26.02.2015 Views

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Diversity of Journalisms. Proceedings of <strong>ECREA</strong>/CICOM Conference, Pamplona, 4-5 July 2011<br />

In order to study journalism on <strong>the</strong> micro-level, standards for research projects have<br />

evolved over <strong>the</strong> last decades (Weaver 1998).<br />

This contribution wants to discuss which aspects of change can be measured in <strong>the</strong><br />

traditional way, which aspects need o<strong>the</strong>r methods, and what kind of o<strong>the</strong>r methods<br />

would be suitable to measure change on <strong>the</strong> micro-level. The contribution is based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> author’s journalism research projects analyzing change in journalism in<br />

Switzerland. This was mainly done in two projects:<br />

a) A quantitative longitudinal journalism survey<br />

b) A qualitative research project aimed at describing how <strong>the</strong> internet has<br />

changed journalism<br />

Research has shown that traditional quantitative methods are still suitable to measure<br />

some aspects of journalism and change on a micro-level. These methods have <strong>the</strong><br />

advantage of yielding results which are comparable to similar surveys. Aspects that<br />

can be measured this way include socio-demographic data: education, political and<br />

cultural background, career patterns etc.<br />

However, some aspects can hardly be measured using quantitative surveys. This<br />

concerns questions like individual orientation or journalistic identity. Here new<br />

methodological approaches such as standardized journalists’ diaries or combinations<br />

of interviews with content analysis or observation to validate data ga<strong>the</strong>red in<br />

interviews are needed to understand change. However, <strong>the</strong>se approaches often do<br />

not allow comparisons across space and time. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> resulting studies<br />

often do not get <strong>the</strong> same attention like <strong>the</strong> seemingly hard facts from quantitative<br />

research, ignoring <strong>the</strong> question how valid <strong>the</strong> data from standardized surveys actually<br />

is, and how suitable it is to describe change.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> trade-off between comparability of data thanks to standardized quantitative<br />

methods, and more innovative methods, it is desirable that journalism research<br />

focuses more on relevance than scientific tradition in order to stay relevant itself in a<br />

fast changing world of journalism.<br />

The Diversity of Scholarship on Journalism: How journalism journals reflect<br />

<strong>the</strong>ories, methods, and topics of journalism research – a content analysis (2008<br />

– 2009)<br />

Löffelholz, Martin; Ro<strong>the</strong>nberger, Liane<br />

Ilmenau University of Technology, Ilmenau, Germany<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> course of time various changes in journalism created a diverse media<br />

landscape. Since generally journalism studies are closely linked to its object, this<br />

leads to <strong>the</strong> question whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> diversity of journalism is reflected by journalism<br />

studies.<br />

435

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!