Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTERS<br />
5<br />
Attitude reports<br />
Although the literature on attitude reports is probably even larger than the<br />
presupposition literature, surprisingly little ink has been spilled on the<br />
interaction between presupposition inducers <strong>and</strong> attitude verbs. I don't have<br />
an explanation <strong>for</strong> this discrepancy, but it is certainly not as if the problems<br />
posed by presuppositions triggered in attitude contexts weren't challenging<br />
enough. For, as will be show in § 5.1, such presuppositions give rise to a<br />
number of perplexing puzzles. In § 5.2,1 I turn to Heim's (1992) theory, which<br />
is an attempt to solve some of these puzzles, <strong>and</strong> criticize her solution on<br />
several counts. In the remainder of this chapter I present my own proposal.<br />
To begin with, I define an extension of DRT in which attitude reports can be<br />
represented (§§ 5.3 <strong>and</strong> 5.4). I then argue that the verb believe triggers a<br />
certain presupposition <strong>and</strong> that this presupposition determines the<br />
projection behaviour of the verb (§ 5.5). This analysis yields predictions<br />
which are incomplete in the sense that they do not fully account <strong>for</strong> speakers'<br />
intuitions about presuppositions <strong>and</strong> anaphors in belief contexts. In § 5.6,1I<br />
suggest that this is as it should be because we may assume on independent<br />
grounds that there is a class of plausibility inferences which complement the<br />
predictions of the binding theory. In the final section, the analysis is extended<br />
to the verb want (§ 5.7).<br />
5.1 Presuppositional expressions in attitude contexts<br />
There are at least two reasons why presuppositions that are triggered within<br />
the scope of an attitude verb are more problematic than others. One is that<br />
attitude contexts are a notoriously difficult area in their own right. The other<br />
is that in attitude contexts the pre-theoretical notion of presupposition,<br />
which otherwise is quite secure, starts tottering. Consider a simple example:<br />
(1) Louise believes that her niece lives in Leeds.<br />
In (1) the definite description her niece occurs within the scope of the attitude<br />
verb believe. We would normally be entitled to infer from an utterance of this<br />
sentence that (the speaker believes that) Louise has a niece, <strong>and</strong> it may be<br />
PRESUPPOSITIONS AND PRONOUNS, Current Research in the <strong>Semantics</strong>/Pragmatics Interface, Vol. 3<br />
B. Geurts - © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved