26.02.2015 Views

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

Download the eBook (8.25 MB) - ECREA Thematic Sections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Diversity of Journalisms. Proceedings of <strong>ECREA</strong>/CICOM Conference, Pamplona, 4-5 July 2011<br />

explore <strong>the</strong> issue from <strong>the</strong> viewpoint of comments on news stories from <strong>the</strong> viewpoint<br />

of readers’ participation (Lampe, 2010; Tsagkias, 2010; Cho, 2010) 84 .<br />

Method<br />

The methodology of this research has consisted in an analysis of <strong>the</strong> legal norms and<br />

<strong>the</strong> moral norms of participation that are to be found in <strong>the</strong> web pages of five<br />

international digital newspapers: nytimes.com, guardian.con.uk, repubblica.it,<br />

lemonde.fr and elpais.com, which are <strong>the</strong> object of study. The analysis was carried out<br />

in November 2010, taking account of those norms concerning user participation that<br />

appear in <strong>the</strong> legal notices, although <strong>the</strong>y can also be found in o<strong>the</strong>r areas of <strong>the</strong><br />

websites. We have also considered <strong>the</strong> norms on <strong>the</strong> contractual regime that is<br />

established between <strong>the</strong> publishing company and <strong>the</strong> user, those relative to <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

<strong>the</strong> service, as well as those that refer to <strong>the</strong> rights that <strong>the</strong> users generate as authors.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, we have analysed <strong>the</strong> norms of behaviour that <strong>the</strong> user explicitly accepts<br />

when s/he accepts to send in comments. These norms delimit <strong>the</strong> framework of action<br />

of that new subject of communication.<br />

The analysis was made from <strong>the</strong> perspective of <strong>the</strong> discursive ethics of Jürgen<br />

Habermas (1992, 1997, 2003), because he deals with <strong>the</strong> moral requisites that can be<br />

demanded of <strong>the</strong> participation of speakers for <strong>the</strong>ir conversation to be compatible with<br />

democracy. Habermas considers that dialogue is an ethical and rational procedure for<br />

social construction. Thus, speakers must recognise each o<strong>the</strong>r as valid interlocutors<br />

through respectful treatment and consideration of <strong>the</strong> arguments of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. The<br />

rational and moral requisites that Habermas believes are demandable can be<br />

summarised in three broad sections:<br />

Logic and coherence<br />

The speakers should centre <strong>the</strong>ir intervention on <strong>the</strong> subject under debate, and show<br />

<strong>the</strong> intention of discussing it.<br />

84 O<strong>the</strong>r articles refer to <strong>the</strong> same question of comments on news stories, but from a technical point of<br />

view (Faradini, 2010).<br />

301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!