18.04.2015 Views

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SHRP 2 L11: Final Appendices<br />

Agency Institutional Requirements<br />

In this appendix, specific institutional treatments are identified <strong>to</strong> improve travel time reliability<br />

based on the SHRP 2 L06 project findings. The key drivers that impact agencies’ development<br />

levels are different from the future alternative scenarios presented in Chapter 4. The agencies<br />

development (maturity) level is defined in terms of institutional organization and how their<br />

Systems <strong>Operations</strong> and Management (SO&M) activities are handled. Three development levels<br />

are identified as follows:<br />

• Development Level 1 – Ad Hoc: Systems <strong>Operations</strong> and Management (SO&M) activities<br />

are accommodated on an ad hoc and informal basis, usually as part of maintenance or<br />

capital project arrangements in response <strong>to</strong> congestion problems.<br />

• Development Level 2 – Rationalized: In this level, SO&M is considered a distinct activity<br />

with adjustments in arrangements, resources and roles <strong>to</strong> better manage each of the SO&M<br />

features.<br />

• Development Level 3 – Mainstreamed: In the highest level there has been real institutional<br />

change, and improving travel time reliability through SO&M has been adopted as a core<br />

mission, with appropriate formal and standardized agreements aiming <strong>to</strong> support<br />

continuous improvement of the implemented programs.<br />

Advancement up the ladder of these three development levels will be influenced by the following<br />

key institutional drivers:<br />

• Anticipated Major Traffic Impacts (e.g., Olympics, au<strong>to</strong> races)<br />

• Unanticipated Major Weather Events (e.g., snow s<strong>to</strong>rms, hurricanes, <strong>to</strong>rnados)<br />

• Financial Incentives (e.g., dedicated funds <strong>to</strong>wards ITS programs)<br />

• New Regional Political Configuration (e.g., MPOs, local governments)<br />

If agencies experiences one of these key drivers, they are likely <strong>to</strong> move <strong>to</strong> one or another of these<br />

levels. Events such as these can present a “window of opportunity” that can help move agencies<br />

<strong>to</strong>wards the development level 3 (which represents the ideal agency organization). The institutional<br />

treatments presented in this section should be viewed as applicable <strong>to</strong> all three alternative future<br />

scenarios and the level of implementation of each treatment is determined by the impact of each<br />

scenario on the institutional key drivers.<br />

In summary, agencies could aim <strong>to</strong> grow from development level 1 <strong>to</strong> development level 3 in all<br />

three future scenarios. The treatments <strong>to</strong> be implemented are the same, but the circumstances and<br />

the intensity of each institutional key driver are different. The recommended strategies for<br />

Objective 1 – <strong>Improve</strong> agency management, organization, and resource allocation for all three<br />

future scenarios are shown in Table E.1.<br />

STRATEGY FRAMEWORK FOR AGENCY MANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATION, AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION Page E-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!