Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Presupposition 11<br />
judgment of the facts is based upon the presupposition that they are<br />
true; such presuppositions are unwise.<br />
This may not seem to be very instructive, yet it is useful to be reminded that<br />
presupposition is a deverbal noun, <strong>and</strong> that one speaks of presuppositions in<br />
order to characterize not sentences or words but people <strong>and</strong> what they do.<br />
Presupposition, according to Longman's dictionary, is either the action of<br />
presupposing or its object. But what does it mean to presuppose something<br />
pre-sup-pose pre'sup«pose /,pri:ss'psuz/ /,pri:s9'p9oz/ v [T1, [Tl, 5] 1 to suppose or take to be true<br />
without trying to find out: A scientist never presupposes the truth of<br />
an unproved fact 2 to be necessary as something that comes be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
(something else) according to reason: A child presupposes a mother.<br />
I An honour given to a person presupposes that he has earned it.<br />
Now, although I hold Longman's dictionary in high esteem, it seems to me<br />
that the second sense listed here is marginal at best. A child doesn't<br />
presupposes a mother any more than a sentence presupposes a sentence. Be<br />
that as it may, it is evidently the first meaning that is the primary one, <strong>and</strong> it<br />
says that to presuppose something is to take it <strong>for</strong> granted. Again,<br />
presupposing is something people do, <strong>and</strong> it is not necessarily verbal<br />
behaviour, although it may be that it is typically expressed by linguistic<br />
means.<br />
This folk concept of presupposition is the basis <strong>for</strong> the theory that I present<br />
in this book. The theory has its roots in a triad of papers by Stalnaker<br />
published in the first half of the seventies (i.e. Stalnaker 1970, 1973, <strong>and</strong><br />
1974). In keeping with the layman's view, Stalnaker's starting point is that<br />
presupposition is a 'propositional 'prepositional attitude', which is to be understood in<br />
behaviourial terms:<br />
A speaker presupposes that P at a given moment in a conversation<br />
just in case he is disposed to act, in his linguistic behavior, as if he<br />
takes the truth of P <strong>for</strong> granted, <strong>and</strong> as if he assumes that his<br />
audience recognizes that he is doing so. (Stalnaker 1973: 448)<br />
To presuppose something is like making a promise. If I promise my daughter<br />
to buy her an ice cream, it is completely irrelevant what my actual beliefs <strong>and</strong><br />
intentions are: I made a promise regardless whether I intended to keep it or<br />
not. Likewise, a speaker who presupposes something incurs a commitment<br />
(to use Hamblin's expression) regardless whether he really believes what he<br />
presupposes. To be sure, presuppositions are normally believed to be true,<br />
but belief is not a prerequisite <strong>for</strong> presupposition.<br />
Presupposition is the dual of assertion, <strong>and</strong> if the <strong>for</strong>mer is a prepositional<br />
propositional<br />
attitude, then so is the latter, <strong>and</strong> in the same sense. Like presupposition,<br />
assertion implies commitment, not true belief. If a story teller asserts that the