01.02.2015 Views

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Presupposition 11<br />

judgment of the facts is based upon the presupposition that they are<br />

true; such presuppositions are unwise.<br />

This may not seem to be very instructive, yet it is useful to be reminded that<br />

presupposition is a deverbal noun, <strong>and</strong> that one speaks of presuppositions in<br />

order to characterize not sentences or words but people <strong>and</strong> what they do.<br />

Presupposition, according to Longman's dictionary, is either the action of<br />

presupposing or its object. But what does it mean to presuppose something<br />

pre-sup-pose pre'sup«pose /,pri:ss'psuz/ /,pri:s9'p9oz/ v [T1, [Tl, 5] 1 to suppose or take to be true<br />

without trying to find out: A scientist never presupposes the truth of<br />

an unproved fact 2 to be necessary as something that comes be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

(something else) according to reason: A child presupposes a mother.<br />

I An honour given to a person presupposes that he has earned it.<br />

Now, although I hold Longman's dictionary in high esteem, it seems to me<br />

that the second sense listed here is marginal at best. A child doesn't<br />

presupposes a mother any more than a sentence presupposes a sentence. Be<br />

that as it may, it is evidently the first meaning that is the primary one, <strong>and</strong> it<br />

says that to presuppose something is to take it <strong>for</strong> granted. Again,<br />

presupposing is something people do, <strong>and</strong> it is not necessarily verbal<br />

behaviour, although it may be that it is typically expressed by linguistic<br />

means.<br />

This folk concept of presupposition is the basis <strong>for</strong> the theory that I present<br />

in this book. The theory has its roots in a triad of papers by Stalnaker<br />

published in the first half of the seventies (i.e. Stalnaker 1970, 1973, <strong>and</strong><br />

1974). In keeping with the layman's view, Stalnaker's starting point is that<br />

presupposition is a 'propositional 'prepositional attitude', which is to be understood in<br />

behaviourial terms:<br />

A speaker presupposes that P at a given moment in a conversation<br />

just in case he is disposed to act, in his linguistic behavior, as if he<br />

takes the truth of P <strong>for</strong> granted, <strong>and</strong> as if he assumes that his<br />

audience recognizes that he is doing so. (Stalnaker 1973: 448)<br />

To presuppose something is like making a promise. If I promise my daughter<br />

to buy her an ice cream, it is completely irrelevant what my actual beliefs <strong>and</strong><br />

intentions are: I made a promise regardless whether I intended to keep it or<br />

not. Likewise, a speaker who presupposes something incurs a commitment<br />

(to use Hamblin's expression) regardless whether he really believes what he<br />

presupposes. To be sure, presuppositions are normally believed to be true,<br />

but belief is not a prerequisite <strong>for</strong> presupposition.<br />

Presupposition is the dual of assertion, <strong>and</strong> if the <strong>for</strong>mer is a prepositional<br />

propositional<br />

attitude, then so is the latter, <strong>and</strong> in the same sense. Like presupposition,<br />

assertion implies commitment, not true belief. If a story teller asserts that the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!