Bihar - Jamia Millia Islamia _Final format_.pdf

(v)(vi)In respect of the schools visited by MI, the numberof teachers sanctioned for the schools, the numberof teachers in position, the number of teacherspresent in the school on the day of visit, the namesof the teachers absent on the day of visit. Whetherany teacher is a habitual absentee?23Information to be obtained from the school andfrom the VEC. The list of the names of teachersabsent and those who are habitually absent mustbe given in the report.Among 112 sampled school, number of sanctioned post was 654, out of which 550 (84.1%)teachers were in position and 482 (87.6%) were present on the day of visit. The names ofthe teachers absent on the day of visit are given in annexure ( ). Among the absentees mostwere either deputed in electoral duty or in preparing BPL lists.Name of habitual absentees are given below.Name of habitualabsenteeSl.No District name Block name School name1 AURANGAB GOH PS AJAN MANORMA2 AURANGAB GOH MS HATHI MUKHTAR3 AURANGAB GOH MS WALAD RITA KUMARI4 AURANGAB GOH MS WALAD DEVDIP YADAV5 AURANGAB GOH MS WALAD RAJIV KUMARHow was the rapport between children and theteachers in the schools visited?To be ascertained from the VEC and observedduring the visit by MI.In all the sample schools there was a good rapport between children and the teacher.(vii)(viii)The target number of teachers district-wise to begiven in service training and the actual number ofteachers given such training in State/districtvisited? Is there a training calendar for teacherstraining? What was the venue; the content andmodule for training, who prepared it? Who werethe trainers? Who trained them? What was thesupervision/monitoring system to check quality ofthese trainings? Is there a regular system of gettingfeedback from teachers?To be ascertained from the SPO and updatedfrom the DPO in respect of the districts visitedby the MI and to be verified from the teachers inschools visited by MI.The target of in-service training for 2008 – 09 was 10614 teachers and actually trained were240 as per SPO record. DPO has taken a target of 4860 teachers and as per DPO record allhave been provided training. Training calendar was available in the blocks of Aurangabad,Goh, Rafigan and Navinagar at BRC. For 30/51 days training venue was BRC and 10 daystraining under Ujala module was mostly carried at CRC. Training module is prepared byDPO. RP at BRC and CRC were the main trainers. Quality of training is checked by BRCCand occasionally by DPC. MI representative was told that RP of both BRC and CRC visitschools to get feedback from the recently trained teachers.The target number of newly recruited teachersdistrict-wise, to be given orientation training of 30days and the actual number of teachers given suchtraining, and venue of the training, for how manydays and who were the Master Trainers? What wasthe monitoring done for ensuring quality of thetraining?To be ascertained from the SPO and updatedfrom the DPO in respect of the districts visitedby the MI and to be verified from the teachers inschools visited by MI.1297 teachers were targeted for orientation training of 30 days among the newly recruitedteachers out of which 273 were actually trained. DPO has taken a target of 4860 teachersand as per DPO record all have been provided training. Training calendar was available inthe blocks of Aurangabad, Goh, Rafigan and Navinagar at BRC. For 30/51 days trainingvenue was BRC and 10 days training under Ujala module was mostly carried at CRC.Training module is prepared by DPO. RP at BRC and CRC were the main trainers. Qualityof training is checked by BRCC and occasionally by DPC. Among sampled schools out of381 Panchayat teachers 65 have received orientation training of 51 days.