26.02.2015 Views

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Diversity of Journalisms. Proceedings of <strong>ECREA</strong>/CICOM Conference, Pamplona, 4-5 July 2011<br />

Monday, July 4th 11.00 - 12.30 (Room 4)<br />

French war correspondence: An original model of journalism or a case of<br />

Americanization/globalization of norms and practices?<br />

Boudana, Sandrine<br />

New York University, New York City, USA<br />

Scholars, such as Rodney Benson, have defined French and American journalisms<br />

as opposite ideal-types. Since <strong>the</strong> 19th century, American journalism had advocated<br />

objectivity and empiricist focus on facts, while <strong>the</strong> French model had been rooted in a<br />

political and literary tradition. However, it seems, as Jean Chalaby argues, that <strong>the</strong><br />

American standards came to define professional journalism as early as <strong>the</strong> beginning<br />

of <strong>the</strong> 20th century, and that <strong>the</strong>re has been an Americanization of <strong>the</strong> French<br />

journalistic norms and practices. However <strong>the</strong> rejection of objectivity as a standard in<br />

<strong>the</strong> past decades might have, in turn, stopped this Americanization or led to <strong>the</strong><br />

definition of a globalized model.<br />

Focusing on war correspondence, this paper aims to evaluate to what extent French<br />

standards are still original, in what <strong>the</strong>y diverge from and in what <strong>the</strong>y converge with<br />

<strong>the</strong> American standards.<br />

The study is based on interviews with 25 French and American war correspondents<br />

and <strong>the</strong> analysis of newspaper articles covering violent foreign conflicts.<br />

The interviews show that French and American war correspondents identify <strong>the</strong> same<br />

fundamental values, accuracy and fairness. They also mention <strong>the</strong> same criteria for<br />

<strong>the</strong> definition of good journalistic practices, such as evidence-based statements or fair<br />

characterization of <strong>the</strong> protagonists in news reports. Although <strong>the</strong> importance granted<br />

to each of <strong>the</strong>se criteria might diverge, as well as <strong>the</strong> way of evaluating <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong><br />

findings indicate a convergence of American and French practices.<br />

However analysis of French newspaper articles covering foreign conflicts reveals a<br />

gap between what <strong>the</strong> interviewed journalists say that should be done and what<br />

journalists actually did. French war correspondents are essentially authors, whose<br />

personal presence is more marked than <strong>the</strong> American’s and who ultimately fulfil a<br />

bardic function.<br />

399

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!