13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46 <strong>Chaco</strong> Project Syn<strong>the</strong>sisnel present at 3,700 B.P. <strong>and</strong> one at 2,400 B.P. Loverecognized that pit structures are present 2 to 4 mbelow <strong>the</strong> present surface <strong>and</strong> suggested that <strong>the</strong>channel was entrenched at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir construction<strong>and</strong> use. Judd (1964) documented severalold channels south <strong>of</strong> Pueblo Bonito between A.D.900 <strong>and</strong> 1127. Love (1977b:215) cited 29SJ550, a. Pueblo II field house with cored masonry betweenWijiji <strong>and</strong> Shabik'eshchee at a depth <strong>of</strong> 2 to 3 m, aspossibly having been constructed on <strong>the</strong> banks <strong>of</strong> aburied channel. South <strong>of</strong> Pueblo del Arroyo is an oldchannel containing walls with late masonry styles thatdate post-A.D. 1050. These data suggest <strong>the</strong> possibility<strong>of</strong> more than one channel. Laminated gray claylayers, which Nichols (1975) dated at A.D. 1250,were found in <strong>the</strong> stratigraphy near Chetro Ked.Similar layers were found in Senter's (1937) post­A.D. 1050 strata. They suggest flooding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyonfloor; <strong>the</strong>re probably was no channel at that time.Thus, <strong>the</strong> record for <strong>the</strong> past 1,000 years suggestsseveral cut <strong>and</strong> fill episodes, not all <strong>of</strong> which were 12m deep, but <strong>the</strong>y do indicate alternate periods <strong>of</strong>entrenchment <strong>and</strong> filling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> arroyo, probablyto different heights during different times (Figure2.3).Although <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> trees on <strong>the</strong> valleyfloor during <strong>the</strong> early Pueblo occupation has beendebated, D. Love (1977b:232-234) found no indication<strong>of</strong> large trees. Each tree species has specificrequirements. For example, Love (l977b) reportedthat ponderosa pine requires 355.6 cm (14 in) <strong>of</strong>rain,but precipitation only averages about 222.5 cm in<strong>Chaco</strong>. Judd (1964:18) documented a small st<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>pines at <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> <strong>and</strong> four dead pinesin Werito's Rincon in <strong>the</strong> 1920s, plus <strong>the</strong> remains <strong>of</strong>one rotted pine in <strong>the</strong> West Court <strong>of</strong> Pueblo Bonito.Windes et al. (2000) recorded several individualponderosas on Chacra Mesa near <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> Eastcommunity. Judd (1954:10) cited Jackson (1878),who indicated that willows <strong>and</strong> cottonwoods werenumerous in 1877; by <strong>the</strong> 1920s <strong>the</strong>re were stillseveral on <strong>the</strong> south side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon. These speciesgrow shallow roots, <strong>and</strong> a decrease in <strong>the</strong> water tablecould cause <strong>the</strong>ir disappearance. Shattuck (personalcommunication, 2003) indicates some seep populusremain even during <strong>the</strong> recent five-year droughtperiod. The presence <strong>of</strong> a prehistoric forest isdoubted; but <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> some species duringtimes when a high water table was present is likely.Palynological ReconstructionHall (1975,1977) accepted Bryan's (1954) geomorphologicalresults, in which <strong>the</strong> latter indicatedthat two periods <strong>of</strong> erosion <strong>and</strong> sedimentation in <strong>the</strong><strong>Chaco</strong> arroyo served as a baseline. Hall's initialanalysis <strong>of</strong> 18 radiocarbon dates (Hall 1977:Table 1)<strong>and</strong> alluvial pollen samples from four locations in <strong>the</strong><strong>Chaco</strong> Wash, two in <strong>the</strong> Gallo Wash, <strong>and</strong> sevensurface pollen stations (Hall 1977:Figure 1) provideddata that allowed him to describe five alluvial units<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir relative dates, as well as shifts in <strong>the</strong>dominant arboreal vegetation over a period <strong>of</strong> 7,000years (Hall 1975, 1977, 1983).Hall assumed that <strong>the</strong> major source <strong>of</strong> pollen insurface material is upstream. "If <strong>the</strong> conclusion isaccepted that pollen in alluvium comes from sheeterosion <strong>of</strong> surface materials <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> surface pollenis a mixture <strong>of</strong> many years <strong>of</strong> accumulation, <strong>the</strong>nfluctuations in climate <strong>and</strong> in plant communities <strong>of</strong>less than many years duration will likely beundetected" (Hall 1975:39-40). Theperiodsmeasuredwould fall within 100 years, at best. D. Love (1980)realized that Hall did not recognize <strong>the</strong> differentsources <strong>of</strong> alluvial fill (headwater <strong>and</strong> local) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>different facies within <strong>the</strong> fill at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> his earlypublication. Because it is necessary to underst<strong>and</strong>conditions that affect <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> each unit(where <strong>the</strong> material came from <strong>and</strong> how long it took t<strong>of</strong>orm <strong>the</strong> unit), Love suggested that Hall's sequencewas <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> alternating different kinds <strong>of</strong>deposits, <strong>and</strong> that it <strong>the</strong>refore may not be climaticallyaccurate. Later work by Hall recognized this problem(Hall 1990:325).Hall (1977:Figure 13) divided his data into threepollen zones <strong>and</strong> seven sub zones. These subzonesmay be more specific to <strong>Chaco</strong> than <strong>the</strong>y are to <strong>the</strong>region (Hall 1977:1609). The climatic history in <strong>the</strong><strong>Chaco</strong> area fit <strong>the</strong> broad regional pattern <strong>of</strong> "cooler<strong>and</strong> more moist conditions during glacial times, amoderately warm <strong>and</strong> dry early postglacial period, amid-postglacial interval <strong>of</strong> greater dryness <strong>and</strong>warmth, <strong>and</strong> a late postglacial reverse in climate tomoderately warm <strong>and</strong> dry conditions" (Hall 1977:1613). The details for <strong>Chaco</strong>, however, differed; Hallnoted an abrupt onset <strong>of</strong> arid conditions around 5,800years ago. The period <strong>of</strong> greatest aridity fell between5,600 to 2,400 B.P. ra<strong>the</strong>r than 7,500 to 4,000 years

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!