01.02.2015 Views

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Presuppositions and Pronouns - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

190 <strong>Presuppositions</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pronouns</strong><br />

(cf. § 2.5), the binding theory predicts the contrast between these sentences.<br />

Roberts's theory, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, would allow the presupposition to be<br />

bound in both cases, <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e it doesn't account <strong>for</strong> the unacceptability<br />

of(35b).<br />

6.3 Constraints on modal subordination<br />

The semantics of the modal predicates '' <strong>and</strong> '0' 'n' as defined in (25) is<br />

essentially the classical one, but our account of modal subordination doesn't<br />

st<strong>and</strong> or fall with this interpretation. We have seen that the domain of a<br />

modal expression is determined by contextual factors, <strong>and</strong> have argued that<br />

this context dependence is of a presuppositional nature: modals presuppose<br />

their domains. Kratzer (1981, 1991) observes, however, that modals are<br />

context sensitive in a further respect. Namely, the interpretation of a modal<br />

may be dependent upon the internal structure of its domain. Kratzer offers<br />

several arguments why this should be so, but the easiest <strong>and</strong> probably most<br />

convincing way of appreciating this point is by noting that modality is very<br />

often a matter of degree: a proposition can be more or less likely, a course of<br />

action more or less desirable, <strong>and</strong> so on. A sentence of the <strong>for</strong>m 'It is likely<br />

that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!