertsey, Virginia Water, Egham, Byfleet and New Haw, and, Longcross.<br />

All of these stations are believed to be leased from Network Rail by South West Trains<br />

(See Figure 15).<br />

Page | 61<br />

<strong>Runnymede</strong> IDP DRAFT – <strong>Feb</strong>ruary <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!