01.02.2015 Views

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTERS<br />

5<br />

Attitude reports<br />

Although the literature on attitude reports is probably even larger than the<br />

presupposition literature, surprisingly little ink has been spilled on the<br />

interaction between presupposition inducers <strong>and</strong> attitude verbs. I don't have<br />

an explanation <strong>for</strong> this discrepancy, but it is certainly not as if the problems<br />

posed by presuppositions triggered in attitude contexts weren't challenging<br />

enough. For, as will be show in § 5.1, such presuppositions give rise to a<br />

number of perplexing puzzles. In § 5.2,1 I turn to Heim's (1992) theory, which<br />

is an attempt to solve some of these puzzles, <strong>and</strong> criticize her solution on<br />

several counts. In the remainder of this chapter I present my own proposal.<br />

To begin with, I define an extension of DRT in which attitude reports can be<br />

represented (§§ 5.3 <strong>and</strong> 5.4). I then argue that the verb believe triggers a<br />

certain presupposition <strong>and</strong> that this presupposition determines the<br />

projection behaviour of the verb (§ 5.5). This analysis yields predictions<br />

which are incomplete in the sense that they do not fully account <strong>for</strong> speakers'<br />

intuitions about presuppositions <strong>and</strong> anaphors in belief contexts. In § 5.6,1I<br />

suggest that this is as it should be because we may assume on independent<br />

grounds that there is a class of plausibility inferences which complement the<br />

predictions of the binding theory. In the final section, the analysis is extended<br />

to the verb want (§ 5.7).<br />

5.1 Presuppositional expressions in attitude contexts<br />

There are at least two reasons why presuppositions that are triggered within<br />

the scope of an attitude verb are more problematic than others. One is that<br />

attitude contexts are a notoriously difficult area in their own right. The other<br />

is that in attitude contexts the pre-theoretical notion of presupposition,<br />

which otherwise is quite secure, starts tottering. Consider a simple example:<br />

(1) Louise believes that her niece lives in Leeds.<br />

In (1) the definite description her niece occurs within the scope of the attitude<br />

verb believe. We would normally be entitled to infer from an utterance of this<br />

sentence that (the speaker believes that) Louise has a niece, <strong>and</strong> it may be<br />

PRESUPPOSITIONS AND PRONOUNS, Current Research in the <strong>Semantics</strong>/Pragmatics Interface, Vol. 3<br />

B. Geurts - © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!