13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

------------------- -----240 <strong>Chaco</strong> Project Syn<strong>the</strong>sisDecreased population <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> in <strong>the</strong> mid- tolate A.D. 1100s was not as well organized as that <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> earlier Classic period, but people did obtainvessels from many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same areas as previously.The Mesa Verde Black-on-white ceramics representcontinuity <strong>of</strong> residency in <strong>the</strong> area by people who weremore completely tied to populations <strong>and</strong> events in <strong>the</strong>north or <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> area. McKenna <strong>and</strong> Toll (1991)suggested that <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> area had become <strong>the</strong> focus<strong>of</strong> an economic system that replaced <strong>the</strong> ChuskaValley supply area, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regionshifted from <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> to <strong>the</strong> Aztec communityalong <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> River. Thus, <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> aMesa Verde migration into an empty <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong>was not upheld (McKenna <strong>and</strong> Toll 1991; Toll et al.1980).O<strong>the</strong>r artifact analyses support some continuity<strong>and</strong> some change during <strong>the</strong> Mesa Verde phase. WhenCameron (1991) compared <strong>the</strong> chipped stone from <strong>the</strong>two occupations at 29SJ633, she demonstrated thatwhile <strong>the</strong>re was continuity in lithic sources, <strong>the</strong>re wasmuch less use <strong>of</strong> nonlocal materials during both phasesat this small site than <strong>the</strong>re was for earlier phasematerial from Pueblo Alto. Included in <strong>the</strong> MesaVerde phase were a few pieces <strong>of</strong> obsidian from JemezRidge <strong>and</strong> Red Hill, two sources from which materialrecovered on earlier sites had been obtained. Alsopresent were 31 pieces <strong>of</strong> Narbona (Washington) Passchert (from <strong>the</strong> Chuska Mountains area), 10 pieces <strong>of</strong>yellow-brown spotted chert (from <strong>the</strong> Zuni area), <strong>and</strong>four Morrison Formation cherts. Technology <strong>of</strong>manufacture was expedient.Analysis <strong>of</strong> ornaments <strong>and</strong> minerals indicatedcontinuity in forms <strong>and</strong> materials as well; again, <strong>the</strong>rewere fewer imported materials during <strong>the</strong> Mesa Verdephase than had been seen during <strong>the</strong> Late Bonitophase. Mathien (1991 b) found that <strong>the</strong> imported shellspecies were few (Glycymeris gigantea, Haliotuscracherodii, <strong>and</strong> Olivella dama) <strong>and</strong> similar to speciesfound during <strong>the</strong> Basketmaker <strong>and</strong> Pueblo I periods.As noted above for obsidian, this change suggests areturn to earlier patterns that existed during <strong>the</strong>Basketmaker III <strong>and</strong> Pueblo I periods. Does itrepresent a change in trade networks or an elimination<strong>of</strong> more widespread or sophisticated exchangerelationships for <strong>the</strong> Classic period?In summary, Truell's excavation <strong>of</strong> 29SJ633 (inMathien 1991a) raised several questions aboutcontinuity in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> area, movements<strong>of</strong> people within <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> changes noted. Gwinn Vivian (who reviewedsections <strong>of</strong> Truell's report) subdivided <strong>the</strong> Mesa Verdephase into two components: Late McElmo <strong>and</strong> EarlyMesa Verde (A.D. 1170 to 1220), <strong>and</strong> Late MesaVerde (A.D. 1220 to 1350). These divisions werebased on survey <strong>of</strong>Chacra Mesa during <strong>the</strong> late 1950s,which revealed <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> crescent-shaped sites<strong>and</strong> cliff dwellings that he considered contemporaneous<strong>and</strong> attributable to <strong>the</strong> period when McElmo<strong>and</strong> early Mesa Verde black-on-white types, plus St.Johns, Houck, <strong>and</strong> Querino ceramics, were beingused. (McKenna [1991] now recognizes Houck <strong>and</strong>Querino ceramics as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wingate Polychromeseries dated ca. A.D. 1175 to 1210.) Fortified buttetopsites with later ceramics were fewer in number <strong>and</strong>found in different locations. Gwinn Vivian (1974a)thought that <strong>the</strong>se sites dated to A.D. 1250 <strong>and</strong>possibly later. He attributed <strong>the</strong> change in locations toa shift in farming practices from those using floodwaterirrigation to those using dry farming techniques;<strong>the</strong> higher altitude <strong>and</strong> cooler temperatures, <strong>and</strong>perhaps increased precipitation, would have allowedthis change. Areas far<strong>the</strong>r east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon had beensettled late-only after A.D. 1075 to 1100. Thechanges in rainfall patterns at A. D. 1080 were thoughtto initiate a slow decline in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> dominance <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong>; <strong>the</strong> later droughts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twelfth<strong>and</strong> thirteenth centuries were more difficult <strong>and</strong>necessitated continuing changes that result in <strong>the</strong> MesaVerde phase (Vivian 1990:383-389).The slow eastward movement is now accepted bysome investigators. "This intense late occupation isevident east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> East community, shifting to <strong>the</strong> top<strong>of</strong> Chacra Mesa east <strong>of</strong> Pueblo Pintado <strong>Canyon</strong>(Roney 1996). Overall, classic Mesa Verde Black-onwhite,marking occupation by 1250 or later, was rare"(Windes et al. 2000:43). Windes (1987, <strong>and</strong> inCameron <strong>and</strong> Toll 2001:Table 1) now divides <strong>the</strong>Pueblo III period into two phases:The McElmo Phase. This phase falls betweenapproximately A.D. 1140 <strong>and</strong> 1200. It is characterizedby <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> McElmo Black-on-whitesherds <strong>and</strong> an indented corrugated pottery with rock,sherd, <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong> temper. Dendroclimatologicalreconstruction indicates that this period included a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!