Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 229 Zeevat, H. 1989a: A compositional approach to discourse representation theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 95-131. Zeevat, H. 1989b: Realism and definiteness. In: G. Chierchia, B.H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning, Vol. 2. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Pp. 269-297. Zeevat, H. 1991: Aspects of Discourse Semantics and Unification Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Zeevat, H. 1992: Presupposition and accommodation in update semantics. Journal of Semantics disserta- 9: 379-412. 379^12. Zeevat, H. 1996: A neoclassical analysis of belief sentences. Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium. University of Amsterdam. Pp. 723-742.
This page intentionally left blank
Page 2 and 3:
Presuppositions and Pronouns
Page 4 and 5:
PRESUPPOSITIONS AND PRONOUNS Bart G
Page 6 and 7:
Current Research in the Semantics/P
Page 8 and 9:
To Julia
Page 10 and 11:
Contents PREFACE xi 1 PRESUPPOSITIO
Page 12 and 13:
Preface In his thumbnail sketch of
Page 14 and 15:
xiii presuppositions already involv
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 1 Presupposition The phenom
Page 18 and 19:
Presupposition 3 c. If Barney has s
Page 20 and 21:
Presupposition 5 apply to their int
Page 22 and 23:
Presupposition 17 sentences in (15)
Page 24 and 25:
Presupposition 9 there is a way of
Page 26 and 27:
Presupposition 11 judgment of the f
Page 28 and 29:
Presupposition 13 that requires a m
Page 30 and 31:
Presupposition 15 b. If Barney took
Page 32 and 33:
Presupposition 17 conditionals have
Page 34 and 35:
Presupposition 19 pizzeria in the V
Page 36 and 37:
Presupposition 21 recipient of this
Page 38 and 39:
Presupposition 23 (45) Fred's wife
Page 40 and 41:
Presupposition 25 (51) [the x: King
Page 42 and 43:
Presupposition 27 readings in terms
Page 44 and 45:
Presupposition 29 actually has a nu
Page 46 and 47:
Presupposition 31 describes a trans
Page 48 and 49:
Presupposition 33 of this complexit
Page 50 and 51:
CHAPTER 2 The binding theory Althou
Page 52 and 53:
The binding theory 37 b. [y,.w: [v,
Page 54 and 55:
The binding theory 39 correlated wi
Page 56 and 57:
The binding theory 41 (10) a. Eithe
Page 58 and 59:
The binding theory 43 The content o
Page 60 and 61:
d. j [.
Page 62 and 63:
The binding theory 47 apply. Soames
Page 64 and 65:
The binding theory 49 Disjunction '
Page 66 and 67:
The binding theory 51 me from sayin
Page 68 and 69:
The binding theory 53 (35) a. [u, v
Page 70 and 71:
The binding theory 55 line, presupp
Page 72 and 73:
The binding theory 57 We are now al
Page 74 and 75:
The binding theory 59 interpretatio
Page 76 and 77:
The binding theory 61 accommodation
Page 78 and 79:
The binding theory 63 sentence (i.e
Page 80 and 81:
The binding theory 65 In the preced
Page 82 and 83:
The binding theory 67 presuppositio
Page 84 and 85:
The binding theory 69 Our procedure
Page 86 and 87:
The binding theory 71 c. (Esker too
Page 88 and 89:
The binding theory 73 (67) The doct
Page 90 and 91:
The binding theory 75 an umbrella,
Page 92 and 93:
The binding theory 77 and although
Page 94 and 95:
The binding theory 79 any given pre
Page 96 and 97:
The binding theory 81 marker x in t
Page 98 and 99:
The binding theory 83 In the versio
Page 100 and 101:
The binding theory 85 (88) a. Did y
Page 102 and 103:
CHAPTER 3 The satisfaction theory C
Page 104 and 105:
The satisfaction theory 89 Accordin
Page 106 and 107:
The satisfaction theory 91 b. c[(p
Page 108 and 109:
The satisfaction theory 93 (7) Eith
Page 110 and 111:
The satisfaction theory 95 conditio
Page 112 and 113:
The satisfaction theory 97 § 3.4 a
Page 114 and 115:
The satisfaction theory 99 merely p
Page 116 and 117:
The satisfaction theory 101 All I h
Page 118 and 119:
The satisfaction theory 103 I belie
Page 120 and 121:
The satisfaction theory 105 Karttun
Page 122 and 123:
The satisfaction theory 107 implies
Page 124 and 125:
The satisfaction theory 109 enterta
Page 126 and 127:
The satisfaction theory 111 manner.
Page 128 and 129:
The satisfaction theory 113 trigger
Page 130 and 131:
CHAPTER 4 Dynamic semantics The dif
Page 132 and 133:
Dynamic semantics 117 the existenti
Page 134 and 135:
Dynamic semantics 119 taken serious
Page 136 and 137:
Dynamic semantics 121 phenomena suc
Page 138 and 139:
Dynamic semantics 123 implementatio
Page 140 and 141:
Dynamic semantics 125 number of pos
Page 142 and 143:
Dynamic semantics 127 having to ass
Page 144 and 145:
Dynamic semantics 129 Here anaphora
Page 146 and 147:
Dynamic semantics 131 (19) a. Eithe
Page 148 and 149:
CHAPTERS 5 Attitude reports Althoug
Page 150 and 151:
Attitude reports 135 believe, but n
Page 152 and 153:
Attitude reports 137 Presupposition
Page 154 and 155:
Attitude reports 139 (11) Hob think
Page 156 and 157:
Attitude reports 141 have chosen to
Page 158 and 159:
Attitude reports 143 For the verb w
Page 160 and 161:
Attitude reports 145 he has a son,
Page 162 and 163:
Attitude reports 147 all obvious th
Page 164 and 165:
Attitude reports 149 common sense n
Page 166 and 167:
Attitude reports 151 (34) a. There
Page 168 and 169:
Attitude reports 153 (39) a. [x, y,
Page 170 and 171:
Attitude reports 155 c. c - [
Page 172 and 173:
Attitude reports 157 (46b) involves
Page 174 and 175:
Attitude reports 159 5.5 Presupposi
Page 176 and 177:
Attitude reports 161 I have said th
Page 178 and 179:
Attitude reports 163 The first pres
Page 180 and 181:
Attitude reports 165 This argument
Page 182 and 183:
Attitude reports 167 It may sometim
Page 184 and 185:
Attitude reports 169 there is a boy
Page 186 and 187:
Attitude reports 171 and asserts of
Page 188 and 189:
Attitude reports 173 (74) c. [p,p',
Page 190 and 191:
CHAPTER 6 Modals As it stands, the
Page 192 and 193:
Modals 177 111 can be dealt with by
Page 194 and 195: Modals 179 means that the material
Page 196 and 197: Modals 181 (13) a. Either it is in
Page 198 and 199: Modals 183 It is difficult to link
Page 200 and 201: Modals 185 Assuming just that modal
Page 202 and 203: Modals 187 g(q') S(q') = {(v,j) { E
Page 204 and 205: Modals 189 b. Nobody turned up at B
Page 206 and 207: Modals 191 q. Thus our theory impli
Page 208 and 209: Modals 193 The discourse in (39) is
Page 210 and 211: Modals 195 On the Kratzer/Lewis ana
Page 212 and 213: Modals 197 bound and is therefore a
Page 214 and 215: Modals 199 that the first sentence
Page 216 and 217: CHAPTER 7 Names What could be simpl
Page 218 and 219: Names 203 had scope but will also t
Page 220 and 221: Names 205 why use this word when a
Page 222 and 223: Names 207 Although it is always har
Page 224 and 225: Names 209 apparent difficulties, ca
Page 226 and 227: Names 211 have names; some of these
Page 228 and 229: Names 213 is (14c). Hence, on the p
Page 230 and 231: Names 215 that he himself might hav
Page 232 and 233: Names 217 alternative theories of m
Page 234 and 235: Names 219 Since John treats anaphor
Page 236 and 237: Names 221 NPs, and in doing so he b
Page 238 and 239: References Asher, N. 1986: Belief i
Page 240 and 241: References 225 Grice, H.P. 1975: Lo
Page 242 and 243: References 227 Levinson, S.c. S.C.
Page 246 and 247: Subject index accessibility: 38-39,
Page 248 and 249: Index of names Asher, N. xiii, 37,1
show all

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?