10.12.2015 Views

Postharvest Biology and Technology of Fruits, Vegetables, and Flowers

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ETHYLENE PERCEPTION AND GENE EXPRESSION 135<br />

Fig. 6.4 Comparison <strong>of</strong> the flower longevity in Nemesia—wild type (left) <strong>and</strong> a transformant (right). The flower<br />

<strong>of</strong> the transgenic plant lasted longer than that <strong>of</strong> the wild-type plant; as a result, more flowers bloomed on the<br />

transgenic plant, simultaneously. The numbers indicate the flower positions in wild-type <strong>and</strong> transgenic Nemesia<br />

inflorescence.<br />

ethylene-insensitive Petunia using a mutated ers homolog from Brassica oleracea (boers).<br />

Similar to etr1-1, boers codes for an ethylene receptor with a nonfunctional sensor domain<br />

that is not able to bind ethylene. The transgenic petunia plants were insensitive to ethylene,<br />

<strong>and</strong> produced flowers that were larger <strong>and</strong> had a longer vase life than those from nontransformed<br />

plants. However, the transformed plants had a higher mortality, due to a higher<br />

susceptibility to fungal diseases.<br />

Recently, flower longevity in transgenic plants <strong>of</strong> an ethylene-sensitive ornamental plant,<br />

Nemesia strumosa, was established by introducing the mutated melon ethylene receptor<br />

gene Cm-ETR1/H69A (Cui et al., 2004; Takada et al., 2005). Based on the mutation in<br />

Arabidopsis etr1-1, the mis-sense mutation His-69 to Ala (H69A) was introduced into Cm-<br />

ETR1 to create the mutant gene Cm-ETR1/H69A. The Cm-ETR1/H69A expression inhibited<br />

the ethylene response during the senescence <strong>of</strong> Nemesia flowers, resulting in longer shelf<br />

life (Fig. 6.4). This technique can be useful in delaying flower senescence in heterologous<br />

plants.<br />

6.6 Conclusions<br />

The case studies discussed in this chapter indicate that a substantial amount <strong>of</strong> research has<br />

been carried out on ethylene perception in fruits, vegetables, <strong>and</strong> flowers. The differences<br />

in ethylene response <strong>and</strong>/or differential gene expression observed during fruit ripening or<br />

flower senescence might reflect receptor function or interplay at these stages <strong>of</strong> development.<br />

The biological explanation <strong>and</strong>/or the significance <strong>of</strong> the multiplicity <strong>of</strong> ethylene receptors<br />

in plants are currently unknown, but it may be that individual receptors maintain a distinct

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!