01.02.2015 Views

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114 <strong>Presuppositions</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pronouns</strong><br />

So according to the satisfaction theory, what we accommodate is<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation rather than objects or representations of objects. This difference<br />

is not by itself decisive, however. The decisive difference lies in the way a link<br />

is established between presupposed <strong>and</strong> accommodated in<strong>for</strong>mation. In the<br />

binding theory this connection is simple enough: it is the presupposition<br />

itself that must be accommodated, which is natural because presuppositions<br />

are viewed as objects. However, the satisfaction theory views a<br />

presupposition not just as in<strong>for</strong>mation but as in<strong>for</strong>mation which is needed in<br />

the local context in which the presupposition arises. The local context of a<br />

presupposition X % is denoted by an expression of the <strong>for</strong>m c[9 0, <strong>and</strong> if the global context c must be revised so as to let X % be defined in its<br />

local context c[ cfcpjfq^]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!