Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Runnymede</strong> and its surrounding areas result in an overall increase in additional traffic<br />
and associated congestion on the non strategic road network. It is likely however that<br />
the TIA will conclude that any potential increase will not cause a material increase in<br />
traffic flow on the network or at M25 Junctions 11 and 12. As such, the Local <strong>Plan</strong> will<br />
not result in an unacceptable level of congestion at these junctions. The risk of<br />
IDPR009 is therefore considered to be low, and the severity is considered to be<br />
medium.<br />
6.50 Three risks were identified which are summarised in the table below.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Risk ID Description Probability Severity<br />
IDPR007<br />
IDPR008<br />
IDPR009<br />
Failure to achieve sustainable<br />
transport strategy<br />
Effect of climate change on network<br />
capacity<br />
Cumulative impact on SRN M25<br />
J11 and 12<br />
High<br />
Medium<br />
Low<br />
High<br />
High<br />
Medium<br />
6.51 Development proposals over the course of the Local <strong>Plan</strong> are likely to place additional<br />
pressure on the non-strategic road network that serves the <strong>Borough</strong>. With the<br />
exception of some localised issues (in this regard, the County <strong>Council</strong> has indicated<br />
that it would be desirable to have some improvements to the network that will address<br />
safety and localised congestion over the plan period), it is highly likely that the TIA<br />
2012 will conclude that the overall increase in traffic growth over the plan period within<br />
<strong>Runnymede</strong>, in combination with other similar developments will not significantly affect<br />
this infrastructures capacity. Therefore, although congestion is likely to increase at<br />
peak hours, the distribution of new development across the <strong>Borough</strong> over the plan<br />
period (including that being proposed for the DERA site) is unlikely to affect this<br />
conclusion. The preliminary conclusions which have been drawn in this chapter will<br />
however need to be confirmed by the TIA.<br />
6.52 Of the three identified risks identified above, IDPR007 is likely to be the only one that<br />
the <strong>Borough</strong> could reasonably influence as the other risks are outside the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
control.<br />
Rail infrastructure<br />
Existing conditions<br />
6.53 The majority of rail infrastructure is the responsibility of Network Rail, with services<br />
being provided by Train Operating Companies (TOC’s) under franchise agreements<br />
with the Department for Transport (DfT). <strong>Runnymede</strong> has 6 railway stations:<br />
Addlestone, Chertsey, Virginia Water, Egham, Byfleet and New Haw, and, Longcross.<br />
All of these stations are believed to be leased from Network Rail by South West Trains<br />
(See Figure 15).<br />
Page | 61<br />
<strong>Runnymede</strong> IDP DRAFT – <strong>Feb</strong>ruary <strong>2013</strong>