13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Classic Adaptation 199<strong>and</strong> fir beams (Dean <strong>and</strong> Warren 1983). Initial inferencesthat wood beams came from long distances (<strong>the</strong>Chuska Mountains <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mount Taylor area) haverecently been confirmed (Dur<strong>and</strong> et al. 1999; Englishet al. 2001). (Ei<strong>the</strong>r members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local populationmade trips to <strong>the</strong>se areas on a regular basis to obtain<strong>the</strong> timbers, or <strong>the</strong> timbers were brought into <strong>the</strong>canyon by those living in <strong>the</strong> distant areas or <strong>the</strong>irdown-<strong>the</strong>-line neighbors. Lekson (1984a) assumed <strong>the</strong>former in his labor calculations-see below.)Construction techniques are fairly easy todeduce. Analyzing <strong>the</strong> sequence on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> choice<strong>of</strong> site, area leveling or preparation, laying <strong>of</strong> foundations,constructions <strong>of</strong> walls (usually one story at atime, with ro<strong>of</strong>s used as platforms for <strong>the</strong> upper story)was complicated mostly by <strong>the</strong> razing <strong>of</strong> older sections<strong>and</strong> rebuilding in <strong>the</strong> same aiea. Sometimes foundationswere ignored when walls were laid (see Windes1987[11] for examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset walls at Pueblo Alto).The change in use <strong>of</strong> single-width stones with thickmortar to cores with tightly compacted stone veneers(Figure 6.2) that would add strength sufficient to holdup several stories suggests improvement 1D constructiontechniques through time.Tree-ring dates suggested several major constructionperiods for great houses (Lekson 1984a, 1984b).The earliest pattern (A.D. 900 to 940, with <strong>the</strong> initialconstruction now placed in <strong>the</strong> late A.D. 800s byWindes <strong>and</strong> D. Ford [1996]) is visible in PuebloBonito, Penasco Blanco, <strong>and</strong> Una Vida. It consists <strong>of</strong>a multi storied , arc-shaped building composed <strong>of</strong> suitescontaining a ramada/living room in front, with a largeroom <strong>and</strong> paired storage rooms behind. In front <strong>of</strong>every two to three suites is a pit structure. Firepits infront rooms suggest domestic functions. Although<strong>the</strong>se buildings were similar in layout to that <strong>of</strong> contemporaneoussmall sites, <strong>the</strong> increased amount <strong>of</strong>space per unit, <strong>the</strong> higher ratio <strong>of</strong> rectangular roomsper round room, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> increased labor investmentwere interpreted as <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> local leaders orelite within a community comprised <strong>of</strong> a great house<strong>and</strong> surrounding small sites. Great houses providedincreased storage area for goods needed to carry out<strong>the</strong> elite's functions within <strong>the</strong> community. The threeinitially identified settlements were located at <strong>the</strong>confluence <strong>of</strong> major side drainages that flowed into<strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> (Judge et al. 1981), possibly giving<strong>the</strong>se communities an advantage with regard to wateravailable for agriculture.During <strong>the</strong> 80 years between A.D. 940 <strong>and</strong>1020, within <strong>the</strong> central canyon only Hungo Pavi wasbuilt at <strong>the</strong> mouth <strong>of</strong> Mockingbird <strong>Canyon</strong>, a smallerside drainage. Although <strong>the</strong>re are a number <strong>of</strong> smallsites near this great house, <strong>the</strong> cluster is not asconcentrated as those around <strong>the</strong> initial three greathouses. Hungo Pavi is similar in size but differs fromits predecessors in that <strong>the</strong> back wall is straight ra<strong>the</strong>rthan arcuate. This form, which is dated between A.D.990 <strong>and</strong> 1010 at Hungo Pavi, becomes <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardfor all later construction at new great houses; e.g.,Pueblo Alto (a road-related building) <strong>and</strong> Chetro Ketl.Between A.D. 1020 <strong>and</strong> 1050, constructionbegan at Pueblo Alto <strong>and</strong> Chetro Ketl, <strong>and</strong> PuebloBonito gained an exterior row <strong>of</strong> storage rooms.Nei<strong>the</strong>r Pueblo Alto nor Chetro Ketl were located atconfluences with side drainages; ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y are nottoo distant from Pueblo Bonito in <strong>the</strong> area that Leksonproposed as becoming "downtown" <strong>Chaco</strong>. Leksonsuggested that Chetro Ketl <strong>and</strong> Hungo Pavi mightrepresent an association with sites outside <strong>the</strong> canyon.Although <strong>the</strong> individual units at great houses continueto resemble those at small sites from A.D. 900 to1050 in form, <strong>and</strong> firepits continued to appear in frontrooms, Lekson (1984a:264) noted that <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong>round to rectangular rooms at small sites had increasedthrough time (1:2.7 during <strong>the</strong> A.D. 800s; 1:3.6during <strong>the</strong> middle A.D. 900s; <strong>and</strong> 1:6.0 during <strong>the</strong>early A.D. lO00s); <strong>and</strong> that at great houses it is stilllarger, at 1: 9.3. If <strong>the</strong> rectangular rooms are devotedto storage, <strong>the</strong> great houses have much larger storagecapacity than small house sites.The only new great house constructed betweenA.D. 1050 <strong>and</strong> 1075 is Pueblo del Arroyo, but <strong>the</strong>rewere additions to several existing large pueblos; e.g.,rear-row rooms, upper stories, <strong>and</strong> massive blocks <strong>of</strong>rooms that have little access from <strong>the</strong> exterior. Forthis period, Lekson (1984a:60) distinguished betweentower kivas (kivas with more than one story), clankivas (kivas built on <strong>the</strong> second story <strong>of</strong> a buildingthat may have had domestic use), <strong>and</strong> great kivas thatwere located in <strong>the</strong> plazas. The elevated circularrooms had no clear associations with room suites.There was also a decrease in <strong>the</strong> size difference

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!