Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Judiciary – Key Decisi<strong>on</strong>s Victim Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r below, <strong>the</strong> Registry acknowledged this<br />
issue by filing a proposal for an ‘alternative<br />
approach’ to victim participati<strong>on</strong> at <strong>the</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>firmati<strong>on</strong> hearing, 1688 whereby <strong>the</strong> views<br />
and c<strong>on</strong>cerns of unprocessed applicants for<br />
victim participati<strong>on</strong> could be submitted to <strong>the</strong><br />
Chamber under <strong>the</strong> category of ‘o<strong>the</strong>r victims’,<br />
taken from <strong>the</strong> language of Rule 93 of <strong>the</strong> Rules<br />
of Procedure and Evidence. 1689 In resp<strong>on</strong>se to <strong>the</strong><br />
Registry’s filing, Pre-Trial Chamber I held that<br />
Rule 93, although technically applicable, was<br />
inappropriate in <strong>the</strong> circumstances and would<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly allow for a limited form of participati<strong>on</strong><br />
for <strong>the</strong> applicants in questi<strong>on</strong>. 1690 Likewise,<br />
<strong>the</strong> volume of unprocessed applicati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> have led to complaints from <strong>the</strong><br />
parties to <strong>the</strong> case, particularly <strong>the</strong> Defence,<br />
regarding <strong>the</strong> burden placed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties<br />
when hundreds of applicati<strong>on</strong>s for participati<strong>on</strong><br />
are transmitted (and <strong>the</strong>refore require analysis<br />
and observati<strong>on</strong>s) at <strong>on</strong>ce, and must be dealt<br />
with al<strong>on</strong>gside o<strong>the</strong>r pressing legal issues such<br />
as witness preparati<strong>on</strong> or pre-trial procedural<br />
filings. 1691<br />
1688 ICC-01/04-01/10-213, paras 7-15.<br />
1689 Rule 93 states <strong>the</strong> following: ‘A Chamber may seek<br />
<strong>the</strong> views of victims or <strong>the</strong>ir legal representatives<br />
participating pursuant to 89 to 91 <strong>on</strong> any issue… In<br />
additi<strong>on</strong>, a Chamber may seek <strong>the</strong> views of o<strong>the</strong>r victims,<br />
as appropriate.’<br />
1690 ICC-01/04-01/10-229.<br />
1691 See for example <strong>the</strong> May 2011 Defence successful<br />
moti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Mbarushimana case that <strong>the</strong> Chamber<br />
should refuse to allow <strong>the</strong> Registry to transmit any<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r applicati<strong>on</strong>s for victim participati<strong>on</strong> outside<br />
<strong>the</strong> initial deadline but prior to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>firmati<strong>on</strong> of<br />
charges hearing (ICC-01/04-01/10-169) and <strong>the</strong> Defence<br />
objecti<strong>on</strong>s filed in <strong>the</strong> Bemba case in relati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong><br />
burden caused to <strong>the</strong> parties by <strong>the</strong> timing and volume<br />
of <strong>the</strong> transmissi<strong>on</strong> of applicati<strong>on</strong>s for participati<strong>on</strong><br />
by <strong>the</strong> VPRS (ICC-01/05-01/08-1413). Trial Chamber III’s<br />
decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmissi<strong>on</strong> of applicati<strong>on</strong>s for victim<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> VPRS in <strong>the</strong> Bemba case is discussed<br />
in greater detail below.<br />
Breakdown of participants by<br />
Situati<strong>on</strong> 1692<br />
Pursuant to Article 68 of <strong>the</strong> Rome Statute,<br />
victims may apply for and be granted <strong>the</strong> right<br />
to participate at all stages of proceedings<br />
before <strong>the</strong> Court, including <strong>the</strong> pre-trial, trial<br />
and appeal phases, but, in practice, <strong>the</strong> Court’s<br />
jurisprudence has limited <strong>the</strong> potential for<br />
victims to enjoy a general right to participate<br />
at <strong>the</strong> Situati<strong>on</strong> stage of proceedings. In<br />
December 2008 and February 2009, <strong>the</strong> Appeals<br />
Chamber issued two important decisi<strong>on</strong>s in<br />
<strong>the</strong> DRC and Darfur Situati<strong>on</strong>s rejecting <strong>the</strong><br />
granting of participati<strong>on</strong> rights to victims at <strong>the</strong><br />
investigati<strong>on</strong> stage of a Situati<strong>on</strong> and holding<br />
that <strong>the</strong>re must be specific judicial proceedings<br />
capable of affecting <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>al interests of <strong>the</strong><br />
victims before <strong>the</strong>y can be granted <strong>the</strong> right to<br />
participate. 1693 These decisi<strong>on</strong>s temporarily put<br />
an end to <strong>the</strong> granting of participati<strong>on</strong> rights<br />
to new victim applicants at <strong>the</strong> Situati<strong>on</strong> stage,<br />
although <strong>the</strong>y did not affect <strong>the</strong> status of victims<br />
who had already been accepted to participate in<br />
relati<strong>on</strong> to a Situati<strong>on</strong> before <strong>the</strong> Court. This year,<br />
decisi<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> DRC, CAR and Kenya Situati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
discussed in more detail below, set out <strong>the</strong><br />
procedural framework to be followed in relati<strong>on</strong><br />
to new and future applicati<strong>on</strong>s for victim<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> in specific judicial proceedings at<br />
<strong>the</strong> Situati<strong>on</strong> stage. Under <strong>the</strong> current system<br />
of victim participati<strong>on</strong> at <strong>the</strong> Court, victims who<br />
have suffered harm caused by <strong>the</strong> commissi<strong>on</strong> of<br />
crimes within <strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Court may<br />
apply to participate at <strong>the</strong> Situati<strong>on</strong> stage, while<br />
victims who have suffered harm as a result of<br />
specific crimes included in <strong>the</strong> charges against<br />
a suspect or accused pers<strong>on</strong> can also apply to<br />
participate in that specific case. 1694<br />
1692 These figures are accurate as of 30 August 2011.<br />
1693 ICC-01/04-556 and ICC-02/05-177. See fur<strong>the</strong>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>Gender</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Card</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2009, p 99-100.<br />
1694 See .<br />
275