13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Final Years 241severe drought from approximately A.D. 1130through 1180. The canyon area was consideredmostly depopulated during this period.The Mesa Verde Phase. This phase is datedbetween A.D. 1200 <strong>and</strong> 1300. Mesa Verde Black-onwhite<strong>and</strong> indented corrugated (with rock <strong>and</strong> sherdtemper) characterize <strong>the</strong> period. Repopulation occurs;<strong>and</strong> Aztec East, a large <strong>Chaco</strong>an site on <strong>the</strong> AnimasRiver, is constructed.In summary, at <strong>the</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong>Project, researchers had better chronological control<strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> carbon-painted ceramic series in <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>.The blending <strong>of</strong> traits visible in <strong>Chaco</strong> McElmo Blackon-white<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> recognition that it was made inseveral subregions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> suggest aneed to discern whe<strong>the</strong>r this represents a mixing <strong>of</strong>people, ideas, or both, beginning around A.D. 1080.The evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carbon-painted ceramic seriesindicates that this was a gradual transition <strong>and</strong> notmajor migration into <strong>the</strong> canyon from <strong>the</strong> north.Due to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> ceramic evidence on <strong>the</strong>surface <strong>of</strong> some small sites that were reused in latertimes, <strong>the</strong>re are still problems with <strong>the</strong> identification<strong>of</strong> Mesa Verde phase sites <strong>and</strong> settlement patterns,both in <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> <strong>and</strong> throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong><strong>Basin</strong>. What is needed is a detailed reassessment <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> sites <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir locations; <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong>y represented single components or <strong>the</strong> reuse <strong>of</strong>previously inhabited areas, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> settlementpatterns (especially <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> communities).Based on his sample resurvey data, Windes(1987[1]:404) was able to correlate <strong>the</strong> decreasedpopUlations or possible ab<strong>and</strong>onment between A.D.1130 <strong>and</strong> 1180, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> final departure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pueblopeople from <strong>the</strong> canyon in <strong>the</strong> late A.D. 1200s withtwo unusually long drought periods that Bums (1983)indicated would be disastrous for com production.Because so little time was devoted to this period, <strong>the</strong>social implications for <strong>the</strong> inhabitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger region were not pursued.DiscussionA reaction to <strong>the</strong> stress <strong>of</strong> major droughts (A.D.1130 to 1180, <strong>and</strong> A.D. 1276 to 1299) may have been<strong>the</strong> ab<strong>and</strong>onment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> <strong>and</strong> FourComers area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Anasazi region. Yet someevidence for cultural continuity exists. Evidence for<strong>the</strong> Mesa Verde phase in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> includessites located in <strong>the</strong> bottoml<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>, aswell as in <strong>the</strong> Chacra Mesa upl<strong>and</strong>s, near PuebloPintado (Pintado Gap, <strong>and</strong> east <strong>of</strong> Pintado Gap). Sitesare also documented as far south as Las Ventanas <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> Rio Puerco. Known communities include <strong>the</strong><strong>Chaco</strong> East community (Windes et al. 2000); MesaTierra (Marshall et al. 1979; Mathien 2002); <strong>the</strong> CM100 area, <strong>and</strong> one settlement to <strong>the</strong> north (Jacobson<strong>and</strong> Roney 1985); Pueblo Pintado; <strong>and</strong> possibly RatonSprings (Marshall et al. 1979; Wait 1983:181-184).No communities are documented for central <strong>Chaco</strong><strong>Canyon</strong>; but firepits in some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper levels <strong>of</strong>filled rooms in great houses suggest that some activitytook place at least a few times in <strong>the</strong>se sites. Theywere not, however, <strong>the</strong> centers <strong>of</strong> activity <strong>the</strong>y hadbeen in earlier years.Based on a review <strong>of</strong> data on known Mesa Verdephase site locations from <strong>the</strong> inventory survey <strong>of</strong><strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>, <strong>the</strong> additional l<strong>and</strong>s survey, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>Chacra Mesa sites documented by Jacobson <strong>and</strong> Roney(1985) (which included Gwinn Vivian's data from <strong>the</strong>late 1950s), McKenna (1991) commented on <strong>the</strong> diversity<strong>of</strong> site types that were utilized during this lateoccupation. Some were classified as expedient constructions;among <strong>the</strong>se were small talus-bouldershelters <strong>and</strong> granaries, open adobe rooms, masonrypueblitos on butte tops, jacal buildings <strong>and</strong> augmentingmasonry rooms, <strong>and</strong> small boulder-backedpueblos. There was a reuse <strong>of</strong> existing buildings(e.g., at 29JS633, Be 236, Be 52, Leyit Kin, <strong>and</strong> Be51), as well as construction <strong>of</strong> new units (HeadquartersB, Unit III at Leyit Kin, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> Kiva6 at Be 51). Some commonalities among sites includesmall, single-story, accretional construction <strong>and</strong> ablocked-in keyhole-style plastered kiva. Rooms hadsmall firepits located near <strong>the</strong> walls, paired slabmetates in bins, <strong>and</strong> subfloor burials. None <strong>of</strong> thisdata reflect <strong>the</strong> high labor input that was seen during<strong>the</strong> Classic period.McKenna (1991) suggested that Mesa Verdeceramics included subregional types, but representeda broad regional continuum. If so, what was happeningthroughout <strong>the</strong> region? When Stein <strong>and</strong>McKenna (1988) conducted reconnaissance survey <strong>of</strong>great houses <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r small sites in <strong>the</strong> Animas

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!