19.01.2015 Views

Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada

Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada

Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Judiciary – Key Decisi<strong>on</strong>s Victim Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r below, <strong>the</strong> Registry acknowledged this<br />

issue by filing a proposal for an ‘alternative<br />

approach’ to victim participati<strong>on</strong> at <strong>the</strong><br />

c<strong>on</strong>firmati<strong>on</strong> hearing, 1688 whereby <strong>the</strong> views<br />

and c<strong>on</strong>cerns of unprocessed applicants for<br />

victim participati<strong>on</strong> could be submitted to <strong>the</strong><br />

Chamber under <strong>the</strong> category of ‘o<strong>the</strong>r victims’,<br />

taken from <strong>the</strong> language of Rule 93 of <strong>the</strong> Rules<br />

of Procedure and Evidence. 1689 In resp<strong>on</strong>se to <strong>the</strong><br />

Registry’s filing, Pre-Trial Chamber I held that<br />

Rule 93, although technically applicable, was<br />

inappropriate in <strong>the</strong> circumstances and would<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly allow for a limited form of participati<strong>on</strong><br />

for <strong>the</strong> applicants in questi<strong>on</strong>. 1690 Likewise,<br />

<strong>the</strong> volume of unprocessed applicati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />

participati<strong>on</strong> have led to complaints from <strong>the</strong><br />

parties to <strong>the</strong> case, particularly <strong>the</strong> Defence,<br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> burden placed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties<br />

when hundreds of applicati<strong>on</strong>s for participati<strong>on</strong><br />

are transmitted (and <strong>the</strong>refore require analysis<br />

and observati<strong>on</strong>s) at <strong>on</strong>ce, and must be dealt<br />

with al<strong>on</strong>gside o<strong>the</strong>r pressing legal issues such<br />

as witness preparati<strong>on</strong> or pre-trial procedural<br />

filings. 1691<br />

1688 ICC-01/04-01/10-213, paras 7-15.<br />

1689 Rule 93 states <strong>the</strong> following: ‘A Chamber may seek<br />

<strong>the</strong> views of victims or <strong>the</strong>ir legal representatives<br />

participating pursuant to 89 to 91 <strong>on</strong> any issue… In<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>, a Chamber may seek <strong>the</strong> views of o<strong>the</strong>r victims,<br />

as appropriate.’<br />

1690 ICC-01/04-01/10-229.<br />

1691 See for example <strong>the</strong> May 2011 Defence successful<br />

moti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Mbarushimana case that <strong>the</strong> Chamber<br />

should refuse to allow <strong>the</strong> Registry to transmit any<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r applicati<strong>on</strong>s for victim participati<strong>on</strong> outside<br />

<strong>the</strong> initial deadline but prior to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>firmati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

charges hearing (ICC-01/04-01/10-169) and <strong>the</strong> Defence<br />

objecti<strong>on</strong>s filed in <strong>the</strong> Bemba case in relati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong><br />

burden caused to <strong>the</strong> parties by <strong>the</strong> timing and volume<br />

of <strong>the</strong> transmissi<strong>on</strong> of applicati<strong>on</strong>s for participati<strong>on</strong><br />

by <strong>the</strong> VPRS (ICC-01/05-01/08-1413). Trial Chamber III’s<br />

decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmissi<strong>on</strong> of applicati<strong>on</strong>s for victim<br />

participati<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> VPRS in <strong>the</strong> Bemba case is discussed<br />

in greater detail below.<br />

Breakdown of participants by<br />

Situati<strong>on</strong> 1692<br />

Pursuant to Article 68 of <strong>the</strong> Rome Statute,<br />

victims may apply for and be granted <strong>the</strong> right<br />

to participate at all stages of proceedings<br />

before <strong>the</strong> Court, including <strong>the</strong> pre-trial, trial<br />

and appeal phases, but, in practice, <strong>the</strong> Court’s<br />

jurisprudence has limited <strong>the</strong> potential for<br />

victims to enjoy a general right to participate<br />

at <strong>the</strong> Situati<strong>on</strong> stage of proceedings. In<br />

December 2008 and February 2009, <strong>the</strong> Appeals<br />

Chamber issued two important decisi<strong>on</strong>s in<br />

<strong>the</strong> DRC and Darfur Situati<strong>on</strong>s rejecting <strong>the</strong><br />

granting of participati<strong>on</strong> rights to victims at <strong>the</strong><br />

investigati<strong>on</strong> stage of a Situati<strong>on</strong> and holding<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re must be specific judicial proceedings<br />

capable of affecting <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>al interests of <strong>the</strong><br />

victims before <strong>the</strong>y can be granted <strong>the</strong> right to<br />

participate. 1693 These decisi<strong>on</strong>s temporarily put<br />

an end to <strong>the</strong> granting of participati<strong>on</strong> rights<br />

to new victim applicants at <strong>the</strong> Situati<strong>on</strong> stage,<br />

although <strong>the</strong>y did not affect <strong>the</strong> status of victims<br />

who had already been accepted to participate in<br />

relati<strong>on</strong> to a Situati<strong>on</strong> before <strong>the</strong> Court. This year,<br />

decisi<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> DRC, CAR and Kenya Situati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

discussed in more detail below, set out <strong>the</strong><br />

procedural framework to be followed in relati<strong>on</strong><br />

to new and future applicati<strong>on</strong>s for victim<br />

participati<strong>on</strong> in specific judicial proceedings at<br />

<strong>the</strong> Situati<strong>on</strong> stage. Under <strong>the</strong> current system<br />

of victim participati<strong>on</strong> at <strong>the</strong> Court, victims who<br />

have suffered harm caused by <strong>the</strong> commissi<strong>on</strong> of<br />

crimes within <strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Court may<br />

apply to participate at <strong>the</strong> Situati<strong>on</strong> stage, while<br />

victims who have suffered harm as a result of<br />

specific crimes included in <strong>the</strong> charges against<br />

a suspect or accused pers<strong>on</strong> can also apply to<br />

participate in that specific case. 1694<br />

1692 These figures are accurate as of 30 August 2011.<br />

1693 ICC-01/04-556 and ICC-02/05-177. See fur<strong>the</strong>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>Gender</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Card</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2009, p 99-100.<br />

1694 See .<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!