26.02.2015 Views

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Diversity of Journalisms. Proceedings of <strong>ECREA</strong>/CICOM Conference, Pamplona, 4-5 July 2011<br />

Balance as a Source of Misinformation. A Study of <strong>the</strong><br />

Coverage of <strong>the</strong> Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change in <strong>the</strong><br />

Spanish Press<br />

Bienvenido León<br />

University of Navarra, Spain<br />

Abstract<br />

Among traditional journalistic norms, balance has played a key role, as it is often seen<br />

as a criterion that portrays <strong>the</strong> pursuits of objectivity. Balance reporting is seen by<br />

journalists as a tool to present <strong>the</strong> views of legitimate spokespersons of <strong>the</strong> conflicting<br />

sides in a dispute and provide both sides with equal attention.<br />

However, in <strong>the</strong> coverage of climate science, balance has also been regarded as a<br />

factor that can contribute to misinformation, by way of disguising bad journalistic<br />

practices, as it has enabled that <strong>the</strong> views of <strong>the</strong> so called ´climate change sceptics’<br />

have had a more relevant position in <strong>the</strong> media than within <strong>the</strong> scientific community.<br />

This paper analyzes <strong>the</strong> coverage of <strong>the</strong> International Conference on Climate Change,<br />

promoted by <strong>the</strong> United Nations (Copenhagen, December 2009), by <strong>the</strong> two leading<br />

Spanish newspapers (El País and El Mundo). Results indicate that <strong>the</strong> use of balance<br />

is subject to <strong>the</strong> editorial line of each newspaper. Although, scientific consensus is not<br />

directly disputed in information or editorial articles, balance can still be used as a tool to<br />

support <strong>the</strong> editorial line, thus becoming a possible source of misinformation. While one<br />

of <strong>the</strong> newspapers backs established scientific knowledge, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r one maintains an<br />

ambivalent position, by supporting <strong>the</strong> scientific consensus on <strong>the</strong> editorial articles, and<br />

presenting <strong>the</strong> sceptical point of view, especially in opinion articles.<br />

Introduction<br />

For over a century, balance has been an accepted and important journalistic norm, as<br />

one of <strong>the</strong> pillars of <strong>the</strong> notion of objectivity, which crystallized in American journalism<br />

in <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> 19 th century. Since <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> balance norm has been a<br />

relevant standard, although, in practice, not all journalists have implemented it<br />

uniformly and it has manifested in different ways (Antilla, 2005).<br />

Since objectivity implies to represent fairly each side of a controversy, balance<br />

reporting is considered to be an important tool to provide all points of view with equal<br />

attention (Michael, 2001, p. 150). Balance aims for neutrality, a notion opposed to that<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!