01.02.2015 Views

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Presupposition 33<br />

of this complexity, it is natural that the interlocutors will concentrate their<br />

attention on selected parts of the content conveyed by an utterance; the rest<br />

is of secondary importance, it is backgrounded. There may be many factors<br />

that can influence this selection process, but once the focal points have been<br />

identified, what remains tends to be presupposed.<br />

This picture is admittedly vague, <strong>and</strong> it certainly does not deserves to be<br />

called a theory, but it is not entirely without substance. The main idea is that,<br />

although there may be many different reasons <strong>for</strong> backgrounding part of the<br />

content of an expression, what is judged to be of secondary interest will be<br />

presupposed if it can be presupposed. This allows us make some sense of the<br />

bewildering variety of presupposition triggers. It may be that, say, factives<br />

<strong>and</strong> aspectual verbs have little in common. But both types of expressions<br />

focus on certain parts of the in<strong>for</strong>mation they contain, <strong>and</strong> allow the<br />

remainder to be presupposed, <strong>and</strong> if I am right, this is why it will be<br />

presupposed. It will be evident that there is much more to say about this<br />

subject. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, however, I don't have much more to say about it.<br />

1.6 A note on presupposition failure<br />

Of the three main problems that I mentioned at the beginning of this chapter,<br />

the problem of presupposition failure is the oldest, <strong>and</strong> in my opinion it is<br />

also the least interesting. What happens if a presupposition turns out to be<br />

false Suppose that Betty isn't married. Is (68) then false or just meaningless<br />

Will a speaker who uttered this sentence have said something in any non-<br />

nontrivial<br />

sense of the word, or not<br />

(68) Betty's husb<strong>and</strong> is a teetotaler.<br />

It is over questions like these that the famous battles between Fregeans,<br />

Russellians, <strong>and</strong> Strawsonians have raged, but despite the controversy<br />

caused by the issue of presupposition failure, I feel that its importance has<br />

been overrated. To begin with, taking a purely observational stance, it is by<br />

no means clear what the issue is supposed to be, with in<strong>for</strong>mants being<br />

inconsistent over what the consequences of presupposition failure are. Given<br />

that Betty isn't married, some native speakers of English will say that (68) is<br />

false, while others will prefer to say that it doesn't make any sense. The<br />

empirical bottom line is that the opinions about the effects of presupposition<br />

failure are divided, <strong>and</strong> to the extent that a consensus can be attained, it<br />

appears that speakers' intuitions are dependent on contextual factors of a<br />

such a kind that only further doubt is cast upon the presumption that there is<br />

a substantial issue. At any rate, this is the moral I draw from Strawson's

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!