13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Preceramic Period 89Figure 3.21.Overview <strong>of</strong> Sheep Camp Shelter, excavated by <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Kansas as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Chaco</strong> Shelters Project. (<strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Culture</strong> NHP Museum Archive, Photo no. 30775. WilliamB. Gillespie, photographer.)1,975 m [6,475 ft]), <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast side <strong>of</strong> ashallow open side canyon (Figure 3.21). Excavationsin a test pit <strong>and</strong> four areas <strong>of</strong> this 20 m long <strong>and</strong> 7 to8 m deep shelter covered approximately 26 m 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>surface area. Two major strata were defined. Instratum A, <strong>the</strong> upper 15 to 65 cm were composed <strong>of</strong>dense organic material (mostly plants collected bypack rats) in decomposing s<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>and</strong> are assigneddates from approximately 3,000 years ago to <strong>the</strong>present. The lower stratum (stratum B) reflects LatePleistocene or Early Holocene fauna; thick s<strong>and</strong>stonerubble has few archaeological or macrobotanicalremains but abundant faunal remains. Becausematerial <strong>of</strong>ten slumped <strong>of</strong>f from higher levels, <strong>the</strong> twostrata were <strong>of</strong>ten difficult to separate. The evidencefor Archaic period use is in <strong>the</strong> uppermost levels <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> lower stratum (B) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper stratum (A).These deposits also have remains that indicate use <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> rockshelter until approximately A.D. 900.Hearths (but not firepits) indicate non-intensive use <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> shelter.Several radiocarbon dates were obtained(Simmons 1984b:Table 50). Two from domesticsquash seeds-2820 ± 220 B.P. (A-3388) <strong>and</strong> 2130 ±280 (A-3159)-indicate early evidence (approximately870 B.C.) <strong>of</strong> use. Two maize kernels were also datedto 2250±80 B.P. (A-3395) <strong>and</strong> 2150±170 B.P. (A-3396) (Gillespie 1984a:69, Table 8), or approximately500 to 200 B. C. The major contribution <strong>of</strong> this excavationwas pack rat midden <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r faunal remainsthat provided new data for reconstruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>paleoenvironment.Survey around Sheep Camp Shelter documented26 sites; <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se, eight were classified as lithicscatters with presumed Archaic affiliation. Six arelocated on level areas along <strong>the</strong> ridge tops aboveSheep Camp Shelter, <strong>and</strong> two were on <strong>the</strong> sloping area(talus ?) between <strong>the</strong> upper <strong>and</strong> lower cliffs. Of <strong>the</strong>se,four were in s<strong>and</strong> dunes; <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs are in s<strong>and</strong> sheets.Located at several were concentrations <strong>of</strong> burned rock.No diagnostic lithics were found <strong>and</strong> no finer chronologicalplacement <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se sites was made (Weston <strong>and</strong>Simmons 1984: 121-122). Ten possible Archaic sitesalong Sheep Camp <strong>Canyon</strong> were identified duringbrief reconnaissance. A test at Sheep Camp no. 4uncovered a fire-burned rock concentration that provideda radiocarbon date <strong>of</strong> ca. 160 B. C. (Weston <strong>and</strong>Simmons 1984:Table 26).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!