13.07.2015 Views

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

Culture and Ecology of Chaco Canyon and the San Juan Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

258 <strong>Chaco</strong> Project Syn<strong>the</strong>sisfunctioned nei<strong>the</strong>r as a transportation nor a productioncommunity (Marshall et al. 1979), but may have hada special cooperative function within <strong>the</strong> system.Marshall <strong>and</strong> Doyel (1981: 73 -75) proposed <strong>the</strong>"<strong>Chaco</strong> halo" model to explain <strong>the</strong> interrelationshipsbetween <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> <strong>and</strong> neighboring areas. Thearea included in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> halo is oval-shaped, with<strong>the</strong> greatest distance east to west (Doyel et al. 1984:Figure 7). It includes <strong>the</strong> lower Escavada drainage on<strong>the</strong> north, where Greasy Hill, <strong>the</strong> Escavada complex,Kin Indian ruin, <strong>and</strong> Kimbeto Point sites are articulatedto <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn road system. To <strong>the</strong> west along<strong>the</strong> lower Kin Klizhin drainage are three areas locatedalong road systems: <strong>the</strong> Padilla Well complex; <strong>the</strong>earlier Casa del Rio mound; <strong>and</strong> Kin Klizhin, with itstower kiva. To <strong>the</strong> south are Upper Kin Klizhin,Greenlee ruin, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chacra Face-Fajada Washcommunities-all established along early road alignments.To <strong>the</strong> east, a road along <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>canyon was postulated to link Wijiji <strong>and</strong> PuebloPintado to <strong>the</strong> canyon. Thus, <strong>the</strong> halo (Figure 8.6)would include sites with different functions, all <strong>of</strong>which would provide support for <strong>the</strong> canyon. Itwould include ancestral communities that had beenestablished as early as Basketmaker III in areas withgood agricultural l<strong>and</strong>s. During <strong>the</strong> Late Bonitophase, a period with good precipitation levels, scioncommunities arose in areas with less agriculturalpotential; <strong>the</strong>y were usually smaller <strong>and</strong> lacked typicalfeatures such as great kivas. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se communitiesmay have been used by popUlations thatdispersed throughout <strong>the</strong> area on a seasonal basis.They may have been tied to different centers within<strong>the</strong> canyon, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> could have been aregional capital composed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> representative centers<strong>of</strong> outlying districts.O<strong>the</strong>r components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional system wouldinclude settlements from 1) <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> area, whereaquatic <strong>and</strong> riverine associated resources would beavailable; 2) <strong>the</strong> Chuska slope, where <strong>the</strong>re is a readysupply <strong>of</strong> construction timbers, lithic materials (e.g.,Narbona Pass chert <strong>and</strong> trachyte temper), <strong>and</strong> clays;<strong>and</strong> 3) <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Cibola district, where l<strong>and</strong> suitablefor agriculture <strong>and</strong> an upl<strong>and</strong> pinon-juniper resourcearea were located. Because <strong>the</strong> resources were dispersed,<strong>the</strong>re would be a need for redistribution <strong>of</strong>materials (Doyel 1981). This system, however, wasfragile <strong>and</strong> depended on cooperation from all members.Depending on <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>and</strong> type <strong>of</strong> environmentalstress, centers could wax <strong>and</strong> wane. <strong>Chaco</strong>developed as <strong>the</strong> regional capital because it was at acrossroad within this system that included differentethnic, geographical, <strong>and</strong> environmental boundaries(Doyel 1981).Salmon RuinFrom 1972 through 1978, Cynthia Irwin­Williams (1972; Irwin-Williams <strong>and</strong> Shelley 1980)adopted a general systems model <strong>and</strong> used data fromarchaeology <strong>and</strong> ethnology to test several hypo<strong>the</strong>sesabout <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong>an adaptation at <strong>the</strong> Salmon ruinlocated just west <strong>of</strong> Bloomfield, New Mexico. Toidentify o<strong>the</strong>r local communities <strong>and</strong> to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>relationships between <strong>the</strong> building at Salmon ruin <strong>and</strong>its later occupants, a survey <strong>of</strong> 3,000 km 2 (1,200 m?)was initiated (Whaley <strong>and</strong> Yingst 1978). The initialworking hypo<strong>the</strong>sis was that <strong>the</strong>re were distinct butculturally related popUlations in <strong>the</strong> Animas, <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong>,<strong>and</strong> La Plata valleys. Although very little informationfrom <strong>the</strong> site survey was published, Irwin-Williams(1980b:part 12) indicated that 150 sites were recorded.Included were two large great houses (Aztec <strong>and</strong>Salmon), plus approximately 12 smaller <strong>Chaco</strong>anstructures (Irwin-Williams 1980a:part 1:6).All known <strong>Chaco</strong> structures were located at ornear <strong>the</strong> confluence <strong>of</strong> a medium-size tributary with<strong>the</strong> river valley, much like <strong>the</strong> earliest great houses in<strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> (Irwin-Williams 1980b: 146). TwinAngels Pueblo, a site that was definitely roadassociated,was <strong>the</strong> only exception. Some local smallhouse sites were similarly located at tributary confluences,but some also appeared away from suchlocations. At <strong>the</strong> larger <strong>Chaco</strong>an outliers (Salmonruin, Aztec ruin, Jacquez, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sterling site), <strong>the</strong>new buildings were thought to represent a considerablepopUlation increase in an already-inhabitedenvironment.Prior to A.D. 1050, <strong>the</strong>re were a small number<strong>of</strong> <strong>Chaco</strong>an sites in <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> area. Bice (1983)documents architectural features at <strong>the</strong> Sterling ruin,located on <strong>the</strong> south side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Juan</strong> River nearFarmington. It has an early <strong>Chaco</strong> masonry style(type I), as well as later construction <strong>and</strong> habitation bypeople with <strong>Chaco</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mesa Verde ceramic types.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!