13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118 <strong>Chaco</strong> Project Syn<strong>the</strong>sislower bench <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great kiva at 29SJ423 suggests <strong>the</strong>beginning <strong>of</strong> a custom <strong>of</strong> placing <strong>the</strong>se materials inbuildings ei<strong>the</strong>r during construction or remodeling(Mathien 2001b).The technology for jewelry-making <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> use<strong>of</strong> turquoise <strong>and</strong> shell were documented in nor<strong>the</strong>asternArizona during Basketmaker II. In <strong>the</strong> early<strong>Chaco</strong>an sites <strong>the</strong>re is little evidence for <strong>the</strong> manufacturing<strong>of</strong> jewelry items. No workshops have beenfound; items that were used were probably being madeon an as-needed basis (Mathien 1984). Tools used tomake jewelry include active <strong>and</strong> passive lapidaryabraders. These tools are rarely found in BasketmakerIII or Pueblo I sites (Akins 1997:733, 773, 792,Tables 5.25, 5.81, 5.89). None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> abraders attributedto <strong>the</strong> Basketmaker III through Pueblo Iperiods suggested a jewelry workshop area.Those abraders that are present are part <strong>of</strong> a toolkit that includes polishers <strong>and</strong> cobbles. Most abraderswere made <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>stone; quartzite cobbles also wereused in high numbers (Akins 1997:Table 5.153).During <strong>the</strong> Basketmaker III <strong>and</strong> Pueblo I periods,<strong>the</strong>re were low percentages <strong>of</strong> active <strong>and</strong> passiveabraders; high percentages <strong>of</strong> polishers; high percentages<strong>of</strong> burned abraders (except at 29SJ423); muchvariability in cobble materials; less reuse <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rartifacts as abraders than in later times; fewer abradersthat were extensively modified; <strong>and</strong> more abraders thatwere more <strong>of</strong>ten heavily used than in later sites, <strong>and</strong>secondary use, mostly as hammerstones (Akins 1997:853). Akins reasoned that ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> polishers wereused for many activities that abraders later filled, orthat <strong>the</strong>y were perhaps used for maintaining claysurfaces that are found in pit structures <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rsubterranean structures until Pueblo II. During thisperiod, <strong>the</strong> tool kit was more general than that <strong>of</strong> laterperiods. The incorporation <strong>of</strong> abraders into benchconstruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great kiva at 29SJ423 indicates thatlarger stones, even during Basketmaker III, werereused during construction.At two Pueblo I sites, 29SJ721 <strong>and</strong> 29SJ724,anvils were found on floors from which almosteverything else <strong>of</strong> value had been removed. The onefrom 29S1724 was recovered in an area near twometate fragments <strong>and</strong> five bone tinklers <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r boneartifacts. Akins (1997:927) considered this anvil to bepart <strong>of</strong> a bone tool working area or possibly aresonating chamber.Analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se different artifacts indicate that<strong>the</strong> Basketmaker III <strong>and</strong> Pueblo I people in <strong>Chaco</strong>ei<strong>the</strong>r traveled long distances, traded with neighboringtribes, or were joined by people from <strong>the</strong>se areas whobrought some local resources with <strong>the</strong>m. The direction<strong>of</strong> social interaction during <strong>the</strong> Basketmaker IIIperiod indicates that <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> ceramics <strong>and</strong> lithicsfrom eastern Arizona <strong>and</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn New Mexico wasmore intense during this period <strong>and</strong> that contact with<strong>the</strong> north <strong>and</strong> east increased during Pueblo 1.Because human remains from all excavated sitesin <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> attributed to this period are meager,Akins (1986) analyzed all from <strong>the</strong> Basketmakerperiod through <strong>the</strong> early Red Mesa (pre-A.D. 925)period as one group. The largest number (n= 14) wasrecovered from Shabik'eshchee Village, where onlythree were accompanied by ceramics, <strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong>Three C site (n= 15), where six had Early Red Mesapottery. When found, <strong>the</strong>se grave goods were recoveredwith burials <strong>of</strong> children as well as adults. Ingeneral, a westerly orientation was reported (Akins1986:82-85). Although <strong>the</strong> sample is small <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>data from <strong>the</strong>se previous excavations limited, it doesprovide a baseline with which to contrast later humanburials <strong>and</strong> grave goods to infer changes in socialorganization.Contributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> ProjectInvestigations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Basketmaker III-Pueblo Iperiod indicates considerable change during <strong>the</strong> 400years. Families lived in small houses. Initially <strong>the</strong>rewere two major clusters on mesa tops; several o<strong>the</strong>rsmaller ones were also identified. The two m~orclusters contained large, round structures suggestive <strong>of</strong>great kivas at different ends <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon. Althoughmany smaller sites were also located on mesas (relativelyclose to tributaries <strong>of</strong> main streams), o<strong>the</strong>rswere found on <strong>the</strong> floodplains, some at a considerabledepth below <strong>the</strong> current surface. There was amovement <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> mesas during Pueblo I, <strong>and</strong> Hayes(1981) noted a shift in site cluster locations. RecentlyWindes (2001) identified a Pueblo I village with agreat kiva on <strong>the</strong> south fork <strong>of</strong> Fajada Wash. Duringthis period, antechambers were transformed intoventilator shafts, <strong>and</strong> living quarters were moved frompit structures to above-ground rooms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!