13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Broader Perspective 333Among archaeological distributions in Europe,<strong>the</strong>re was much diversity in hunter-ga<strong>the</strong>rer populationsthat previously inhabited <strong>the</strong> area where <strong>the</strong>LBK culture is located. Binford suggestedthat much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cultural diversity extantamong hunter-ga<strong>the</strong>rers was replaced byrelative homogeneity across <strong>the</strong> same range<strong>of</strong> environmental variability. It is reasonableto imagine that <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> anew niche, accompanied by an increase insystem complexity, might well be signaledby <strong>the</strong> disappearance <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> characteristics<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> habitat that have beenrendered irrelevant in <strong>the</strong> new effectiveenvironment. In short, a new niche mayreplace previous multiplicity <strong>and</strong> diversitywith a larger but relatively morehomogeneous cultural organization (comparedwith <strong>the</strong> prior system) that isassociated with a considerable shift ineffective environment. (Binford 2001 :203)Evaluation <strong>of</strong> ethnographic cases led to <strong>the</strong>generalization thatThere does not appear to be a 'selfdefining'constant structuring <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> persons included in hunter-ga<strong>the</strong>rerregional units, dialect groups, or ethnicunits. The data reveal that large-scale,collective human groups co-vary in sizewith environmental variables. Large-scalemacro units are presumably selectivelyconditioned, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong>ycan be thought <strong>of</strong> as system state indicatorsis also variable. (Binford 2001:225,generalization 7.18)Micro-group Units. Binford recognized thatdepending on <strong>the</strong> system state condition, variablesfound in one setting may interact in different ways soas to produce ei<strong>the</strong>r similar or different organizationalproperties among <strong>the</strong>se cases. To better underst<strong>and</strong>how <strong>the</strong>se differences arose, Binford shifted analyticalscales to see if he could identify a self-defining constant.In <strong>the</strong> ethnographic database, <strong>the</strong>re is a considerablerange in dispersed residential groups, orgroup 1, household size per 100 km 2 for thosepracticing different subsistence strategies, as follows(Binford 2001:346):mounted huntersagriculturalistsmutualistsegalitarian groups, noinstitutionalized leadersegalitarian groups, withinstitutionalized ieadersranked societies, no elite leadersranked societies, with elite leaders3.6929.6023.9713.1514.8046.7451.08Among plant-ga<strong>the</strong>rers, group 1 size varies withaboveground productivity. People who depend totallyonterrestrial plants tend to be foragers with residentialmobility. They have small group 1 units inhabitats with low primary productivity. For animalcollectors,foods were acquired at some distance from<strong>the</strong> residential camp <strong>and</strong> transported back. The residentialgroups tended to be large. They have largergroup 1 sizes in low primary production settings. Ina cool, temperate setting <strong>and</strong> all warmer settings,people who depend on terrestrial animal resources areorganized in terms <strong>of</strong> forager strategies withresidential mobility. Two thresholds would affectsubsistence strategies (Table 11.1). Between <strong>the</strong>Arctic <strong>and</strong> Equatorial zones, where ei<strong>the</strong>r hunting orga<strong>the</strong>ring would be exclusive subsistence patterns,<strong>the</strong>re is a mix in <strong>the</strong> dependence on ei <strong>the</strong>r strategy. Atan effective temperature (E.T.) value <strong>of</strong> 12.75degrees, <strong>the</strong> growing season is such that plantdominantsubsistence patterns end. Toward <strong>the</strong> upperend <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> warm temperate zone, at an E. T. value <strong>of</strong>15.25 degrees <strong>and</strong> 35 degrees latitude, <strong>the</strong> need forstorage becomes part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsistence strategy, butstorage is also found in <strong>the</strong> archaeological <strong>and</strong> ethnographicrecord where higher E.T. values are calculated.In <strong>the</strong>se instances, storage is one <strong>of</strong> severalstrategies that can be adopted when groups need tointensify <strong>the</strong>ir food-production levels. This variable,<strong>the</strong>refore, is correlated both with environment <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r variables that suggest intensification. Above <strong>the</strong>storage threshold, <strong>the</strong> dependence on stored foods was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!