Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Names 211<br />
have names; some of these I have chosen myself, others have been chosen by<br />
various people around the globe, only some of whom I am acquainted with,<br />
<strong>and</strong> yet others, such as cache183415.shtml cache!83415.shtml <strong>for</strong> example, were generated by<br />
some program. The association between a file <strong>and</strong> its name is entirely<br />
sustained by the computer's hardware <strong>and</strong> the programs running on it: if due<br />
to some programming error the file name Bocherini gets changed into<br />
Corelli, then the file's name IS is Corelli, not Bocherini. The baptist's original<br />
intention is simply irrelevant.<br />
The expression 'bearing a name' covers as many relations as there are<br />
naming practices, <strong>and</strong> it seems to me that Kripke's causal theory of reference<br />
is best viewed, not as a theory of reference, but as a partial theory of what it<br />
means to bear a name. The theory is only a partial one because there are<br />
naming practices that it doesn't account <strong>for</strong>, such as the one considered in the<br />
previous paragraph.<br />
Kripke's charge that the quotation theory is circular can now be countered<br />
a second time, as follows. Even if a proponent of the quotation theory should<br />
want to explain how names can be used to refer, his analysis of names need<br />
not be circular, because the notion of reference need not enter into it: 'the<br />
individual named N' is not the same as 'the individual that N refers to', <strong>and</strong><br />
the <strong>for</strong>mer does not presuppose the latter, either.<br />
7.3 Names as presupposition inducers<br />
On the presuppositional analysis of definiteness that I have taken more or<br />
less <strong>for</strong> granted in the <strong>for</strong>egoing chapters, a definite NP of the <strong>for</strong>m 'the N'<br />
triggers the presupposition that N is given, <strong>and</strong> that is all there is to say about<br />
the meaning of definite NPs. Such NPs are purely presuppositional<br />
expressions, one might say, in that they presuppose their entire descriptive<br />
content (ct. (cf. § 1.4). On the presuppositional version of the quotation theory<br />
that I propose, names, too, are purely presuppositional expressions. The<br />
descriptive content of a name N is 'individual named N', <strong>and</strong> the name<br />
triggers the presupposition that an individual answering this description is<br />
given.<br />
Let us see how this version of the quotation theory measures up to the<br />
observations presented in § 7.1. The first five of these observations hardly<br />
need any comment. Given that names are treated on a par with overt definite<br />
NPs, it doesn't come as a surprise that:<br />
• names often carry definiteness markers;<br />
• names are subject to definiteness restrictions;<br />
• the referential/attributive distinction applies to names;