13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environment <strong>and</strong> Natural Resources 37R. Powers et al. (1983:8-9, 288-290) used datafrom <strong>the</strong> Soil Conservation Service <strong>and</strong> by Maker,Bullock, <strong>and</strong> Anderson (1974) to examine six l<strong>and</strong>classes in <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> <strong>Basin</strong>. Although <strong>the</strong> areascovered by a single l<strong>and</strong> class were <strong>of</strong>ten larger than<strong>the</strong> area probably farmed during <strong>the</strong> Pueblo adaptation,<strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> in <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> fell into classes 3 <strong>and</strong>4, which were thought to be moderately to severelylimited for irrigation. Class 1 <strong>and</strong> class 2 l<strong>and</strong>sexisted around <strong>the</strong> perimeter; e.g., in <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong>Valley, <strong>the</strong> Chuska Valley, <strong>and</strong> drainages around <strong>the</strong>north <strong>and</strong> south perimeters <strong>of</strong> Lobo Mesa. Powers etal. (1983:289) recognized that <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-class ratingsdefined only general differences <strong>and</strong> that variability inprecipitation may have been more important than soil<strong>and</strong> hydrological factors in determining <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong>an structures in <strong>the</strong>ir study sample. Theonly <strong>Chaco</strong>an structures not located on class 1 or class2 soils were in <strong>the</strong> canyon <strong>and</strong> Kin Bineola. Both <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se locations have evidence for water controlfeatures (Lyons, Inglis, <strong>and</strong> Hitchcock 1972; Lyons,Hitchcock, <strong>and</strong> Pouls 1976; Gwinn Vivian 1974b,1990).FloraBr<strong>and</strong> (1937c:46-47) characterized <strong>the</strong> canyonfloor as a Great <strong>Basin</strong> microphyll desert. During <strong>the</strong>1930s, sparse vegetation near site Bc 50 consisted <strong>of</strong>"chico or black greasewood (Sarcobatus venniculatus),tumble weed or Russian thistle (Salsola pestijer),crownbeard or smelling sunflower (Verbesinaenceliodes exauriculata), <strong>and</strong> scattered grasses.Herbaceous forms dominate; <strong>the</strong>re is no tree growth;<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> chico is <strong>the</strong> only shrub in <strong>the</strong> immediate area"(Br<strong>and</strong> 1937c:39). On <strong>the</strong> alluvial flats, sagebrush(Artemisia) was <strong>the</strong> dominant shrub; but greasewood(Sarcobatus vermiculatus) , bunch grasses(Sporobolus), rubberweed (Hymenoxys), tumble weed(Salsola pestijer), salt bushes (Atriplex), rabbit brush(Chrysothamnus) , blue grama (Bouteloua gracilus),galleta grass (Hilaria jamesii), fea<strong>the</strong>r grass (Stipa),poverty grass (Aristida), crownbeard (Verbesina), <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>rs were present. Yuccas <strong>and</strong> cacti were found ontalus slopes, rocky ledges, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r mesa <strong>and</strong> valleysurfaces. On s<strong>and</strong>stone ridges <strong>and</strong> mesas wereJuniperus (also known as cedars), pinon (Pinusedulis), <strong>and</strong> sagebrush (Artemisia). Steppe grassesappeared in parklike openings in <strong>the</strong>se settings. Invegetated areas between <strong>the</strong> mesa levels weresagebrush, rubberweed, blue grama grass, pricklypear, <strong>and</strong> cane cacti (Opuntia). Joint fir (Ephedra)<strong>and</strong> redtop grass (Agrostis) were found in very s<strong>and</strong>ysoils; around ponds <strong>and</strong> lakes in <strong>the</strong> area are foundcarrizo (Phragmites phragmites), rushes (Juncus) ,bullrushes (Scripus), <strong>and</strong> sedges (Carex).Br<strong>and</strong> (1937c:53-55) identified species that wereused for food, medicine, dyes, fibers, matting, <strong>and</strong>baskets. Later, Elmore (1943) conducted ethnobotanicalstudies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Navajo <strong>and</strong> began collectionsfor a herbarium. By 1965, Gordon Vivian <strong>and</strong>Ma<strong>the</strong>ws (1965:23-24) were able to exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>description <strong>of</strong> available flora. Although <strong>the</strong>re is nogreat abundance or wide diversification <strong>of</strong> plants, <strong>the</strong>vegetation was characterized as predominantly UpperSonoran with some remnants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Transitional inmore sheltered coves, <strong>and</strong> re-entrants. They listedspecies by <strong>the</strong> general areas in which <strong>the</strong>y were found(canyon floor, exposed soils at outwashes from fromside entrants, <strong>and</strong> at junctures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>and</strong>Escavada, arroyo bottom, mesa tops, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r higherelevations). Vivian <strong>and</strong> Ma<strong>the</strong>ws (1965) recognizedthat <strong>the</strong> lists were incomplete, especially for higher<strong>and</strong> more remote areas on Chacra Mesa. It was <strong>the</strong>irimpression that erosion control measures taken during<strong>the</strong> 1930s resulted in an increase <strong>of</strong> black greasewood<strong>and</strong> larger shrubs on <strong>the</strong> canyon bottom. It was in <strong>the</strong>intermediate zone between <strong>the</strong> mesa tops <strong>and</strong> canyonfloor, however, that <strong>the</strong>y noted <strong>the</strong> greatest variationin vegetation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> largest number <strong>of</strong> species.By 1969, <strong>the</strong> wash contained a few trees plantedduring an erosion control program; today, <strong>the</strong>re issome natural recivitment. Species introduced by <strong>the</strong>Soil Conservation Service during a three-year period(1933 to 1936) include tamarisk (Tamarix); willow(Salix); broad leaf cottonwood (Populus wislizeni);narrow leaf cottonwood (P. angustijolia); wild plum(Prunus americana); Parosela shrubs; western wheatgrass, or bluestem (Argopyron smithii); sacaton (Sporobolus);<strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong> bunchgrass (Oryzopsis hymenoides)(Br<strong>and</strong>1937c:47 Footnote 12; Gordon Vivian<strong>and</strong> Ma<strong>the</strong>ws 1965:5). Relict st<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> pine trees <strong>and</strong>a few Douglas-firs existed along Chacra Mesa. In <strong>the</strong>central canyon, relict individual Pinus ponderosa werecut down for firewood. In <strong>the</strong> 1990s, Windes (personalcommunication, 2003) noted a few individualsupcanyon near <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> East community. Healthypopulations are found in higher elevations, toward

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!