Figure 3. Map of recent developments recorded for the Harbour seal <strong>in</strong> Europe. Expansion Persistence Contraction S jB jB d ¿ jB jB B Habitat degradation/ change S Legal protection d Accidental mortality À Population <strong>in</strong>crease i New sight<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong> river tributary) → Further range expansion i Recent developments There have been a number of mass mortality events <strong>in</strong> European seals <strong>in</strong> the past [12, 36] , and disease [44] and high levels of pollution [45] cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be a problem. For example, over 900 seals, many of them juveniles, were left dead on the Schleswig-Holste<strong>in</strong> coast <strong>in</strong> 2010 due to a suspected nematode <strong>in</strong>festation [46] . In addition, widespread high concentrations of organochloride compounds from contam<strong>in</strong>ated prey have been identified <strong>in</strong> a number of seal populations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Baltic area and Swedish coast [47] , the Dutch coast [48] , German Wadden Sea [49] and Brita<strong>in</strong> [50] . These contam<strong>in</strong>ants are released <strong>in</strong> the seal’s body when fat reserves are mobilised and have been shown to affect reproductive success [10, 47] . Conflict with fisheries, and associated cull<strong>in</strong>g and by-catch mortality, are also sizeable threats to the species. In addition, human disturbance is an issue; it has been shown, for example, that human presence at haul-out sites has a detrimental effect on seal behaviour [51] . There are also concerns over the genetic diversity of the species <strong>in</strong> Europe due to bottlenecks and the result<strong>in</strong>g fragmentation of populations, with some populations show<strong>in</strong>g low effective population size, such as <strong>in</strong> Svalbard [52] . Recently, an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of seal carcasses has been found <strong>in</strong> England (Norfolk), Scotland and Northern Ireland [53] exhibit<strong>in</strong>g so called corkscrew lacerations [23, 53] . The result<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle smooth-edged cut start<strong>in</strong>g at the head and spirall<strong>in</strong>g down the body (sk<strong>in</strong> and blubber are often detached from the underly<strong>in</strong>g tissue) [23] is consistent with seals be<strong>in</strong>g drawn through a ducted propeller [23, 53] . In total, over 65 grey and harbour seals of all age classes and sexes have been recovered [23] . While this level of mortality is negligible <strong>in</strong> large populations, it may well exacerbate decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> smaller populations [23] . For example, it is considered a significant cause of mortality <strong>in</strong> the Firth of Tay [53] . In addition, the species may be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly driven from sites through developments <strong>in</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e renewables such as costal and off-shore w<strong>in</strong>d farms, as has been observed at Scroby Sands (UK) [54] . However, there are also positive developments for the Harbour seal. In Scotland, the outdated Conservation of Seals Act 1970 was replaced with the Mar<strong>in</strong>e (Scotland) Act 2010 (Part 6) [27] . This Act <strong>in</strong>creases protection, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a new offence of harassment at designated haul-out sites. Although shoot<strong>in</strong>g of seals for the protection of fisheries is still permitted, it is regulated by licence and there are specific limits on numbers that may be taken <strong>in</strong> each of seven Seal Management Areas around Scotland [27] . Plans by the Scottish government to protect coastal sites used by only half the nation’s seals have been widely criticised [55] , but may represent an important first step. In Germany, counts of Harbour seals on the Niedersachsen coast revealed the largest population size s<strong>in</strong>ce records began <strong>in</strong> 1958, with a total number of over 6,600 <strong>in</strong>dividuals [56] . Overall, the number of seals <strong>in</strong> the Wadden Sea reached over 21,600 <strong>in</strong> 2009 [57] and grew to over 24,100 <strong>in</strong> 2011 [13] . There are also records of the species spread<strong>in</strong>g further south, and <strong>in</strong>to large rivers. One <strong>in</strong>dividual was sighted 200 km <strong>in</strong>land <strong>in</strong> the Dordogne river <strong>in</strong> southwest France [58] . 138
References 1. IUCN 2011a. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2011.1:Available from: http://www. iucnredlist.org/. 2. Reijnders, P., Brasseur, S., van der Toorn, J., et al. 1993. Seals, fur seals, sea lions, and walrus: Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Seal Specialist Group. Cambridge, U.K. 3. Special Committee on Seals (SCOS) 2010. Scientific Advice on Matters Related to the Management of Seal Populations 2010. 4. Härkönen, T. 1987. Seasonal and regional variations <strong>in</strong> the feed<strong>in</strong>g habits of the harbour seal, Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>in</strong> the Skagerrak and the Kattegat. Journal of Zoology, 213: 535–543. 5. Reijnders, P.J.H. 1978. Recruitment <strong>in</strong> the harbour seal Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a population <strong>in</strong> the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 12: 164–179. 6. Härkönen, T., Hård<strong>in</strong>g, K.C. & Lunneryd, S.G. 2001. Age- and sex-specific behaviour <strong>in</strong> harbour seals Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a leads to biased estimates of vital population parameters. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36 7. Goodman, S.J. 1998. Patterns of extensive genetic differentiation and variation among European Harbor seals (Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a vitul<strong>in</strong>a) revealed us<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite DNA polymorphisms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15 (2): 104–118. 8. Mees, J. & Reijnders, P.J.H. 1994. The harbour seal, Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>in</strong> the Oosterschelde: decl<strong>in</strong>e and possibilities for recovery. Hydrobiologia, 282/283 9. Reijnders, P.J.H. 1992. Retrospective analysis and related future management perspectives for the harbour seal (Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a) <strong>in</strong> the Wadden Sea, <strong>in</strong> Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 7th International Wadden Sea Symposium, Ameland, The Netherlands, 22–26 Oct 1990, N. Dankers, C.J. Smit, and M. Scholl, Editors., Netherlands Institute for Sea Research: 193–197. 10. Reijnders, P.J.H. 1986. Reproductive failure <strong>in</strong> common seals feed<strong>in</strong>g on fish from polluted coastal waters. Nature, 324: 456–457. 11. Dietz, R., Heide-Jørgensen, M.-P. & Härkönen, T. 1989. Mass deaths of Harbor seals (Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a) In Europe. Ambio, 18 (5): 258–264. 12. Härkönen, T., Dietz, R., Reijnders, P., et al. 2006. The 1988 and 2002 phoc<strong>in</strong>e distemper virus epidemics <strong>in</strong> European harbour seals. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 68 (2): 115–130. 13. Trilateral Seal Expert Group 2011. Aerial surveys of Harbour Seals <strong>in</strong> the Wadden Sea <strong>in</strong> 2011. 14. IUCN 2011b. European Red List. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/<strong>in</strong>itiatives/<strong>europe</strong>/ <strong>europe</strong>an-red-list-site. 15. Council of Europe 1992. Council Directive 92/43/ EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. 16. Council of Europe 1979. Convention On The Conservation Of European Wildlife And Natural Habitats. European Treaties Series. 17. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) 2009. Appendices I and II of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). 18. Trilateral Cooperation on the Protection of the Wadden Sea 1994. M<strong>in</strong>isterial Declaration of the 7th Trilateral Governmental Conference on the Protection of the Wadden Sea. 19. Duck, C. 2013. Pers. comm. 20. Gärdenfors, U. 2005. The 2005 Red List of Swedish Species. ArtDatabanken, SLU Uppsala. 21. Kålås, J.A., Viken, Å. & Bakken, T. 2006. Norsk Rødliste 2006 – 2006 Norwegian Red List. Artsdatabanken: Norway. 22. UICN France, MNHN, SFEPM, et al. 2009. La Liste rouge des espèces menacées en France – Chapitre Mammifères de France métropolita<strong>in</strong>e. Paris, France. 23. Special Committee on Seals (SCOS) 2011. Scientific Advice on Matters Related to the Management of Seal Populations: 2011. 24. Lydersen, C. & Kovacs, K.M. 2010. Status and biology of harbour seals (Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a) <strong>in</strong> Svalbard. NAMMCO Scientific Publications, 8: 47–60. 25. UK Government 1970. Conservation of Seals Act 1970. United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. 26. UK Government 1999. The Conservation of Seals (England) Order 1999. United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. 27. Scottish Government 2010. Mar<strong>in</strong>e (Scotland) Act 2010 – Part 6 ‘Conservation of seals’ United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. 28. Northen Ireland Environment Agency 1985. Wildlife (Northern Ireland) Order 1985. United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. 29. Reijnders, P.J.H., E.H., R., N., T., et al. 1997. Population development of Harbour seals Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> the Wadden Sea after the 1988 virus epizootic. J. Sea Res., 38 (1–2): 161–168. 30. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat The Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation. Available from: http:// www.waddensea-secretariat.org/trilat/trilat. html. 31. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat 2001. Conservation and Management Plan for the Wadden Sea seal population 2002 – 2006. 32. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat 2006. Conservation and Management Plan for the Wadden Sea seal population 2007 – 2010. 33. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat 2011. Conservation and Management Plan for the Wadden Sea seal population 2012 – 2016. 34. Härkönen, T., Hard<strong>in</strong>g, K., Goodman, S.J., et al. 2005. Colonization history of the Baltic Harbour seals: <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g archeological, behavioral, and genetic data. Mar<strong>in</strong>e Mammal Science, 21 (4): 695–716. 35. Heide-Jørgensen, M.-P. & Härkönen, T. 1988. Rebuild<strong>in</strong>g seal stocks <strong>in</strong> the Kattegat-Skagerrak. Mar<strong>in</strong>e Mammal Science, 4 (3): 231–246. 36. Härkönen, T., Bäckl<strong>in</strong>, B.M., Barrett, T., et al. 2008. Mass mortality <strong>in</strong> harbour seals and harbour porpoises caused by an unknown pathogen. The Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Record, 162 (17): 555–556. 37. Boedeker, D. & D<strong>in</strong>ter, W. 2008. Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a vitul<strong>in</strong>a (LINNAEUS 1758), Common (harbour) seal (Phocidae). Available from: http://www. helcom.fi/environment2/biodiv/endangered/ Mammals/en_GB/Phoca_vitul<strong>in</strong>a_vitul<strong>in</strong>a/. 38. Viklund, K., Tidlund, A., Brenner, U., et al. 2008. Havet 2008 – om miljötillståndet i svenska havsområden. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Stockholm. 39. Stanley, H.F., Case, S., Carnahan, J.M., et al. 1996. Worldwide Patterns of Mitochondrial DNA Differentiation <strong>in</strong> the Harbor Seal (Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13 (2): 368–382. 40. Härkönen, T. 2008. Seals. HELCOM Project to produce the HELCOM thematic assessment on biodiversity and nature conservation Sixth Meet<strong>in</strong>g Hels<strong>in</strong>ki, F<strong>in</strong>land, 21–22 October 2008. Hels<strong>in</strong>ki Commission. Hels<strong>in</strong>ki. 41. van den Br<strong>in</strong>k, F.H. 1955. A field guide to the mammals of Brita<strong>in</strong> and Europe, London, UK: Coll<strong>in</strong>s & Sons. 1–221, figs, pls. 42. Scheffer, V.B. 1958. Seals, Sea Lions and Walruses. A Review of the P<strong>in</strong>nipedia, London: Oxford University Press. 43. Seal Conservation Society 2012. Harbour seal pup strand<strong>in</strong>g and rehabilitation <strong>in</strong> the southern North Sea <strong>in</strong> relation to pup production. 44. Hall, A.J., Jepson, P.D., Goodman, S.J., et al. 2006. Phoc<strong>in</strong>e distemper virus <strong>in</strong> the North and European Seas – Data and models, nature and nurture. Biological Conservation, 131: 221–229. 45. de Swart, R.L., Ross, P.S., Vos, J.G., et al. 1996. Impaired Immunity <strong>in</strong> Harbour Seals (Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a) Exposed to Bioaccumulated Environmental Contam<strong>in</strong>ants: Review of a Long-term Feed<strong>in</strong>g Study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 104 (4): 823–828. 46. Der Spiegel 2010. Forscher rätseln über massenhaftes Seehundesterben, Der Spiegel. 47. Helle, E., Olsson, M. & Jensen, S. 1976. DDT and PCB levels and reproduction <strong>in</strong> r<strong>in</strong>ged seal from the Bothnian Bay. Ambio, 5: 188–189. 48. Koeman, J.H., van de Ven, W.S., de Goeij, J.J., et al. 1975. Mercury and selenium <strong>in</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e mammals and birds. Science of the Total Environment, 3 (3): 279–287. 49. Drescher, H.E., Harms, U. & Huschenbeth, E. 1977. Organochlor<strong>in</strong>es and Heavy Metals <strong>in</strong> the Harbour Seal Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a from the German North Sea Coast. Mar<strong>in</strong>e Biology, 41: 99–106. 50. Law, R.J., Allch<strong>in</strong>, C.R. & Harwood, J. 1989. Concentrations of Organochlor<strong>in</strong>e Compounds <strong>in</strong> the Blubber of Seals from Eastern and Northeastern England, 1988. Mar<strong>in</strong>e Pollution Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 20 (3): 110–115. 51. Brasseur, S. & Fedak, M. 2003. Habitat use of Harbour seals <strong>in</strong> relation to recreation, fisheries and large <strong>in</strong>frastructural works, <strong>in</strong> Management of North Sea Harbour and Grey Seal Populations Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the International Symposium at EcoMare, Texel, The Netherlands November 29 – 30, 2002, Common Wadden Sea Secretariat: Netherlands. 52. Andersen, L., Lydersen, C., Frie, A.K., et al. 2011. A population on the edge: genetic diversity and population structure of the world’s northernmost harbour seals (Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a). Biological Journal of the L<strong>in</strong>nean Society, 102 (2): 420–439. 53. Thompson, D., Bexton, S., Brownlow, A., et al. 2010. Report on recent seal mortalities <strong>in</strong> UK waters caused by extensive lacerations. Sea Mammal Research Unit, University of St Andrews. St Andrews, Scotland. 54. Skeate, E.R., Perrow, M.R. & Gilroy, J.J. 2012. Likely effects of construction of Scroby Sands offshore w<strong>in</strong>d farm on a mixed population of harbour Phoca vitul<strong>in</strong>a and grey Halichoerus grypus seals. Mar<strong>in</strong>e Pollution Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 64: 872–881. 55. BBC 2011. Scotland’s ‘bizarre’ seal plans under fire. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ science-environment-13780738. 56. Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LAVES) 2010. Letzter Zählflug am Wochenende: Seehunden geht es im Niedersächsischen Wattenmeer so gut wie nie zuvor – höchster Bestand seit 1958. Presse<strong>in</strong>format<strong>in</strong> Nr. 20 vom 23. August 2010. 57. UNEP and Common Wadden Sea Secretariat 2010. 20 Jahre Seehundschutz im Wattenmeer: Erstes Abkommen der Bonner Konvention feiert se<strong>in</strong>en Erfolg Available from: http://www. nationalpark-wattenmeer.de/node/922. 58. Stern 2011. Seehund lässt sich <strong>in</strong> südfranzösischem Fluss nieder. Der Stern Available from: http://www.stern.de/news2/aktuell/seehundlaesst-sich-<strong>in</strong>-suedfranzoesischem-flussnieder-1673640.html. Reviewer • Callan Duck 139
- Page 1 and 2:
Stefanie Deinet Christina Ieronymid
- Page 3 and 4:
Wildlife comeback in Europe The rec
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of contents Foreword . . . .
- Page 7:
Foreword Shifting baselines In Euro
- Page 10 and 11:
The Adriatic coastline of the Veleb
- Page 12 and 13:
96 year old olive farmer with his d
- Page 14 and 15:
12
- Page 16 and 17:
Limitations of population trend dat
- Page 18 and 19:
Constructing historical distributio
- Page 20 and 21:
Red deer at the Oostvaardersplassen
- Page 22 and 23:
Table 2. Definitions of classificat
- Page 24 and 25:
22
- Page 26 and 27:
3.1. European bison Bison bonasus S
- Page 28 and 29:
Table 2. Latest population estimate
- Page 30 and 31:
Figure 1c. Map highlighting areas o
- Page 32 and 33:
Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 34 and 35:
3.2. Alpine ibex Capra ibex Summary
- Page 36 and 37:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Alpine i
- Page 38 and 39:
% change 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Fig
- Page 40 and 41:
3.3. Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica S
- Page 42 and 43:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Iberian
- Page 44 and 45:
Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 46 and 47:
3.4. Southern chamois Rupicapra pyr
- Page 48 and 49:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Southern
- Page 50 and 51:
Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 52 and 53:
3.5. Northern chamois Rupicapra rup
- Page 54 and 55:
Scale Status Population trend Justi
- Page 56 and 57:
% change 80 60 40 20 0 and Italy [2
- Page 58 and 59:
Subspecies balcanica Exploitation B
- Page 60 and 61:
3.6. Eurasian elk Alces alces Summa
- Page 62 and 63:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Eurasian
- Page 64 and 65:
Poland [10] and Estonia [28] . It i
- Page 66 and 67:
References 1. Geist, V. 1998. Deer
- Page 68 and 69:
3.7. Roe deer Capreolus capreolus S
- Page 70 and 71:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 72 and 73:
Figure 2. Change in Roe deer popula
- Page 74 and 75:
Recent developments As discussed ab
- Page 76 and 77:
3.8. Red deer Cervus elaphus Summar
- Page 78 and 79:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 80 and 81:
% change 750 600 450 300 150 0 Figu
- Page 82 and 83:
lineages for the local area and min
- Page 84 and 85:
3.9. Wild boar Sus scrofa Summary T
- Page 86 and 87:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 88 and 89:
Abundance and distribution: changes
- Page 90 and 91: References 1. IUCN 2011a. The IUCN
- Page 92 and 93: 3.10. Golden jackal Canis aureus Su
- Page 94 and 95: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 96 and 97: Recent developments Table 3. Major
- Page 98 and 99: 3.11. Grey wolf Canis lupus Summary
- Page 100 and 101: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 102 and 103: Drivers of recovery Figure 2. Distr
- Page 104 and 105: References 1. Mech, L.D. & Boitani,
- Page 106 and 107: 3.12. Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx Summa
- Page 108 and 109: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 110 and 111: % change 750 600 450 300 150 0 Figu
- Page 112 and 113: Figure 3. Map of recent development
- Page 114 and 115: 3.13. Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus Su
- Page 116 and 117: Figure 1a. Distribution of the Iber
- Page 118 and 119: Table 3. Major reasons for positive
- Page 120 and 121: 18. IUCN 2011b. European Red List.
- Page 122 and 123: 3.14. Wolverine Gulo gulo Summary T
- Page 124 and 125: Figure 1a. Distribution of Wolverin
- Page 126 and 127: Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 128 and 129: 3.15. Grey seal Halichoerus grypus
- Page 130 and 131: Estimate assessed Reference Global
- Page 132 and 133: % change 1500 1200 900 600 300 0 Fi
- Page 134 and 135: 3.16. Harbour seal Phoca vitulina S
- Page 136 and 137: east coast, the distribution is res
- Page 138 and 139: % change 200 150 100 50 0 populatio
- Page 142 and 143: 3.17. Brown bear Ursus arctos Summa
- Page 144 and 145: Table 2. Latest population estimate
- Page 146 and 147: 144
- Page 148 and 149: Recent developments % change 200 15
- Page 150 and 151: mation, e.g. between Slovenia and C
- Page 152 and 153: 3.18. Eurasian beaver Castor fiber
- Page 154 and 155: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 156 and 157: % change 20,000 16,000 12,000 200 1
- Page 158 and 159: Table 3. Major reasons for change i
- Page 160 and 161: 158
- Page 162 and 163: 4.1. Pink-footed goose Anser brachy
- Page 164 and 165: Table 2. Major threats that drove P
- Page 166 and 167: 4.2. Barnacle goose Branta leucopsi
- Page 168 and 169: Figure 2. Current breeding and wint
- Page 170 and 171: Table 3. Conservation actions in pl
- Page 172 and 173: 4.3. Whooper swan Cygnus cygnus Sum
- Page 174 and 175: Threat Description Impact Hunting a
- Page 176 and 177: 4.4. White-headed duck Oxyura leuco
- Page 178 and 179: No. of individuals 5000 4500 4000 3
- Page 180 and 181: educing the population in the count
- Page 182 and 183: 4.5. White stork Ciconia ciconia Su
- Page 184 and 185: Country No. of breeding pairs Trend
- Page 186 and 187: Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 188 and 189: 4.6. Eurasian spoonbill Platalea le
- Page 190 and 191:
Country No. of breeding pairs No. o
- Page 192 and 193:
Threat Description Impact Residenti
- Page 194 and 195:
4.7. Dalmatian pelican Pelecanus cr
- Page 196 and 197:
194
- Page 198 and 199:
Table 3 Major threats that drove th
- Page 200 and 201:
4.8. Lesser kestrel Falco naumanni
- Page 202 and 203:
Figure 2. Current distribution of L
- Page 204 and 205:
Action Description Impact Livelihoo
- Page 206 and 207:
4.9. Saker falcon Falco cherrug Sum
- Page 208 and 209:
Table 2. Latest Saker falcon popula
- Page 210 and 211:
Action Description Impact Planning
- Page 212 and 213:
4.10. Peregrine falcon Falco peregr
- Page 214 and 215:
No. of breeding pairs 1,600 1,200 8
- Page 216 and 217:
Action Description Impact Legislati
- Page 218 and 219:
4.11. Red kite Milvus milvus Summar
- Page 220 and 221:
Country No. of breeding pairs Trend
- Page 222 and 223:
Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 224 and 225:
4.12. White-tailed eagle Haliaeetus
- Page 226 and 227:
Country No. of breeding pairs Year
- Page 228 and 229:
References 1. Bijleveld, M. 1974 Bi
- Page 230 and 231:
4.13. Bearded vulture Gypaetus barb
- Page 232 and 233:
Figure 2. Current distribution of B
- Page 234 and 235:
4.14. Griffon vulture Gyps fulvus S
- Page 236 and 237:
Figure 2. Current distribution of G
- Page 238 and 239:
Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 240 and 241:
4.15. Cinereous vulture Aegypius mo
- Page 242 and 243:
Figure 2. Current distribution of C
- Page 244 and 245:
4.16. Spanish imperial eagle Aquila
- Page 246 and 247:
Threat Description Impact Transport
- Page 248 and 249:
Drivers of recovery The spectacular
- Page 250 and 251:
4.17. Eastern imperial eagle Aquila
- Page 252 and 253:
Figure 2. Current distribution of E
- Page 254 and 255:
252
- Page 256 and 257:
4.18. Common crane Grus grus Summar
- Page 258 and 259:
Figure 2. Current breeding and wint
- Page 260 and 261:
Action Monitoring and planning Site
- Page 262 and 263:
4.19. Roseate tern Sterna dougallii
- Page 264 and 265:
Threat Description Impact Human int
- Page 266 and 267:
264
- Page 268 and 269:
337,539 2,000 20,000 >163,750 % abu
- Page 270 and 271:
1950s 1980s Present 50km grid Speci
- Page 272 and 273:
No. of species 1 2 3 4 5 6 > 6 No.
- Page 274 and 275:
272
- Page 276 and 277:
A Range change B Range change C Ran
- Page 278 and 279:
Reason for positive change Species
- Page 280 and 281:
Dalmatian pelicans at the Kerkini L
- Page 282 and 283:
280
- Page 284 and 285:
The comeback of large and charismat
- Page 286 and 287:
A safari group in the Velebit mount
- Page 288 and 289:
The view from a bear watching hide
- Page 290 and 291:
species [44] [45] and if animals be
- Page 292 and 293:
One of the challenges around increa
- Page 294 and 295:
Box 1. Return and urbanization of w
- Page 296 and 297:
Table 1. Livestock damage by mammal
- Page 298 and 299:
key tool for wildlife population in
- Page 300 and 301:
Some of the over 500,000 visitors a
- Page 302 and 303:
Box 2. The native versus alien spec
- Page 304 and 305:
References 1. Navarro, L.M. and H.M
- Page 306 and 307:
113. Potena, G., et al., Brown Bear
- Page 308 and 309:
Appendix 1. Sources of distribution
- Page 310:
Acknowledgements This study on wild