13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

------~ --- - ---l34 <strong>Chaco</strong> Project Syn<strong>the</strong>sishave unusually large firepits, possibly indicative <strong>of</strong>special preparation areas.Some specialized tasks were carried out at thissite. Lapidary tool kits <strong>and</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> turquoisepieces on <strong>the</strong> bench in Pithouse B <strong>and</strong> in Plaza Area 5suggest jewelry-making (McKenna 1984:275, 306,Table 5; Mathien 1984). The bone tool kites) on <strong>the</strong>bench also suggest a variety <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r tasks (McKenna1984:335). Although a number <strong>of</strong> ceramic items thatcould have been part <strong>of</strong> a potter's tool kit were presentin Pithouse B, <strong>the</strong> tools were multifunctional in nature<strong>and</strong> could not be considered representative <strong>of</strong> a fulltimespecialist's tool kit. Because McKenna believedthat 29S11360 was last used during <strong>the</strong> winter, <strong>and</strong>pottery-making was a warm-wea<strong>the</strong>r activity, hesuspected that such a tool kit may not be easily seen.A large number <strong>of</strong> ceramics <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> somewhat limitedvariability in certain production traits on black-onwhiteitems also add weight to <strong>the</strong> proposition <strong>of</strong>onsite ceramic production (McKenna 1984:203-204).Several unusual finds led McKenna to entertaina relationship between <strong>the</strong> inhabitants <strong>of</strong>29SJ1360 <strong>and</strong>Pueblo Bonito. Bin 1, located north <strong>of</strong> Room 3/10<strong>and</strong> east <strong>of</strong> Room 11 in House 1, resembled a pen for<strong>the</strong> confinement <strong>of</strong> birds. The recovery <strong>of</strong> five elementsfrom an old macaw in <strong>the</strong> overburden or backdirtrepresent <strong>the</strong> only known macaw remains from<strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> not found in a great house site.Recovery <strong>of</strong> macaws from several locations <strong>and</strong>numerous complete macaw skeletons at Pueblo Bonito(Judd 1964; Pepper 1920) suggests <strong>the</strong>y were kept forspecial purposes. Additionally, one cylinder jar sherdat 29SJ1360 (McKenna 1984:197-191) ties it toPueblo Bonito, which has <strong>the</strong> greatest numbers <strong>of</strong>cylinder jars recovered to date (Pepper 1920; Judd1954; H. Toll 1990).Since McKenna (1984) prepared his report,Akins's (1986) craniometric study <strong>of</strong> a very limitedsample <strong>of</strong> human remains from sites in <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>provides ano<strong>the</strong>r tantalizing clue. She discerned that<strong>the</strong> popUlation buried in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn or central area <strong>of</strong>Pueblo Bonito was more closely related to severalindividuals, including \he women found in Pithouse Bat 29S11360, than <strong>the</strong>y were to <strong>the</strong> popUlation buriedin <strong>the</strong> western area <strong>of</strong> Pueblo Bonito. Burial 2 at29SJ1360 is also <strong>the</strong> only person recovered from anysmall site that had a long str<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> 3,889 disc beads asa necklace. The implications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se data for socialinteraction have not been fully explored. If such arelationship existed, <strong>the</strong>re would be no distinctionamong popUlations living in great houses <strong>and</strong> smallhouse sites; some people may have lived in smallhouses <strong>and</strong> buried <strong>the</strong>ir dead in Pueblo Bonito.29SJ627This site (Figure 5.3), located on <strong>the</strong> south side<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> Wash in Marcia's Rincon, is <strong>the</strong> largest<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> small sites excavated by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> Project.Construction <strong>and</strong> remodeling <strong>of</strong> a row <strong>of</strong> rooms along<strong>the</strong> western edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> room block <strong>and</strong> its associatedfeatures (ramadas <strong>and</strong> pit structures) started in <strong>the</strong>middle A.D. 700s <strong>and</strong> continued into <strong>the</strong> middle A.D.lOOOs (Figure 5.4), suggesting an occupation <strong>of</strong> morethan 300 years. Changes in pit structure form <strong>and</strong>function (pithouse to kiva) were documented, as werechanges in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above-groundstructures. Site use peaked around <strong>the</strong> middle A.D.looos, yet <strong>the</strong>re is evidence <strong>of</strong> some use in <strong>the</strong> earlyA.D. 1100s (Truell 1992).Wall construction at 29SJ627 includes plastereddirt walls, puddled adobe lining, turtlebacks withspalls, upright slab <strong>and</strong> turtleback foundations, <strong>and</strong>single horizontal masonry. With <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong>Kiva E, pit structure walls were cut into <strong>the</strong> ground<strong>and</strong> plastered; <strong>the</strong>re was limited evidence <strong>of</strong> masonry.McKenna (1986:82) suggested that <strong>the</strong> simplemasonry in Kiva E <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn wall <strong>and</strong> wingwall <strong>of</strong> Pithouse C may have functioned as a retainingwall for fill into which <strong>the</strong> structures had been builtra<strong>the</strong>r than adoption <strong>of</strong> a masonry style. Throughtime, <strong>the</strong> pit structures at 29SJ627 tend to decrease insize, become more rounded, <strong>and</strong> be placed deeperbelow <strong>the</strong> surface. Placement <strong>of</strong> floor features becamemore formalized; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se featuresdecreased through time. McKenna (1986:84) indicatedthat orientation <strong>of</strong> kivas in a north-south alignmentstabilized by <strong>the</strong> mid-A.D. looos.Truell (1992) divided <strong>the</strong> 25 rooms into foursuites (A through D). Suites A, B, <strong>and</strong> C were builtfirst (possibly in <strong>the</strong> late A.D. 800s, based on <strong>the</strong>presence <strong>of</strong> Red Mesa ceramics). Pithouse C probablyserved all three suites. Suite D was constructed slightlylater <strong>and</strong> is probably associated with Pit StructureF. Typical <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pattern recorded throughout <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!