10.12.2015 Views

Postharvest Biology and Technology of Fruits, Vegetables, and Flowers

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

254 POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY & TECHNOLOGY OF FRUITS, VEGETABLES, & FLOWERS<br />

Table 11.2 Response <strong>of</strong> fruits to various exposure times <strong>and</strong> temperatures with respect to phytotoxic effects<br />

<strong>and</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong> ripening such as s<strong>of</strong>tening, skin color changes, sugar, <strong>and</strong> acidity<br />

Phytotoxic<br />

Fruit Method a Time Temperature ( ◦ C) symptoms S<strong>of</strong>tening Color<br />

Apples HA 96 h 38 N Firmer Increased<br />

HA 96 h 43 Y Firmer Increased<br />

Oroblanco citrus HA 4 h 46 N S<strong>of</strong>ter Increased<br />

HA 4 h 47 Y S<strong>of</strong>ter Increased<br />

Mango VH 15 min 46 N No effect No effect<br />

VH 30 min 46 N S<strong>of</strong>ter Increased<br />

VH 30 min 47 Y S<strong>of</strong>ter Increased<br />

Lurie (unpublished).<br />

a HA, hot air; VH, vapor heat.<br />

(Ortega-Zaleta <strong>and</strong> Yahia, 2000). This is true <strong>of</strong> other fruits as well (Table 11.2). Hot water<br />

treatments can also result in damage to the epidermis <strong>of</strong> the commodity. Red ginger flowers<br />

heated in water at 49 ◦ C for 12–15 min had some damage to the inner bracts that resulted in<br />

necrotic tissue (Hara et al., 1996). The authors also found that hot water treatment caused an<br />

intensification <strong>of</strong> mechanical injury in flowers, emphasizing the importance <strong>of</strong> careful h<strong>and</strong>ling<br />

<strong>of</strong> materials destined for heat treatment. Surface browning <strong>of</strong> peaches exposed to hot<br />

water treatments increased with both time (1.5–5 min) <strong>and</strong> temperature (50–55 ◦ C) (Phillips<br />

<strong>and</strong> Austin, 1982). Fruit differed in susceptibility because <strong>of</strong> seasonal <strong>and</strong> maturity effects.<br />

Many researchers have shown that heating in moist forced air was less damaging to<br />

the fruit than heating in hot water or vapor-heated air. Shellie <strong>and</strong> Mangan (2000) closely<br />

monitored fruit surface temperatures during heating with hot water, moist forced air, <strong>and</strong><br />

water vapor-saturated air (vapor forced air) (Fig. 11.7). The temperature <strong>of</strong> the fruit surface<br />

varied according to the heating medium used. Fruit surface temperature was coolest when<br />

heated with moist forced air <strong>and</strong> reached only 81% <strong>of</strong> the temperature <strong>of</strong> the heating medium<br />

after 5 min <strong>of</strong> exposure. The surface <strong>of</strong> the fruit heated with vapor-saturated air or hot water<br />

reached 96% <strong>of</strong> the temperature <strong>of</strong> the heating medium within 5 min. During heating with<br />

vapor-saturated air, the surface temperature <strong>of</strong> the fruit exceeded the air temperature after<br />

about 20 min <strong>of</strong> heating <strong>and</strong> remained 1 ◦ C higher, while the surface temperature <strong>of</strong> fruit<br />

Temperature (C)<br />

50<br />

49<br />

48<br />

47<br />

46<br />

45<br />

44<br />

43<br />

42<br />

41<br />

40<br />

0<br />

50 100<br />

Surface-HAT<br />

Below surface-HAT<br />

Surface-VH<br />

Below surface-VH<br />

Surface-HW<br />

Below surface-HW<br />

Time (min)<br />

Fig. 11.7 Rate <strong>of</strong> heating <strong>of</strong> fruit at surface <strong>of</strong> 2 mm below the surface when heated in 48 ◦ C moist, forced-air<br />

treatment (HAT), vapor-saturated, forced air (VH), or hot water (HW).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!