26.02.2015 Views

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Diversity of Journalisms. Proceedings of <strong>ECREA</strong>/CICOM Conference, Pamplona, 4-5 July 2011<br />

Although El Mundo does not openly challenge <strong>the</strong> scientific consensus, through<br />

information or editorial articles, <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> balance norm allows providing an ample<br />

coverage of <strong>the</strong> sceptic point of view and <strong>the</strong> Climategate affair. In addition, several<br />

opinion articles (implicitly also justified by <strong>the</strong> norm of balance), include false or<br />

inaccurate facts, which constitute a potential source of misinformation on this topic.<br />

The use of this norm in <strong>the</strong> Spanish press, seems to be linked to <strong>the</strong> political position of<br />

<strong>the</strong> medium. The fact that only <strong>the</strong> conservative medium uses balance in this<br />

inappropriate way, allows drawing a relationship between <strong>the</strong> use of this norm and <strong>the</strong><br />

ideology of <strong>the</strong> medium. The analysis we have made in this study suggests that<br />

balance is used in a second level of decision, only when it can help to present ideas<br />

with are coherent with <strong>the</strong> editorial line of <strong>the</strong> medium.<br />

The norm of balance should be applied to give equal coverage to different points of<br />

view, on those topics which are subject of dissenting opinions. However, ours and<br />

previous studies show that <strong>the</strong>re also exists a perverted use of this norm, which leads<br />

to present false or inaccurate data on a topic in which scientific certainties leave little<br />

room for dissenting opinions. Therefore, journalists should use this norm with a sense<br />

of wisdom, combining <strong>the</strong>m with o<strong>the</strong>r journalistic norms, such as <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

contextualization, which allows giving each point of view <strong>the</strong> relative weight it really<br />

has.<br />

References<br />

Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of <strong>the</strong> science of<br />

climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338-352.<br />

Boykoff, M. T. (2008). Lost in translation? united states television news coverage of<br />

anthropogenic climate change, 1995-2004. Climatic Change, (1-2), 11.<br />

M.T. Boykoff and J.M. Boykoff (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: a case<br />

study of US mass-media coverage, Geoforum 38(6) (2007), 1190–1204.<br />

Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balances as bias: Global warming and <strong>the</strong> U.S.<br />

prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.<br />

Boykoff, M. T., & Mansfield, M. (2008). 'Ye olde hot aire'*: Reporting on human<br />

contributions to climate change in <strong>the</strong> UK tabloid press - art. no. 024002.<br />

Environmental Research Letters, 3(2), 24002.<br />

BoyKoff, M. T and Roberts, J. (2007). Climate change and human development – risk<br />

and vulnerability in a warming world: Media coverage of climate change – current<br />

trends, strengths and weaknesses, United Nations Development Program Human<br />

Development Reports.<br />

194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!