11.07.2015 Views

Bihar - Jamia Millia Islamia _Final format_.pdf

Bihar - Jamia Millia Islamia _Final format_.pdf

Bihar - Jamia Millia Islamia _Final format_.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(xli)(xlii)In respect of the schools visited by MI, the numberof teachers sanctioned for the schools, the numberof teachers in position, the number of teacherspresent in the school on the day of visit, the namesof the teachers absent on the day of visit. Whetherany teacher is a habitual absentee?122In<strong>format</strong>ion to be obtained from the school andfrom the VEC. The list of the names of teachersabsent and those who are habitually absent mustbe given in the report.Among 101 sampled school, number of sanctioned post was 501, out of which 443 (88.4%)teachers were in position and 415 (93.6%) were present on the day of visit. The names ofthe teachers absent on the day of visit are given in annexure ( ).How was the rapport between children and theteachers in the schools visited?To be ascertained from the VEC and observedduring the visit by MI.In all the sample schools there was a good rapport between children and the teacher.(xliii)(xliv)The target number of teachers district-wise to begiven in service training and the actual number ofteachers given such training in State/districtvisited? Is there a training calendar for teacherstraining? What was the venue; the content andmodule for training, who prepared it? Who werethe trainers? Who trained them? What was thesupervision/monitoring system to check quality ofthese trainings? Is there a regular system of gettingfeedback from teachers?To be ascertained from the SPO and updatedfrom the DPO in respect of the districts visitedby the MI and to be verified from the teachers inschools visited by MI.The target of in-service training for 2008 – 09 was 7344 teachers and actually trained wereno teacher was given training as per SPO record. As per DPO record a target of training for3334 teachers was taken and 1363 were actually trained. Training calendar was available inthe blocks of Akbarpur, Govindpur, Meskaur, Nawada and Roh at BRC. For 30/51 daystraining venue was BRC and 10 days training under Ujala module was mostly carried atCRC. Training module is prepared by DPO. RP at BRC and CRC were the main trainers.Quality of training is checked by BRCC and occasionally by DPC. MI representative wastold that RP of both BRC and CRC visit schools to get feedback from the recently trainedteachers.The target number of newly recruited teachersdistrict-wise, to be given orientation training of 30days and the actual number of teachers given suchtraining, and venue of the training, for how manydays and who were the Master Trainers? What wasthe monitoring done for ensuring quality of thetraining?To be ascertained from the SPO and updatedfrom the DPO in respect of the districts visitedby the MI and to be verified from the teachers inschools visited by MI.2847 teachers were targeted for orientation training of 30/51 days among the newlyrecruited teachers. Out of which no teacher was given training. DPO has taken a target of2446 teachers and as per DPO record 1687 were provided training. Training calendar wasavailable in the blocks of Aurangabad, Goh, Rafigan and Navinagar at BRC. For 30/51 daystraining venue was BRC and 10 days training under Ujala module was mostly carried atCRC. Training module is prepared by DPO. RP at BRC and CRC were the main trainers.Quality of training is checked by BRCC and occasionally by DPC. Among sampled schoolsout of 381 Panchayat teachers 65 have received orientation training of 51 days.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!