13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Florescence 165Ceramics dating to <strong>the</strong> A. D. ll00s were foundin several transects across <strong>the</strong> site, including <strong>the</strong> OldHouse. These late sherds, plus subdivisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>vaults in Great Kiva 2 <strong>and</strong> crude masonry modificationsto <strong>the</strong> firepit, indicate late use <strong>of</strong> this site.Viewed within a community context, KinNahasbas is thought to have been part <strong>of</strong> an earlycluster <strong>of</strong> sites near Una Vida (Windes 1993d). Bothgreat houses were built using similar masonry stylesthat indicate construction by <strong>the</strong> A.D. 900s; both hadsimilar ceramic types. Una Vida, however, tended tobe approximately eight times larger during this earlyperiod (2,330 vs. 283 m 2 ). Four small sites foundnearby (Mathien <strong>and</strong> Windes 1988:Figure 3) represent<strong>the</strong> entire span <strong>of</strong> occupation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great houses.Within a 2-km radius, <strong>the</strong>re are 65 contemporaneousPueblo II <strong>and</strong> Puebio III smaii houses; <strong>the</strong>se greathouses are considered part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fajada Butte community(Windes 1993).The function <strong>of</strong> two nearby <strong>and</strong> contemporaneousgreat houses merits discussion. Althoughfactionalism <strong>and</strong> proximity toa water source or water<strong>and</strong> field system were considered, Windes (Mathien<strong>and</strong> Windes 1988:100-101) suggested visibility as <strong>the</strong>reason for <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> Kin Nahasbas. During <strong>the</strong>A.D. 900s, <strong>the</strong> earliest great houses in <strong>the</strong> canyon(Pueblo Bonito, Penasco Blanco, <strong>and</strong> Una Vida) wereall visible from Kin Nahasbas. In contrast to UnaVida, during <strong>the</strong> A.D. lO00s this site also could beenpart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> signaling system <strong>and</strong> shrine network. Thenumber <strong>of</strong> rooms in <strong>the</strong> Old House did not suggest aneed for a great kiva at this site; if this great kiva wereused by o<strong>the</strong>r inhabitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community, KinNahasbas may have served more than one specialfunction within this community.<strong>Chaco</strong> East Community. Ano<strong>the</strong>r great housewith early masonry that suggests construction during<strong>the</strong> A.D. 900s is located up canyon <strong>and</strong> outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>park boundaries where a major drainage empties into<strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> Wash (Windes et al. 2000). Although astraight line <strong>of</strong> visibility between this site <strong>and</strong> those in<strong>the</strong> main section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon did not exist, Windeset al. (2000:39, Figure 4.1 <strong>and</strong> Figure 4.2) suggestedthat this community was linked with four o<strong>the</strong>rsthrough a system <strong>of</strong> communication shrines describedin Hayes <strong>and</strong> Windes (1975). No excavations havebeen conducted; survey at local small sites <strong>and</strong>analysis <strong>of</strong> sherds <strong>and</strong> lithics indicate mobility among<strong>the</strong> inhabitants who ab<strong>and</strong>oned <strong>the</strong> early community.Closer ties to <strong>the</strong> Pueblo Pintado community than <strong>the</strong>main canyon are suggested (Windes et al. 2000).Shrines, Signaling Stations, <strong>and</strong> a CommunicationSystemDuring excavation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Basketmaker III pitstructures <strong>and</strong> great kiva at 29SJ423, an unusualarcuate wall (Figure 5.23), 15 m long <strong>and</strong> 30 em high(possibly rising to 52 em), constructed <strong>of</strong> coursedcompound masonry set in mortar, was discovered(Hayes <strong>and</strong> Windes 1975). The crudely scrabbledstones <strong>and</strong> irregular width, plus <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> somemetate fragments in its construction suggested a latedate, but <strong>the</strong>re were no sherds from <strong>the</strong> Pueblo II toIII periods to fur<strong>the</strong>r refine its chronological placement.Approximately 6.5 m south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> gentler arc was a pile <strong>of</strong> shallow mounded trash.In this pile was a pecked s<strong>and</strong>stone bowl with a flatbottom. It was surrounded by tabular dry-laid s<strong>and</strong>stoneslabs rising as high as <strong>the</strong> rim, <strong>and</strong> it wascovered by a rectangular s<strong>and</strong>stone slab that had arectangular hole in its center (Figure 5.24). When <strong>the</strong>shaped cover for this hole was removed, 146 turquoisebeads <strong>and</strong> three turquoise chips were found in a bowl.Also recovered in <strong>the</strong> area adjacent to <strong>the</strong> mound <strong>and</strong>wall were 184 turquoise beads, two black shale beads,one shell bead, 148 turquoise chips, <strong>and</strong> a smallMcElmo Black-on-white bowl that contained oneturquoise bead. Because this arc arrangement iscommon in Historic Pueblo shrines, a ritual activity(possibly a sun-watcher's station or signaling station)was inferred.Clear visibility from 29SJ423 extends 90 milesto <strong>the</strong> north, past Huerfano Butte to <strong>the</strong> La PlataMountains, as well as to <strong>the</strong> Chuska Mountains in <strong>the</strong>west. Within <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>, only three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> largepueblos or great houses could not be seen (Una Vida,Chetro Ketl, <strong>and</strong> Hungo Pavi). However, two featuressimilar to <strong>the</strong> one at 29SJ423 (29SJ1207, locatedon top <strong>of</strong> South Mesa due south <strong>of</strong> Pueblo Bonito, <strong>and</strong>29S1706, at <strong>the</strong> east end <strong>of</strong> South Mesa) provide sucha line <strong>of</strong> sight for all but Una Vida. As a result,Hayes <strong>and</strong> Windes (1975: 152) suspected that KinNahasbas was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger Una Vida settlementor that <strong>the</strong> raised kiva in <strong>the</strong> west wing <strong>of</strong> Una Vidamight have been a possible linking station. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!