13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

242 <strong>Chaco</strong> Project Syn<strong>the</strong>sisValley, a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mesa Verde greathouses extended along <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> River from Blancoto Shiprock, as well as on <strong>the</strong> Animas <strong>and</strong> La Platarivers (Stein <strong>and</strong> McKenna 1988:Figure 13). Most <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se sites are attributed to <strong>the</strong> late eleventh <strong>and</strong>twelfth centuries. They found a large communityaround Aztec Ruins National Monument, <strong>and</strong> perhapsa similar large community at <strong>the</strong> Kello Blancett site to<strong>the</strong> southwest.Like Gwinn Vivian (1990), McKenna (1991)thought that changes in subsistence (i.e., more relianceon small mammals <strong>and</strong> turkeys <strong>and</strong> a shift from flintto flour com) were taking place; he <strong>the</strong>refore concludedthat <strong>the</strong>re were definite alterations in <strong>the</strong>subsistence strategies that had earlier beginnings. By<strong>the</strong> Mesa Verde phase, <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> could haverepresented an alternative to <strong>the</strong> more denselypopulated riverine communities along <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong>; itcould have been an alternative planting area for asmall population. McKenna considered <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong>as <strong>the</strong> regional center, with <strong>Chaco</strong> as a location withreduced population <strong>and</strong> an altered communitystructure. He could not determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> MesaVerde phase in <strong>the</strong> canyon represented reorganizationor increased use by additional groups, or a combination<strong>of</strong> both. For McKenna, <strong>the</strong> Mesa Verdephase was not representative <strong>of</strong> a migration <strong>of</strong> peopleinto <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> area. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> Mesa Verde potterythat has been found was part <strong>of</strong> an ongoing development<strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a regionally distinct black-on-whitehorizon style. A major problem still exists because <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> dates for excavated sites <strong>and</strong> lack <strong>of</strong>association <strong>of</strong> Mesa Verde Black-on-white withconstruction.Stein <strong>and</strong> Fowler (1996) supported <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong>continued use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> until finalab<strong>and</strong>onment in <strong>the</strong> middle A.D. BOOs. Theyproposed that <strong>the</strong> great house complexes (with greatkivas <strong>and</strong> roads) do not represent normal living spacesfor people who had been organized in communitiesfrom <strong>the</strong> seventh through fourteenth centuries.Instead, <strong>the</strong>y represent integrative architecture forei<strong>the</strong>r a community or a region. In this scenario, <strong>the</strong>architectural manifestations have specific functionalroles in <strong>the</strong> local community. The complex in <strong>Chaco</strong><strong>Canyon</strong> would represent a set <strong>of</strong> regional integrativearchitecture that during <strong>the</strong> early A.D. 1100s clearlyshifted away from <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> <strong>and</strong> ended up soon<strong>the</strong>reafter in <strong>the</strong> Totah region, north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong>River. Using data from several subareas, <strong>the</strong>yindicated <strong>the</strong> continued presence <strong>of</strong> big houses orcompounds throughout <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>and</strong> cited severalinstances in which newly constructed big houses aretied to older compounds by road segments. They didnot see a displaced <strong>Chaco</strong>an population, but ra<strong>the</strong>r aplanned renewal <strong>of</strong> "ritual" facilities. This renewalwas undertaken at a community <strong>and</strong> a regional scale.While older elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> culture were important,new architectural styles (beginning with <strong>the</strong> McElmostyle <strong>of</strong> construction by A.D. 1100 to 1140) denote<strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> this shift. The continuity thatMcKenna argued for black-on-white ceramic types(with Mesa Verde Black-on-white being <strong>the</strong> last <strong>of</strong> thisseries) is also apparent in <strong>the</strong> architecture throughout<strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> <strong>and</strong> its periphery.On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> stylistic ceramics, architecture,<strong>and</strong> settlement patterns, Roney (1995, 1996) documentedchanges from <strong>the</strong> A.D. 1100s through 1350 in<strong>the</strong> larger region <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong>. Divergencefrom <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong>an regional network began during <strong>the</strong>early A.D. 1100s, when nor<strong>the</strong>rn sites adopt carbonpaint (<strong>the</strong> McElmo <strong>and</strong> Mesa Verde black-on-whites),while <strong>the</strong> south retains mineral-painted ceramics(Tularosa Black-on-white) <strong>and</strong> demonstrates a gradualevolution <strong>of</strong> sites. Thus, <strong>the</strong> earlier system thatevidenced more uniform use <strong>of</strong> Gallup <strong>and</strong> Escavadablack-on-white types <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> publicarchitecture (great houses, greatkivas, <strong>of</strong>ten connectedby roads) slowly disintegrated.During <strong>the</strong> drought from A.D. 1130 to 1180, <strong>the</strong>Red Mesa Valley, <strong>the</strong> Dutton Plateau, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> floor <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> are mostly ab<strong>and</strong>oned. A number<strong>of</strong> communities that are defined by <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong>Mesa Verde ceramics are found along <strong>the</strong> Rio Puercoat this time. Three communities that had been establishedearlier (<strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Guadalupe<strong>and</strong> Salado communities) continued, albeit withgreatly reduced populations. Roney (1996) considered<strong>the</strong> possibility that <strong>the</strong>se were ab<strong>and</strong>oned by A.D.1150. Between A.D. 1150 <strong>and</strong> 1200, however, newsettlements were begun (e.g., at Torreon <strong>and</strong> Jones<strong>Canyon</strong>, <strong>and</strong> possibly at Ojito <strong>and</strong> Coots Ridge).Separated from <strong>the</strong>se communities by vast distancesare o<strong>the</strong>rs that survived on Chacra Mesa, along <strong>the</strong><strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> River, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Chuska Valley, <strong>and</strong> a fewto <strong>the</strong> east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rio Puerco Valley. Based on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!