18.04.2015 Views

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SHRP 2 L11: Final Appendices<br />

Determining the Economic Benefits of Improving <strong>Travel</strong>-<strong>Time</strong> Reliability<br />

The purpose of this appendix is <strong>to</strong> present an approach for determining the economic benefits of<br />

improving travel-time reliability under recurring-event scenarios. In the approach, uncertainty<br />

arising from recurring events is converted <strong>to</strong> a certainty-equivalent measure in order <strong>to</strong> use<br />

conventional evaluation methods <strong>to</strong> place a value on the cost of unreliability. The certaintyequivalent<br />

measure is a method that allows us <strong>to</strong> express the value of reliability in terms of the<br />

increase in the average travel time a person would accept <strong>to</strong> eliminate uncertainty. For example,<br />

suppose that Mr. A is <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>to</strong> draw a card from a full deck. If he draws a red card he wins $100, and<br />

if he draws a black card he wins nothing. Based on the likelihood of winning or losing, if Mr. A<br />

could be paid $50 <strong>to</strong> not play the game, then $50 would be his certainty-equivalence. Thus, Mr. A<br />

has placed a dollar value on removing unreliability. Mr. A has foregone the chance at $100, but<br />

has also avoided the equal possibility of receiving no payment. Thus, a variable that can be<br />

characterized by its probability distribution can be converted <strong>to</strong> a certainty-equivalent measure.<br />

The approach presented for determining the value of reliability associated with recurring is<br />

extended <strong>to</strong> rare events in Appendix C. Recurring and rare events (and the unreliability produced<br />

by them) differ in the probability distributions that characterize them. Unreliability produced by<br />

recurring events is assumed <strong>to</strong> display statistical behavior that is best represented by normal<br />

distributions (often, a log-normal distribution). Rare or “extreme” events are better represented by<br />

a class of distributions known as extreme value (EV) distributions. It is often possible <strong>to</strong> observe<br />

the effect of recurring events on network performance directly by observing the variability in<br />

speeds or other network performance metrics. In the case of unreliability caused by rare events, it<br />

may not be possible <strong>to</strong> observe the statistical nature of the unreliability in real-world data, because<br />

the number of such incidents in a given region may be so low that coincident performance<br />

measurements are lacking. The rare event approach is briefly described in this appendix and is<br />

presented in full in Appendix C.<br />

Once the certainty-equivalent measure has been computed, valuation can proceed as if the values<br />

involved were deterministic. The value of reliability can be derived for multiple user groups or<br />

market segments by applying a separate value of time that corresponds <strong>to</strong> each user group along<br />

with the observed average volume for each user group on the roadway segment. The <strong>to</strong>tal value of<br />

reliability is then computed as the sum of the reliability values for each user group on the highway<br />

segment.<br />

To illustrate this concept, let us consider a single link of a roadway network that experiences<br />

considerable variation in the average travel time due <strong>to</strong> recurring congestion. Imagine a commuter<br />

would be willing <strong>to</strong> spend an additional minute per mile if the uncertainty in travel time were<br />

eliminated by a technical or policy action. This additional minute per mile is the certaintyequivalent<br />

of the unreliability caused by a recurring source of unreliability. The cost of<br />

unreliability <strong>to</strong> the commuter, converted <strong>to</strong> the certainty-equivalent measure, can be monetized by<br />

the value that he or she places on each minute of additional delay. Most studies report the value of<br />

time as being between 40 and 50 percent of the wage rate for average trips, and a much higher rate<br />

(around 85 percent of the wage rate) for commuting and intercity trips. The value of time for<br />

freight movement depends on the size of truck and value of the commodity hauled, typically with a<br />

value ranging between $30 and $60 per hour.<br />

Using the above mentioned certainty-equivalent value of 1 minute per mile and assuming that the<br />

average value of time of users of the roadway is $20 per hour (33.3 cents per minute), the roadway<br />

segment is 10 miles long, and it is used by 6000 users per hour during the time of day when<br />

DETERMINING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF IMPROVING TRAVEL-TIME RELIABILITY Page B-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!