130925-studie-wildlife-comeback-in-europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Rank Reason for change Description<br />
1 Legislation Legal protection first started <strong>in</strong> Sweden <strong>in</strong> 1969 and<br />
was gradually established <strong>in</strong> Norway between 1973<br />
and 1983 [8, 29] .<br />
2 Species management –<br />
Compensation schemes<br />
3 Other – Natural<br />
recolonisation<br />
Table 3.<br />
Major reasons for<br />
positive change <strong>in</strong><br />
the status of the<br />
Wolver<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />
A compensation scheme pay<strong>in</strong>g for reproductions<br />
of Wolver<strong>in</strong>es has been <strong>in</strong>strumental <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
of and expansion of the species <strong>in</strong> Sweden [30] .<br />
Through population <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong>itiated by legal<br />
protection, the species was able to spread naturally<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the forested landscapes <strong>in</strong> Sweden from which<br />
it had been extirpated [28] .<br />
to other areas [30] . In addition, direct compensation<br />
is <strong>in</strong> place for depredation events [32] .<br />
The situation is, however, very different <strong>in</strong><br />
Sweden; no hunt<strong>in</strong>g is permitted, and although<br />
lethal control has been carried out <strong>in</strong> special<br />
cases as a f<strong>in</strong>al conflict-mitigat<strong>in</strong>g measure, it<br />
is believed to be of limited importance at the<br />
population level [5] . In re<strong>in</strong>deer husbandry areas, a<br />
conservation performance payment system us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a positive re<strong>in</strong>forcement approach was implemented<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1996 [32] . Under this system, 200,000<br />
Swedish Kronor are paid to re<strong>in</strong>deer herd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
districts for each documented Wolver<strong>in</strong>e reproduction<br />
irrespective of predation level, both to<br />
cover the costs of depredation and disturbance,<br />
and to encourage herders to take actions that<br />
decrease losses [33] . While this has not prevented<br />
illegal kill<strong>in</strong>gs (poach<strong>in</strong>g is the ma<strong>in</strong> source of<br />
mortality [5] ), adult females have lower mortality,<br />
which leads to a reproduction rate which is twice<br />
as high as <strong>in</strong> similar habitat <strong>in</strong> Norway [30] . The<br />
scheme is believed to have been <strong>in</strong>strumental <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> population size of 3.8% per year and<br />
the concurrent expansion s<strong>in</strong>ce its <strong>in</strong>troduction [30] .<br />
However, it is not known whether acceptance<br />
among those affected has actually <strong>in</strong>creased or<br />
whether it is the associated extensive monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
needed to verify reproductions that is act<strong>in</strong>g as a<br />
poach<strong>in</strong>g deterrent [30] .<br />
Recent developments<br />
The Scand<strong>in</strong>avian Wolver<strong>in</strong>e population appears<br />
to be stable at present [12] and a cont<strong>in</strong>uous range<br />
across Sweden and Norway [27, 28] has been created<br />
through natural spread. Highly cooperative<br />
projects have been on-go<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1990s <strong>in</strong><br />
Sweden [20] and Norway [18] , and large-scale research<br />
is now also be<strong>in</strong>g undertaken <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land [21] .<br />
However, the high level of cull<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some areas of<br />
124