10.12.2015 Views

Postharvest Biology and Technology of Fruits, Vegetables, and Flowers

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PHOSPHOLIPASE D, MEMBRANE DETERIORATION, AND SENESCENCE 213<br />

<strong>and</strong> reverse primers were generated to conduct 3 ′ <strong>and</strong> 5 ′ rapid amplification <strong>of</strong> cDNA ends<br />

(RACE) using the 883-bp fragment, <strong>and</strong> a 2,430-bp full-length cDNA was isolated encoding<br />

a PLD alpha 809 amino acids long (LePLDα1).<br />

In contrast with LePLDα1, the second tomato PLD alpha isogene, LePLDα2<br />

(AF154425), was cloned by probing a fruit cDNA library (Smith et al., 1998) with a 1.6-<br />

kb fragment <strong>of</strong> the open reading frame (ORF) from the castor bean PLD alpha cDNA,<br />

L33686 (detailed in Whitaker et al., 2001). Ten <strong>of</strong> 11 positive clones were from the same<br />

gene, <strong>and</strong> the longest <strong>of</strong> these was selected for sequencing. The complete cDNA was 2,863<br />

nucleotides long, including a 2,424-bp ORF encoding a PLD alpha 807 amino acids in<br />

length (LePLDα2). The complete cDNA <strong>of</strong> a third tomato PLD alpha isogene, LePLDα3<br />

(AY013253), was cloned during the course <strong>of</strong> a study examining PLD gene expression patterns<br />

in tomato plants infected with a fungal pathogen or challenged with a fungal elicitor<br />

(Laxalt et al., 2001). A total <strong>of</strong> five tomato PLD cDNAs was isolated, including three PLD<br />

alphas <strong>and</strong> two betas, using degenerate primers <strong>and</strong> cDNA generated from root plus stem<br />

tissue RNA, or by probing a cDNA library produced using RNA from Fusarium-infected<br />

root plus stem tissue. Among the five PLD clones were a full-length PLD alpha cDNA,<br />

AY013252, nearly identical to LePLDα1 (AF201661), <strong>and</strong> a partial PLD alpha cDNA,<br />

AY013254, which represents the same gene as LePLDα2 (AF154425). Northern blot analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> PLD alpha transcript levels in various tissues indicated that LePLDα2 <strong>and</strong> LePLDα3<br />

are most abundantly expressed in flowers > fruit, <strong>and</strong> that levels <strong>of</strong> LePLDα2 <strong>and</strong> LePLDα3<br />

mRNA increase through the orange stage <strong>of</strong> fruit ripening, remaining high in red ripe fruit.<br />

In contrast, LePLDα1 transcript was most abundant in immature green fruit, <strong>and</strong> levels declined<br />

thereafter in ripening fruit. Whitaker et al. (2001) performed isogene-specific DNA<br />

<strong>and</strong> RNA gel blot analyses <strong>of</strong> LePLDα2 in “Rutgers” tomato plants using a radiolabeled<br />

probe PCR amplified from the 3 ′ -untranslated region (3 ′ -UTR) <strong>of</strong> the cDNA. LePLDα2 was<br />

shown to be a single copy gene that, as determined by Laxalt et al. (2001), is most abundantly<br />

expressed in floral <strong>and</strong> fruit pericarp tissues (Fig. 9.10). The abundance <strong>of</strong> LePLDα2<br />

transcript increased throughout fruit development from 10 days postanthesis, reaching a<br />

maximum at the pink/orange stage <strong>of</strong> ripening (Fig. 9.10a). A cDNA encoding LePLDα3<br />

←−<br />

Fig. 9.10 (a) Abundance <strong>of</strong> LePLDα2 transcript in “Rutgers” tomato fruit pericarp <strong>and</strong> locular tissues over the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> development <strong>and</strong> ripening (i) <strong>and</strong> in floral <strong>and</strong> vegetative tissues (ii). Total RNA was isolated from fruit<br />

at 10, 20, 30, 35, <strong>and</strong> 40 days postanthesis <strong>and</strong> at the breaker (BK), turning (TN), pink (PK), red ripe (RR), <strong>and</strong><br />

overripe (OR) stages <strong>of</strong> ripening, as well as from stem, leaf, root, <strong>and</strong> flower tissues. About 20 μg per lane was run<br />

on 3% agarose gels <strong>and</strong> probed with a 3 ′ -UTR fragment <strong>of</strong> the LePLDα2 cDNA. The blots were then stripped <strong>and</strong><br />

hybridized with a soybean 26S DNA probe to evaluate loading <strong>of</strong> total RNA (as indicated by levels <strong>of</strong> tomato 27S<br />

rRNA). Bar graph above shows the ratio <strong>of</strong> LePLDα2 mRNA to rRNA (×100) derived from densitometry scans <strong>of</strong><br />

the autoradiograph b<strong>and</strong>s. (b) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis <strong>of</strong> LePLDα3 transcript levels in (i) pericarp tissue<br />

<strong>of</strong> wild-type (WT) “Rutgers” fruit during development <strong>and</strong> ripening; (ii) other WT plant organs including roots<br />

(R), stems (S), leaves (L), <strong>and</strong> flowers (F); <strong>and</strong> (iii) pericarp tissue <strong>of</strong> fruit from LePLDα2 antisense lines (10-6-C,<br />

10-5-C, 10-3-B, 8-2-E) harvested 40 days after pollination, as well as WT harvested at the mature green (MG),<br />

breaker (BK), <strong>and</strong> pink (PK) stages. Isogene-specific primers were used to generate the 0.6-kb fragment corresponding<br />

to nucleotides 333–908 <strong>of</strong> the LePLDα3 coding region. The QuantumRNA quantitative RT-PCR kit<br />

(Ambion) was used to determine levels <strong>of</strong> LePLDα3 cDNA relative to the control 18S cDNA. Ethidium bromidestained<br />

gels <strong>of</strong> the RT-PCR products were used for quantification <strong>of</strong> the amplified LePLDα3 <strong>and</strong> 18S cDNA<br />

fragments by densitometry. The left lane in each image shows the location <strong>of</strong> a 0.5-kb DNA marker. Developmental<br />

stages in (i) were 10, 20, <strong>and</strong> 30 days after pollination, mature green (MG), breaker (BK), turning (TN), pink<br />

(PK), <strong>and</strong> red ripe (RR). (Reproduced with permission from Whitaker et al., 2001.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!