Bihar - Jamia Millia Islamia _Final format_.pdf

(lvi)(lvii)(lviii)(lix)28.3% of the sampled school in Rohtas have reported that the VSS members have beentrained by technical persons for execution of civil work.Whether community manual for civil works has beenprepared and is available with VEC/SMC?148To be verified on the spot with assistance ofVEC/SMC and School Teachers (sample as in(ii) above).23.6% schools have reported that they have prepared community manual for civil works andit is available with VSS membersIs the school buildings being constructed (newschools as well as building less schools), whether aramp is being constructed?In 28 (26.4%) sampled schools ramp has been constructed.Is VEC/SMC keeping a separate account of fundsand materials for construction?To be verified on the spot with assistance ofVEC/SMC and School Teachers (sample as in(ii) above).By physical verification by the MI in respect ofconstruction sites visited (sample as in (ii)above).M I has found that in 18 schools (17.0%) a separate account of funds and material forconstruction is maintained while in 88 schools (83%) separate account of funds forconstruction is not maintained.Who is designated for Technical Supervision for civilworks? What level (Block/District/Sub-District)?To be obtained from the SPO/DPO and thenverified on the field with VEC/SMC and SchoolTeachers (sample as in (ii) above).In 10 schools (9.4%) Assistant Engineer is the technical supervisor who are working atdistrict level while in 26 schools (24.5%) Junior Engineer is designated for technicalsupervision of civil work who are working at block level.(lx)(lxi)(lxii)(lxiii)The number of times the technical person visited theconstruction site and guided the constructionprocess? Did he visit at the foundation stage, linteland roof stage?To be verified on the spot with assistance ofVEC/SMC and School Teachers (sample as in(ii) above).Visit at foundation level: it was only once in 7 schools (6.7%), twice in 4 schools (3.8%),thrice in 5 (4.8%) schools, 4 times in 4 schools (3.8%) and five times in 5 (4.9%) schools..Visit at lintel level was only once in 8 (7.5%) schools, twice in 6 (5.7%) schools, thrice in 2(1.9%) schools, 4 times in 2 schools (1.9%) and five times in 4 school (3.8%).Visit at roofing stage was only once in 13 schools (12.4%), twice in 1 schools (1.0%), 4times in 3 schools (2.9%) and 5 times in 5 (4.8%) schools.Visit at completion stage was only once in 8 schools (7.5%), twice in 1 schools (0.9%),thrice in 1 (.09%) schools and five times and more 6 (5.6%).If there any convergence with Swajaldhara and TotalSanitation Campaign (TSC) taking place in respectof drinking water facilities provided in the schoolsvisited by MI? The quantum of funds utilised fromSwajaldhara and TSC and SSA in the sites visited?Status to be obtained from SPO updated at DPOin districts visited by MI. To be verified on thespot with assistance of VEC/SMC and SchoolTeachers (sample as in (ii) above).Only 5 schools (4.7%) there is a convergence with Swajaldhara and Total SanitationCampaign (TSC) taking place in respect of drinking water facilities provided in the schools.Whether construction of drinking water facilities inschools is being carried out by a specialized Agencyor VEC/SMC?To be verified on the spot with assistance ofVEC/SMC and School Teachers (sample as in(ii) above).62 schools (58.5%) have reported that VSS is constructing drinking water facilities inschools, in 9 schools (8.5%) other agency is constructing while in 1 school (.09%) specialagency has taken the responsibility of providing drinking water facilities.Is there any convergence with Total SanitationCampaign (TSC) taking place in respect of toiletfacilities in the schools? The quantum of fundsavailable from TSC and SSA in the sites visited?Status to be obtained from SPO updated at DPOin districts visited by MI. To be verified on thespot with assistance of VEC/SMC and SchoolTeachers (sample as in (ii) above).