10.12.2015 Views

Postharvest Biology and Technology of Fruits, Vegetables, and Flowers

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Average fresh weight (g)<br />

(a)<br />

Positive a* color value<br />

(b)<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Whole fruit fresh weight<br />

10-3-B 10-6-C 8-2-E<br />

Fruit color (“redness”)<br />

10-3-B 10-6-C 8-2-E<br />

WT<br />

WT<br />

25<br />

Whole fruit firmness (compression test)<br />

20<br />

Force (N)<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

(c)<br />

0<br />

10-3-B 10-6-C 8-2-E<br />

“Rutgers” tomato line<br />

Fig. 9.20 Mean fresh weight (a), a* (red) color value (b), <strong>and</strong> firmness (c) <strong>of</strong> whole fruit from wild-type (WT)<br />

<strong>and</strong> three LePLDα2 antisense lines harvested 7 days after the breaker stage. Error bars indicate SEM, with n ≥ 60<br />

for (a) <strong>and</strong> (c), <strong>and</strong> ≥30 for (b). Red color evaluation was based on CIE a* values (three equatorial measurements<br />

per fruit) obtained with a Minolta CR-300 colorimeter. Firmness was determined by flat plate compression <strong>of</strong><br />

whole fruit at 2 mm/s to a depth <strong>of</strong> 5 mm performed at three equatorial sites using a Stable Microsystems Texture<br />

Analyzer (Surrey, Engl<strong>and</strong>, United Kingdom).<br />

WT<br />

232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!