18.04.2015 Views

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SHRP 2 L11: Final Appendices<br />

able <strong>to</strong> provide. For example, the government in Germany has a goal <strong>to</strong> ensure that 80% of all<br />

journeys have adequate, standardized real-time traffic and traveler information services by 2010<br />

(8, 17 and 18).<br />

Signal Retiming/Optimization. Traffic-signal-timing optimization and coordination minimizes<br />

vehicle s<strong>to</strong>ps, delay, and/or queues at individual and multiple signalized intersections by<br />

implementing or modifying signal timing parameters (i.e., phase splits, cycle length and offset),<br />

phasing sequences, and control strategies. Effective signal retiming can increase capacity and<br />

reduce signal delay, leading <strong>to</strong> lower travel times, improved reliability and reduced driver<br />

frustration. For optimal performance, traffic-signal-timing plans need <strong>to</strong> be updated at least every<br />

three <strong>to</strong> five years, and possibly more frequently depending on growth and changes in traffic<br />

patterns. The cost of retiming a signal is approximately $3,000. If 25% of the approximately<br />

265,000 signals in the United States are retimed every year, the annual cost would be roughly $200<br />

million. Lack of resources (staff and funding) is the most-often-cited constraint for updating signal<br />

timing plans (6, 14).<br />

For example, the Traffic Light Synchronization Program in 43 cities in Texas reduced delay by<br />

24.6% and lowered travel time by 14%. In Burling<strong>to</strong>n, Canada, signal retiming at 62 intersections<br />

lowered travel time by 7% (9). The National Traffic Signal Operation Self Assessment program<br />

sponsored by the National Transportation <strong>Operations</strong> Coalition (NTOC) in partnership with the<br />

Federal Highway Administration is a national effort <strong>to</strong> bring awareness <strong>to</strong> the need for additional<br />

investment in traffic signal operations. Since 2005, a National Traffic Signal Report Card has been<br />

published every two years that summarizes the results of self-assessments conducted by cities<br />

nationwide. The document evaluates how signal retiming/optimization are being conducted by the<br />

survey participants and points out outstanding needs <strong>to</strong> improve traffic signal operations (19).<br />

Traffic Signal Preemption at Highway-Railroad Grade Crossings (HRGC). The railroad<br />

traffic control system is required <strong>to</strong> provide a minimum warning time of 20 seconds <strong>to</strong> the<br />

signalized intersection control system and such time is not always adequate <strong>to</strong> safely clear s<strong>to</strong>pped<br />

vehicles from the HRGC area. From a traffic engineer’s perspective, the current traffic signal<br />

preemption strategies are viewed as a reactive action <strong>to</strong> trains approaching a nearby HRGC as the<br />

20 seconds is less than a typical cycle length of 90 <strong>to</strong> 120 seconds. Instead, if notifications of<br />

expected train arrivals at an HRGC could be accurately provided up <strong>to</strong> a cycle length before the<br />

train arrival at the HRGC <strong>to</strong> the signalized intersection control system, safer and more proactive<br />

preemption strategies could be adopted <strong>to</strong> provide improved safety and highway traffic operations<br />

in the HRGC area (11).<br />

Research on the application of low-cost ITS technologies <strong>to</strong> coordinate and optimize traffic signal<br />

timing with train arrivals at grade crossings has been supported by the Federal Railroad<br />

Administration (FRA) for the past several years. Several publications and test beds have been<br />

successfully implemented by universities and DOTs. Most recently, Positive Train Control (PTC)<br />

systems have been identified as the leading edge <strong>to</strong> the future of railroad and highway operations.<br />

Positive train control systems are defined as “integrated command, control, communications, and<br />

information systems for controlling train movements with safety, security, precision, and<br />

efficiency” (11) as focus. PTC systems will reduce delays at HRGC by providing advance notice<br />

of train arrival and traffic signal preemption optimization. PTC systems are currently tested by the<br />

major Class I railroads in the U.S.<br />

Traffic Adaptive Signal Control/Advanced Signal Systems. Responsive traffic operation<br />

systems select a prepared timing plan based on the observed/measured level of traffic in the<br />

system. Adaptive traffic signal control involves advanced detection of traffic, downstream signal<br />

ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION AND QUANTITATIVE BENEFITS OF TRAVEL-TIME RELIABILITY STRATEGIES Page F-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!