13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

268 <strong>Chaco</strong> Project Syn<strong>the</strong>sismigrated north, <strong>and</strong> lived <strong>and</strong> organized society in<strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> for <strong>the</strong>ir benefit. The Mesoamericanswould have brought advanced skills in road-building,water control, <strong>and</strong> building construction. Interactionbetween <strong>the</strong> regions fell apart when <strong>the</strong> Anasazisettlement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Four Comers area collapsed, dueei<strong>the</strong>r to environmental deterioration that caused withdrawalor local rebellion or to <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong>aggressive nomadic tribes that infiltrated <strong>the</strong> area. ForDiPeso (1968a, 1968b, 1974), after A.D. 1030 <strong>the</strong>culture center from which Mesoamericans, originallyfrom Tula, operated was Casas Gr<strong>and</strong>es, Chihuahua.In his model, cessation <strong>of</strong> interaction was tied to <strong>the</strong>collapse <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Toltec empire in <strong>the</strong> A.D. 1100s.Aztec traders, called pochteca, provided a modelfor how <strong>the</strong> Mesoamerican core exp<strong>and</strong>ed into distantl<strong>and</strong>s. Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pochteca belonged to a guild,but sometimes <strong>the</strong>y operated alone as <strong>the</strong>y went longdistances into new l<strong>and</strong>s for rare resources. Oncelong-term trading relationships had been established,caravans were organized to go to places where facilitieshad been set up <strong>and</strong> agreements worked out.Entrepreneurial families lived in enclaves <strong>and</strong>managed <strong>the</strong> economic aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se interactions;<strong>the</strong>y also brought <strong>the</strong>ir religion <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir warriors toprotect <strong>the</strong>m. Pochteca were high-status members <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> society <strong>and</strong> possessed luxury items that localpeople did not have. It was expected that <strong>the</strong> placeswhere <strong>the</strong>y lived <strong>and</strong> worked in foreign areas woulddiffer from those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local population, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>ywould control <strong>the</strong> possession <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> objects<strong>the</strong>y brought with <strong>the</strong>m for trade. Although <strong>the</strong>pochteca model was specific to <strong>the</strong> Aztec, similartypes <strong>of</strong> trade guilds with trocadores (Kelley 1980)were posited for ancestral groups, including <strong>the</strong>Toltec, who were contemporary with <strong>Chaco</strong>an people.Frisbie (1978, 1980) <strong>and</strong> Reyman (1978b) examined<strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> Mesoamerican high-statusburials in <strong>Chaco</strong>an sites. Such Mesoamerican burialsare <strong>of</strong>ten accompanied by dogs, numerous gravegoods, <strong>and</strong> ceremonial items. Taller individuals tendto have more grave goods than <strong>the</strong> average-sizeperson. Thus, <strong>the</strong> burials in Pueblo Bonito couldrepresent <strong>the</strong> Mesoamerican leaders in <strong>Chaco</strong> (Frisbie1978). When Reyman (1978b) examined data fromthree sites in <strong>the</strong> Southwest, he concluded that <strong>the</strong>magician from Ridge ruin was a pochteca-like leaderwho died en route, <strong>and</strong> that Burials 13 <strong>and</strong> 14 inRoom 33 at Pueblo Bonito were ei<strong>the</strong>r members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>pochteca or in <strong>the</strong>ir employ, but that <strong>the</strong> warrior inAztec ruin may have been a high-status individual bu<strong>the</strong> was not apochteca. More recently, Turner (1993;Turner <strong>and</strong> Turner 1995, 1999) considered toothtransfigurement on a burial from Room 330 in PuebloBonito, which is nearly identical to a practice commonin Mesoamerica, to indicate <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a sou<strong>the</strong>rnwarrior in <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>.To date, no Mesoamerian skeletal remains havebeen identified among <strong>the</strong> human remains in <strong>Chaco</strong><strong>Canyon</strong> (Akins 1986; Schillaci et al. 2001). The adultmale maxilla from Room 330 that Turner <strong>and</strong> Turner(1999:128-129, 473-476) indicated had tooth transfigurement(no. 326095) has a fused right upperincisor <strong>and</strong> canine that may mark a congenital pattern,one that was also seen in ano<strong>the</strong>r adult in Room320A. Unfortunately, <strong>the</strong>ir report did not indicatesuch fusion in any burials attributed to Room 320A;<strong>the</strong> closest similar description <strong>the</strong>y record is for Burial327077, which exhibited an enlarged right lowersecond incisor <strong>and</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> canine. Akins (1986:TableB.l) includes Burial 327077 among those from Room326. In her craniometric study, this individual fellwithin <strong>the</strong> population from <strong>the</strong> western rooms <strong>of</strong>Pueblo Bonito; Schillaci et al. (2001) clearly retainedthis burial within <strong>the</strong> Pueblo population. If <strong>the</strong>assumption <strong>of</strong> a congenital relationship between <strong>the</strong>setwo burials is accepted, <strong>the</strong> transfigurement on <strong>the</strong>tooth in Room 330 represents a Pueblo man <strong>and</strong> not aMexican who moved north. This individual may havetraveled south, possibly to Teacapan, a site in <strong>the</strong>Marismas Nacionales region on <strong>the</strong> border betweenSinaloa <strong>and</strong> Nayarit, that Turner <strong>and</strong> Turner (1999)indicate is contemporary with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong>an culture <strong>and</strong>where <strong>the</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> tooth disfigurment is documented(Gill 1985:195). This <strong>Chaco</strong>an may havelived among <strong>the</strong> population, been adopted into asociety, <strong>and</strong> learned new techniques before bringinghis new knowledge, a number <strong>of</strong> shells, <strong>and</strong> possiblyo<strong>the</strong>r material back to <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>.Almost all Mesoamerican artifacts present in <strong>the</strong>Southwest could have been brought by only a fewindividuals (Haury 1976: 347). Based on a comparisonwith seventeenth-century Spanish in New Mexico,however, Frisbie (1985) suggested that many artifactsmay not be needed to represent <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> aforeign group among <strong>the</strong> Pueblo people. Frisbie

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!