26.02.2015 Views

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Diversity of Journalisms. Proceedings of <strong>ECREA</strong>/CICOM Conference, Pamplona, 4-5 July 2011<br />

Investigative journalism and transparency. Three cases of study.<br />

Manfredi Sánchez, Juan Luis<br />

IE University, Segovia, Spain<br />

The good journalism is not a question related to <strong>the</strong> channel, i.e, people can find<br />

excellent stories in printed, audiovisual o digital media. The key question is <strong>the</strong><br />

definition of <strong>the</strong>se stories based on <strong>the</strong> public interest and <strong>the</strong> journalistic truth<br />

(Rosenstiel and Kovach, 1997). In order to do a good job, journalists need access to<br />

<strong>the</strong> main sources without <strong>the</strong> intervention of <strong>the</strong> intermediaries. Indeed, <strong>the</strong><br />

multiplication of public relations advisers, <strong>the</strong> rise of political marketing and events<br />

killed news stories and, consequently, <strong>the</strong> credibility of contemporary journalism. By<br />

definition, we know that power will not share information when it could jeopardize its<br />

integrity (e.g. Foucault or recently Manuel Castells). The power interest may be driven<br />

by political, economic or ano<strong>the</strong>r own concern (public opinion?).<br />

The challenge of investigative journalism is to break this monopoly of <strong>the</strong> main<br />

sources and to create again stories based on public interest. In recent years,<br />

technology has fostered <strong>the</strong> liberalization of data and public sources of information<br />

that allow <strong>the</strong> creation of such stories.<br />

The paper aims to analyze different cases of success, which has improved <strong>the</strong><br />

credibility of <strong>the</strong> media and <strong>the</strong>ir profitability. Top Secret Research America (The<br />

Washington Post), <strong>the</strong> ProPublica business model or <strong>the</strong> impact of Wikileaks on<br />

elpais.com are some examples of <strong>the</strong> new possibilities of investigative journalism.<br />

Media and journalists in Twitter: Corporatizing <strong>the</strong> personal and personalizing<br />

<strong>the</strong> professional<br />

López-Hermida Russo, Alberto; Claro Montes, Cecilia<br />

Facultad de Comunicación, Universidad de los Andes (Chile), Santiago, Chile<br />

Social Networks like Twitter have turned into platforms that people – as well as<br />

corporations – use to approach a universe of people that a decade ago, seemed<br />

unimaginable. Journalism has also been affected by this phenomena and journalists,<br />

as well as media corporations, make use of <strong>the</strong>se social networks.<br />

Media and journalists existence in platforms as Twitter inevitably generates a wide<br />

variety of ways to present <strong>the</strong>mselves to society. While media faces <strong>the</strong> challenge to<br />

upkeep <strong>the</strong>ir informational end, journalists have to find a balance between <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

personal and professional profile.<br />

A comparative usability analysis between media and journalists Twitter accounts<br />

makes this an evident problem that will allow studying <strong>the</strong> phenomena and proposing<br />

certain guidelines for action.<br />

Questions emerge rapidly: Can a media corporatize a social tool that is essentially<br />

personal? Must a journalist inform, give his/her opinion as a common citizen in an<br />

408

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!