Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
Gender Report Card on the International Criminal ... - YWCA Canada
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Judiciary – Key Decisi<strong>on</strong>s Legal Representati<strong>on</strong><br />
Decisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> Victims’<br />
Legal Representati<strong>on</strong><br />
In order to act as <strong>the</strong> legal representative of<br />
victims, an individual must comply with <strong>the</strong><br />
requirements of <strong>the</strong> Rules of Procedure and<br />
Evidence and <strong>the</strong> Regulati<strong>on</strong>s relating to legal<br />
counsel. Regulati<strong>on</strong> 67 requires at least ten years<br />
necessary relevant experience as counsel, and<br />
also provides that ‘counsel should not have been<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victed of a serious criminal or disciplinary<br />
offence c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be incompatible with<br />
<strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> office of counsel before <strong>the</strong><br />
Court’. 1849 To be included <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> List of Counsel<br />
maintained by <strong>the</strong> Registry, an individual must<br />
provide proof of specific relevant informati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
including a certificate from <strong>the</strong> Bar associati<strong>on</strong><br />
or relevant administrative authority <strong>the</strong><br />
individual is registered with c<strong>on</strong>firming that<br />
pers<strong>on</strong>’s qualificati<strong>on</strong>s, right to practise, and <strong>the</strong><br />
existence (if any) of any disciplinary sancti<strong>on</strong>s or<br />
<strong>on</strong>going disciplinary proceedings against <strong>the</strong>m,<br />
as well as a certificate from <strong>the</strong> relevant State<br />
authority c<strong>on</strong>firming <strong>the</strong> existence (if any) of any<br />
criminal c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s against that pers<strong>on</strong>. 1850 The<br />
individual seeking to be admitted as counsel has<br />
an obligati<strong>on</strong> to inform <strong>the</strong> Registry about any<br />
changes to <strong>the</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>y have provided<br />
regarding <strong>the</strong>ir qualificati<strong>on</strong>s as counsel, 1851<br />
including <strong>the</strong> initiati<strong>on</strong> of any criminal or<br />
disciplinary proceedings against <strong>the</strong>m. 1852<br />
An important aspect in creating a system<br />
of victim participati<strong>on</strong> that is, above all,<br />
meaningful for victims, is ensuring that <strong>the</strong><br />
interests and c<strong>on</strong>cerns of victims are adequately<br />
represented at trial by <strong>the</strong>ir legal representative.<br />
Due to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>certed trend of increases in<br />
applicati<strong>on</strong>s for victim participati<strong>on</strong> at <strong>the</strong><br />
1849 Regulati<strong>on</strong> 67(2).<br />
1850 Regulati<strong>on</strong>s 69(2) and 70.<br />
1851 Regulati<strong>on</strong> 69(3).<br />
1852 For more informati<strong>on</strong> about <strong>the</strong> ICC’s List of Legal<br />
Counsel, see <strong>the</strong> Structures and Instituti<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Development secti<strong>on</strong> of this <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>, as well as <strong>the</strong><br />
Structures and Instituti<strong>on</strong>al Development secti<strong>on</strong>’s<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Court, as described in more detail in <strong>the</strong> secti<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>on</strong> Victim Participati<strong>on</strong> of this <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>the</strong> Court<br />
has been faced with challenges in balancing<br />
<strong>the</strong> efficient c<strong>on</strong>duct of proceedings, <strong>the</strong> rights<br />
of <strong>the</strong> accused to an expeditious and fair trial<br />
and <strong>the</strong> rights of victims to have <strong>the</strong>ir views<br />
and c<strong>on</strong>cerns represented in <strong>the</strong> proceedings.<br />
This has presented particular challenges for <strong>the</strong><br />
organisati<strong>on</strong> of victims’ legal representati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Pursuant to Rule 90(1) of <strong>the</strong> Rules of Procedure<br />
and Evidence ‘a victim shall be free to choose<br />
a legal representative’. Trial Chamber II in <strong>the</strong><br />
Katanga & Ngudjolo case, in a decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />
comm<strong>on</strong> legal representati<strong>on</strong> of 22 July 2009,<br />
reaffirmed victims’ right to choose a legal<br />
representative, but stressed that this was<br />
subject to <strong>the</strong> Chamber’s discreti<strong>on</strong> with a<br />
view to guaranteeing <strong>the</strong> efficient c<strong>on</strong>duct of<br />
proceedings. The Chamber ruled that:<br />
Although victims are free to choose<br />
a legal representative this right is<br />
subject to <strong>the</strong> important practical,<br />
financial, infrastructural and logistical<br />
c<strong>on</strong>straints faced by <strong>the</strong> Court.<br />
Comm<strong>on</strong> legal representati<strong>on</strong> is<br />
<strong>the</strong> primary procedural mechanism<br />
for rec<strong>on</strong>ciling <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>flicting<br />
requirements of having fair and<br />
expeditious proceedings, whilst at<br />
<strong>the</strong> same time ensuring meaningful<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> by potentially thousands<br />
of victims, all within <strong>the</strong> bounds<br />
of what is practically possible. The<br />
Chamber c<strong>on</strong>siders, <strong>the</strong>refore, that <strong>the</strong><br />
freedom to choose a pers<strong>on</strong>al legal<br />
representative, set out in rule 90(1)<br />
is qualified by rule 90(2) and subject<br />
to <strong>the</strong> inherent and express powers<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Chamber to take all measures<br />
necessary if <strong>the</strong> interests of justice so<br />
require. 1853<br />
1853 ICC-01/04-01/07-1328, para 11.<br />
294