13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter ThreeThe Preceramic Period in <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>Tnere has been no investigation <strong>of</strong> non-ceramic sites in <strong>the</strong> general <strong>Chaco</strong> area. Such sites do exist. Theyare confined to high, s<strong>and</strong>y ridges on <strong>the</strong> Chacra Mesa <strong>and</strong> east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Monument. They occur as hearthareas <strong>and</strong> slab hearths eroding out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>and</strong>; <strong>the</strong> hearths are accompanied by abundant flint chips. Thetypes <strong>of</strong> points or blades from which <strong>the</strong>se were derived are unknown <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sites have received onlypassing attention from <strong>the</strong> senior author. They mayor may not have any direct connection with <strong>the</strong>following long <strong>and</strong> imperfectly understood period. (Gordon Vivian <strong>and</strong> Ma<strong>the</strong>ws 1965:28)Although several sites indicated a preceramicpresence around <strong>the</strong> basin's peripheries (Agogino1960; Agogino <strong>and</strong> Hester 1953, 1956; Alex<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong>Reiter 1935; Bryan <strong>and</strong> Toulouse 1943; Campbell <strong>and</strong>Ellis 1952; Mohr <strong>and</strong> Sample 1959; Reinhart 1967;<strong>and</strong> Renaud 1942), in 1969, very little was knownabout <strong>the</strong> Preceramic period, not just in <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>but throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong>. Dittert et al.(1961) recorded several sites in <strong>the</strong> Navajo Reservoirarea <strong>and</strong> Cynthia Irwin-Williams was conducting <strong>the</strong>Anasazi Origins Project (1964 to 1969) along <strong>the</strong>Arroyo Cuervo in <strong>the</strong> Rio Puerco drainage specificallyto learn more about <strong>the</strong> Archaic adaptation (Irwin­Williams 1994:571-572). The<strong>Chaco</strong>Prospectus(NPS1969:4) stated that itA survey specifically orientedtoward recovery <strong>of</strong> preceramic information ism<strong>and</strong>atory. The establishment <strong>of</strong> typology <strong>and</strong> criteriafor cultural subdivisions, if any, is necessary.This survey should include all physiographicsituations. It is suggested that <strong>the</strong> survey be extendedbeyond <strong>the</strong> canyon environment, especially to <strong>the</strong> eastin <strong>the</strong> Chacra Mesa area. II The need to reconstruct <strong>the</strong>Preceramic ecosystem by determining <strong>the</strong> vegetation<strong>the</strong>n present was emphasized.Since that time, cultural resource managementstudies in this section <strong>of</strong> northwestern New Mexicohave contributed a comparative wealth <strong>of</strong> informationon surface sites, plus limited data from three rockshelters in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> area. Much <strong>of</strong> thisinformation has been summarized by o<strong>the</strong>rs (e.g.,Elliott 1986; Vierra 1994; Gwinn Vivian 1990). Thischapter will outline <strong>the</strong> models available for interpreting<strong>the</strong> Paleoindian <strong>and</strong> Archaic periods, present<strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> Project survey <strong>and</strong> excavation,<strong>and</strong> suggest how <strong>the</strong>se data fit within currentknowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Preceramic adaptation in <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong><strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong>.Models for <strong>the</strong> Preceramic AdaptationAs <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> Project was under way, severalmodels for a Paleoindian <strong>and</strong> Archaic adaptation innor<strong>the</strong>rn New Mexico provided a framework foranalysis <strong>and</strong> for comparative studies. Environmentalchange was <strong>the</strong> major variable considered by Irwin­Williams (1973), Judge (1971, published in 1973),Reinhart (1968), <strong>and</strong> Lyons (1969), but culturalvariables were not excluded.Irwin-Williams outlined changes that occurred in<strong>the</strong> Southwest from Paleoindian through Archaicperiods (Irwin-Williams 1967, 1968a, 1968b) <strong>and</strong>reported on excavation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> En Medio rockshelterthat was part <strong>of</strong> her Anasazi Origins Project (Irwin­Williams <strong>and</strong> Tompkins 1968). She proposed that <strong>the</strong>Paleoindians who utilized <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> prior to8,500 B. C. were part <strong>of</strong> a plains-based hunting culturecharacterized by specific fluted point types (e.g.,Clovis around 9,300 B. C., <strong>and</strong> Folsom from 8,500 to7,500 B.C.). With <strong>the</strong> last Paleoindian occupationidentified as makers <strong>of</strong> Cody points about 6,000 B. C.,changes in <strong>the</strong> environment brought about an eastwardshift in large faunal species <strong>and</strong> a movement <strong>of</strong> hunters

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!