13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Basketmaker III to Pueblo I 119Families subsisted on com, beans, <strong>and</strong> squash,supplemented by protein obtained by capturing gardenpests, local rabbits, <strong>and</strong> some larger game animalsfrom <strong>the</strong> area. If Hayes's (1981) population estimatesare correct <strong>and</strong> Akins's (1985) estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> humanpopulation that could be fed by hunting local animalsis reasonable, <strong>the</strong>n Akins's conclusion that game musthave been hunted outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon as early asBasketmaker III suggests a need for continuous movementout <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon by at least a small portion <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> local population to obtain meat. That contactswith groups outside <strong>the</strong> canyon existed during BasketmakerIII <strong>and</strong> increased during Pueblo I is confirmedby <strong>the</strong> variety <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> ceramics or <strong>the</strong>ir temper,lithic materials, <strong>and</strong> shell species present. Because<strong>the</strong>re is evidence for local ceramic production, locallyavailable sources <strong>of</strong> chipped stone <strong>and</strong> ground stonetools, <strong>and</strong> much material used for site construction,<strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> imported goods may reflect 1) materialcollected during hunting excursions, 2) ties to o<strong>the</strong>rrelated groups living outside <strong>the</strong> canyon who ei<strong>the</strong>rshared hunting areas or information regarding resources<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir availability, or 3) trade with nonrelatedgroups.The presence <strong>of</strong> turquoise <strong>and</strong> shell <strong>of</strong>feringsduring <strong>the</strong> construction(s) <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> great kiva at 29SJ423suggest that some traditions recorded at later sites mayhave been established during <strong>the</strong> Basketmaker IIIperiod. Akins (1985) also suggested that <strong>the</strong> presence<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> very few bear, wolf, <strong>and</strong> mountain lion partsamong <strong>the</strong> faunal material may reflect earlyceremonial items that retained meaning throughout <strong>the</strong>Puebloan occupation.DiscussionSouthwestern archaeologists recognize that lifein a semiarid environment placed restrictions on <strong>the</strong>agricultural production needed to support a localpopulation. Schelberg (1982a, 1982b) used anecological approach to outline <strong>the</strong> limitations that suchan environment placed on horticulturalists <strong>and</strong>agriculturalists in <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong>. In a stressedenvironment, inhabitants would react to even minorvariations in climate. Seasonal storage would maintain<strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system <strong>and</strong> smooth out fluctuationsin <strong>the</strong> subsistence base. The amount <strong>of</strong>energy available insulates <strong>and</strong> controls <strong>the</strong> system,which can change only when excess energy isavailable. Perturbations can occur in ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> environmentalparameters or population, leading to suchchange. In a semiarid environment, water availabilityis <strong>the</strong> major influence on energy flows that affect bothplant <strong>and</strong> animal life across space <strong>and</strong> through time.Dendroclimatological reconstructions <strong>of</strong> past environments<strong>of</strong>fered clues to changes in precipitation thatmight effect changes in <strong>the</strong> human adaptation.Dendroclimatological reconstructions for <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong><strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> were not well defined for <strong>the</strong> years prior toA.D. 900. Using paleoclimatic data from Dean et ai.(1985), <strong>and</strong> Euler et a1. (1979), Gwinn Vivian (1990:92-94) emphasized broad 50-year patterns that suggestedvariations in periods <strong>of</strong> drought on <strong>the</strong>Colorado Plateau. "The most significant climatic feature<strong>of</strong> this period was <strong>the</strong> decline in total annualmoisture that began at about A.D. 725-750, reachedminimal levels about 875, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n increased toessentially <strong>the</strong> 725 levels by A.D. 1050" (Vivian1990:24). He (Vivian 1990:24) accepted a shift fromwinter-dominant to summer-dominant storm patternsaround A.D. 750 to 775 (Schoenwetter <strong>and</strong> Eddy1964). Summer monsoons were characterized ashaving greater intensity; shorter duration; <strong>and</strong> limitedsoil permeability, <strong>and</strong> thus increased run<strong>of</strong>f. Vivianconsidered two events in <strong>the</strong> period from A.D. 750 to1000 as critical-<strong>the</strong> major drought from A.D. 850 to900, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> shift in periodicity <strong>and</strong> variance <strong>of</strong>precipitation <strong>and</strong> storm dominance-but he recognized<strong>the</strong> period from A.D. 500 to 1200 as being relativelyhigh in moisture values.Judge et aI. (1981) pointed out that <strong>the</strong> droughtfrom A.D. 850 to 900 documented by Euler et aI.(1979) for <strong>the</strong> broader region was not as visible in <strong>the</strong>data reported by Dean <strong>and</strong> Robinson (1977) for <strong>the</strong><strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong>. Additionally, after A.D. 900,summer precipitation peaks seen in <strong>the</strong> dendrochronologicaldata presented by Robinson <strong>and</strong> Rose(1979) do not always correlate with information onannual precipitation. A more detailed interpretation <strong>of</strong>rainfall patterns in <strong>the</strong> tree-ring data <strong>of</strong> Dean <strong>and</strong>Robinson (1977) during <strong>the</strong> Pueblo I period appearedin Windes <strong>and</strong> D. Ford (1996:306-308), who indicatedthat <strong>the</strong>re were several long periods (A.D. 728to 737, A.D. 850 to 864, 887 to 899, <strong>and</strong> A.D. 910to 919) when precipitation levels were above normal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!